In case you missed the news, the United States Postal Service -- still clinging to the hope that e-mail…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
The Postman Always Begs Twice

In case you missed the news, the United States Postal Service -- still clinging to the hope that e-mail thing is a fad -- released yet another series of dismal financial numbers today. From the Hill:

The U.S. Postal Service announced Thursday that it lost $3.3 billion in the first three months of the fiscal year as the agency continues to hemorrhage money.

The majority of the losses, some $3.1 billion, occurred because the USPS had to pre-fund its retirement plan.

... The USPS might run up against its debt ceiling this fall, forcing action on the bills.

... [Congressman Darrell] Issa noted that USPS has said that even if it no longer needs to pre-fund its employee benefits, it will still reach its debt limit in the fall.

Keep in mind that the USPS lost $8.5 billion in 2010 and an…[more]

February 09, 2012 • 03:13 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Jester's Courtroom Swear It Isn’t So
Swear It Isn’t So Print
Thursday, January 08 2009

Hamilton County (Ohio) Judge Robert Ruehlman is fed up with swearing in his courtroom and he is doing something about it. 

On consecutive days, Judge Ruehlman sentenced two individuals to six months in jail for swearing in his courtroom.  Not the swearing in of a party or witness, but rather cuss words from an individual.

First, it was an accused gang member.  Unhappy with having to wait in jail for several more weeks until his trial, accused gang member Jamel Sechrest muttered “That’s (bleeping) bull (bleep).”  “You don’t say bull (bleep) in the courtroom,” Ruehlman told Sechrest before citing him for contempt and sentencing him to six months in jail.

The following day, attorney Michael Brautigam was before the court as his own attorney when he called his opposing counsel “a (bleeping) liar.”  After admitting to the judge what he said under his breath, Brautigam was cited for contempt and sent to jail for six months.  “I had to give him six months because I gave the other guy six months,” Ruehlman said.

“Judge Ruehlman absolutely did the right thing by attempting to maintain order, civility and decorum in his courtroom.  Attorney Brautigam has been discourteous and disrespectful to judges, lawyers and litigants in our community on more than one occasion,” said opposing counsel Peter Koenig.

—Source:  Cincinnati Enquirer

Question of the Week   
Where does the United States rank in The Heritage Foundation’s 2012 Index of Economic Freedom?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"The political furor over President Obama's birth-control mandate continues to grow, even among those for whom contraception poses no moral qualms, and one needn't be a theologian to understand why. The country is being exposed to the raw political control that is the core of the Obama health-care plan, and Americans are seeing clearly for the first time how this will violate pluralism and liberty…[more]
 
 
—The Editors, The Wall Street Journal
— The Editors, The Wall Street Journal
 
Liberty Poll   

Should the Obama administration support Israel in a military strike against Iranian nuclear facilities?