As a companion must-read article to Tim’s column on the ObamaCare birth control mandate, John Cochrane…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Cato on Contraception Mandate: 'We Should All be Exempt'

As a companion must-read article to Tim’s column on the ObamaCare birth control mandate, John Cochrane of Cato explains why President Barack Obama’s proposed compromise to exempt church-related institutions misses the point:

Our nation is divided on social issues. The natural compromise is simple: Birth control, abortion and other contentious practices are permitted. But those who object don't have to pay for them. The federal takeover of medicine prevents us from reaching these natural compromises and needlessly divides our society.

The critics fell for a trap. By focusing on an exemption for church-related institutions, critics effectively admit that it is right for the rest of us to be subjected to this sort of mandate. They accept the horribly misnamed Patient Protection and Affordable…[more]

February 10, 2012 • 04:52 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Jester's Courtroom Now Hear This: Listen at Own Risk
Now Hear This: Listen at Own Risk Print
Wednesday, January 27 2010

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently upheld dismissal of a lawsuit against Apple Computer, Inc., the maker of the iPod music player.  The class-action lawsuit, originally filed in January 2006, claimed that the 115-decibels sound production capability of the iPod was potentially damaging for the users’ hearing, that the device and headsets sold were defective and that the company failed to adequately warn the users of possible hearing loss.

“Studies indicate that exposure to 115 dB for more than 28 seconds per day, over time, can cause permanent damage,” the lawsuit contended.

In upholding the lower-court ruling, Senior Judge David Thompson wrote, “At most, the plaintiffs plead a potential risk of hearing loss not to themselves, but to other unidentified iPod users.”  The lower court ruled that any risk of hearing loss from playing music too loud were “obvious” and that the plaintiffs failed to provide evidence that iPods were defective. 

—Source:  Macworld.com

Question of the Week   
Where does the United States rank in The Heritage Foundation’s 2012 Index of Economic Freedom?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Someone needs to ask Mr. Obama how an increasingly impoverished nation, limping along on food stamps and housing subsidies, is going to pay for the existing beneficiaries, along with 77 million Baby Boomers set to retire in the next 25 years. A president who has impaired the vibrancy of the private sector so badly has long since forfeited the moral high ground."…[more]
 
 
—Mona Charen, Nationally Syndicated Columnist
— Mona Charen, Nationally Syndicated Columnist
 
Liberty Poll   

Should the Obama administration support Israel in a military strike against Iranian nuclear facilities?