This week’s edition of the Liberty Update, CFIF’s weekly e-newsletter, is out. Below is a summary…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
This Week's Liberty Update

This week’s edition of the Liberty Update, CFIF’s weekly e-newsletter, is out. Below is a summary of its contents:

Hillyer:  Reagan 101

Ellis:  Direct-Pay Medicine: A Free Market Approach to Healthcare Reform

Lee:  Obama, Three Years Ago This Week: "If I Don't Have This Turned Around in Three Years..." Senik:  The "Republican Establishment" Rides Again

Release:  Conservative Leaders Call On President, Congress To Pass Corporate Tax Reform

Podcast:  The Consequences of Pres. Obama's Refusal to Approve Keystone XL Pipeline

Jester’s Courtroom:  Lawyers Win Big in iLawsuit

Editorial Cartoons:  Latest Cartoons of Michael Ramirez

Quiz:  Question of the Week

Notable Quotes:  Quotes of the Week

If you are not already signed up to receive CFIF’s Liberty[more]

February 03, 2012 • 10:30 am

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Jester's Courtroom Nothing Casual About This Lawsuit
Nothing Casual About This Lawsuit Print
Wednesday, November 04 2009

A federal judge in New York threw out a complaint by a lawyer alleging a constitutional right to wear jeans and a baseball cap in court.

Donning an "Operation Desert Storm" baseball hat, blue jeans, and a button-down shirt, attorney Todd Bank appeared before housing court Judge Ann Katz who told him he was dressed inappropriately.  Then the court clerk asked him to remove his hat.  Bank sued the judge and clerk, claiming his right to free speech and his liberty to dress as he wishes were violated.

U.S. District Judge Nicholas Garaufis disagreed, writing that a courtroom is a "staid environment" where a judge can set reasonable limits to enforce "commonly shared mores of courtroom civility."

Ruling that the case raised "no serious dispute," Judge Garaufis lamented that the Attorney General's office had to expend resources defending the matter.

—Source:  Reuters.com

Question of the Week   
How many times in our nation’s history have two former Speakers of the House of Representatives faced off against each other for election as President of the United States?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"The [Indiana right-to-work law] is yet another indication that the American people understand that while unions serve a purpose, their political agenda is more about power and leverage than the rights of workers. The concept of the 'union shop' in which the government allows workers to be bullied and taxed into submission is repugnant. It also is the underlying factor behind the trend by which powerful…[more]
 
 
—Jonathan S. Tobin, Commentary Magazine
— Jonathan S. Tobin, Commentary Magazine
 
Liberty Poll   

What team are you supporting in the Super Bowl?