As a companion must-read article to Tim’s column on the ObamaCare birth control mandate, John Cochrane…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Cato on Contraception Mandate: 'We Should All be Exempt'

As a companion must-read article to Tim’s column on the ObamaCare birth control mandate, John Cochrane of Cato explains why President Barack Obama’s proposed compromise to exempt church-related institutions misses the point:

Our nation is divided on social issues. The natural compromise is simple: Birth control, abortion and other contentious practices are permitted. But those who object don't have to pay for them. The federal takeover of medicine prevents us from reaching these natural compromises and needlessly divides our society.

The critics fell for a trap. By focusing on an exemption for church-related institutions, critics effectively admit that it is right for the rest of us to be subjected to this sort of mandate. They accept the horribly misnamed Patient Protection and Affordable…[more]

February 10, 2012 • 04:52 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room Americans Say “No” to Google’s Energy Plan
Americans Say “No” to Google’s Energy Plan Print
Friday, October 17 2008

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

October 17, 2008


More than 25,000 letters sent to Congress reject Internet giant’s $4 trillion boondoggle


ALEXANDRIA, VA – The Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) today announced that its activists and supporters have flooded Members of Congress with more than 25,000 letters during the past week expressing outrage over an expensive, dubiously beneficial energy plan being peddled by Internet titan Google.


As outlined in its proposal, the company is calling on the federal government to spend $4.4 trillion in U.S. taxpayer money on alternative fuels in an effort to completely eliminate our nation’s use of fossil fuels. However, the only thing that’s “green” about Google’s plan is its ignorance on energy issues.


Google proposes establishing wind and solar as primary power sources. But those fuel sources – while they show future promise – now account for only a tiny fraction of America’s total power generation. Even assuming a 20 percent growth rate for the next 22 years (a feat even their staunchest supporters believe to be impossible), wind and solar would still meet less than five percent of the world’s energy demand.


“Google’s proposal is arrogant, naïve and dangerous, not to mention ironically anti-energy,” explains Timothy Lee, CFIF’s Director of Legal and Public Affairs. “The Internet company shows its self-fulfilling naiveté by suggesting a total elimination of fossil fuels—a notion even the most radical energy experts reject. This, at a time when the American people are struggling to pay prices at the pump.”


“True experts who - unlike Google - have experience and credibility in the energy field believe that only an ‘all of the above’ approach incorporating both traditional and alternative fuels will best meet America’s energy challenges,” Lee said. “Google barging in and attempting to act as dominant advisor on U.S. energy policy is just as absurd as Coca-Cola dictating our country’s Internet policy.


“If Google wants to spend its own money on a naïve energy proposal, it should have at it,” said Lee. “But taxpayers should not be stuck with a $4.4 trillion bill, much of which would go directly to pad Google’s bottom line.”


Founded in 1998, the Center for Individual Freedom (www.cfif.org) is a constitutional and free-market advocacy organization with more than 250,000 supporters and activists nationwide.

Question of the Week   
Where does the United States rank in The Heritage Foundation’s 2012 Index of Economic Freedom?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Someone needs to ask Mr. Obama how an increasingly impoverished nation, limping along on food stamps and housing subsidies, is going to pay for the existing beneficiaries, along with 77 million Baby Boomers set to retire in the next 25 years. A president who has impaired the vibrancy of the private sector so badly has long since forfeited the moral high ground."…[more]
 
 
—Mona Charen, Nationally Syndicated Columnist
— Mona Charen, Nationally Syndicated Columnist
 
Liberty Poll   

Should the Obama administration support Israel in a military strike against Iranian nuclear facilities?