The
Daschle Energy Plan:
400 Pages and Still No Energy Independence
If the events
of September 11 have taught us anything, its that a strong
national energy policy reducing Americas dependence on foreign
oil is essential to long term national security.
Last May, President
George W. Bush unveiled his national energy plan, an integral part
of which was opening a tiny sliver of Alaskas Arctic National
Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) to oil and gas exploration. The House of
Representatives moved relatively quickly to approve H.R. 4, Securing
Americas Future Energy Act of 2001 (SAFE), which contains
most of the measures sought by the President including the
ANWR provision. However, the Senate is a different zoo and Majority
Leader Tom Daschle (D-SD) has mired the energy debate in partisan
politics.
Daschle and
Massachusetts Senator John Kerry (D), both 2004 Presidential aspirants
courting the environmental lobby, have successfully prevented a
Senate vote on the House-passed bill. Kerry has mounted countless
filibuster threats against any energy bill that calls for exploration
in ANWR, and the majority leader has repeatedly refused to schedule
a vote on ANWR even though it represents this countrys
largest untapped onshore energy reserve. Despite the desperate need
for more domestic energy production to begin, Daschle and Kerrys
political gamesmanship has eliminated any chances for Senate passage
of a comprehensive energy plan this year.
Instead, Majority
Leader Daschle recently announced the introduction of an alternative
bill, the Energy Policy Act of 2002 (S. 1766), that will serve as
the base for debate in February a bill filled with hypocrisy
and ineffective programs. Of course, this alternative bill, the
second energy plan introduced by Senate Democrats in the last 10
months, does not include a provision for ANWR exploration. Nor does
it sufficiently address a path to energy independence.
The Daschle
plan puts major emphasis on renewable energy sources such as wind
and solar power, tripling the amount of energy generated from such
sources by 2020 as a way to reduce Americas energy dependence.
While Congress should not shy away from exploring greater energy
production through these renewable sources, solar and wind power
is very expensive and, alone, have proven insufficient in generating
vast amounts of energy. Solar energy is unlikely to ever provide
enough power to have even a miniscule effect. Windmills are simply
unreliable. As Senior Fellow for the CATO Institute Patrick Michaels
bluntly put it, windmills "stop working precisely when energy
demand is at its greatest (during the hottest and coldest temperatures,
which usually occur under calm conditions)."
Senators Daschle
and Kerry, armed with talking points from their environmental extremist
friends, have criticized the Presidents energy plan as one
that provides "favors" to "big oil" in the form
of tax breaks. Yet the hypocrisy of Daschles plan is that
it may provide equal, if not more, so-called "favors"
in the form of loan guarantees and gigantic subsidies. The difference
is the tax breaks outlined in the Presidents plan provide
incentives that will lead to better technologies in terms of production
and delivery infrastructure, leading to cost effective energy. The
loan guarantees and subsidies outlined in Daschles plan will
cost significantly more and call for government mandates, leading
to higher energy costs.
Daschles
bill does provide for increased energy exploration in the portion
of Alaskas North Slope, already open to oil and gas drilling.
Yet, according to many experts, those wells are drying up. That
is all the more reason why the majority leaders refusal to
permit a vote on responsible exploration in the tiny arctic sliver
of ANWR, specifically on roughly 2000 acres of Area 1002, makes
no sense beyond the political.
ANWR is the
birthing ground for the 129,000-strong Porcupine Caribou herd, and
environmentalists claim exploration will disrupt the herd to a point
of extinction. However, one doesnt need to look very far to
the heavily-drilled Prudhoe Bay-area, home of the Central Arctic
caribou herd. The Central Arctic herd has increased five fold since
drilling began in Prudhoe Bay in the early 1970s. Thirty years of
scientific observation should be enough to understand that responsible
exploration and wildlife preservation can and will coexist.
It is no secret
that Daschles environmental friends generate large contributions
on the ANWR issue. It is likewise no secret that Daschle needs their
support as he gears up for the Presidential race in 2004. Regardless,
the claims of environmental destruction -- should there be drilling
in Area 1002-- are unfounded.
To achieve more
energy independence, America has to produce more domestic energy,
exploring all promising sources. Area 1002 in ANWR, which was put
aside by Congress specifically for oil and gas exploration and development,
provides the most promise for reducing our dependence on foreign
oil sources. The nearly 400-page Daschle plan does not.
[Posted
on December 14, 2001]
Return
to Energy
Index
|