|
Center
for Individual Freedom to Join Lawsuit
Challenging Constitutionality of "Campaign Finance Reform"
Law
On
March 27, 2002, President George W. Bush privately, without
ceremony or even a publicly released photograph signed into
law the bill commonly referred to as "campaign finance reform"
the most extensive and insidious assault on political speech ever
ventured in the U.S.
Lawsuits
were filed immediately, most prominently by U.S. Senator Mitch McConnell
(R-KY), who has for years spearheaded the vigorous and articulate
opposition to this misguided legislation in Congress. Senator McConnells
initial complaint charges that the law contains extensive violations
of the Constitution, restricting "the ways that citizens, corporations,
labor unions, trade associations, officeholders, candidates, advocacy
groups, tax-exempt organizations, and national, state, and local
political party committees are permitted to participate in our Nations
democratic process." To read the complaint in its entirety,
click
here.
A
distinguished legal team of constitutional and federal election
law attorneys, led by Kenneth W. Starr, has been assembled by Senator
McConnell, who anticipates the addition of a wide variety of co-plaintiffs.
The Center for Individual Freedom will be one of those, and will
be represented by the Southeastern Legal Foundation.
"We
have long anticipated this lawsuit," said Eric Schippers, Executive
Director of the Center. "It will be a watershed event in constitutional
law, and at the very least will define those restrictions on political
speech that are permissible and those, if any, that are not. We
are honored and grateful to be represented by the Southeastern Legal
Foundation, with which we share many values, including the supremacy
of the Constitution.
"The
Center for Individual Freedom enters this lawsuit for three reasons:
First, as a non-profit, non-partisan corporation actively engaged
in public issues discussions, the Centers own voice would
be severely restricted and, in some circumstances, silenced by this
law. Second, because of the unconstitutional restraints on the political
speech of all those enumerated by Senator McConnell, regardless
of political orientation, ideology or position. Defending the Constitution
against such infringements is what we do every day. Third, this
law has been portrayed as something it is not and is poorly understood
for what it is. We believe the courts will reinstate the constitutional
principles, including clarity, which the politicians and the media
supporting this law have abandoned."
While
the McConnell lawsuit will serve as the vehicle for numerous co-plaintiffs
in an effort of considerable scope and focus, the National Rifle
Association has filed a separate lawsuit, and others are anticipated.
Under guidelines for legal challenges set by the law itself, all
lawsuits will likely be consolidated and will be tried before a
three-judge panel, with expedited review by the U.S. Supreme Court.
[Posted
April 4, 2002]
|