As a companion must-read article to Tim’s column on the ObamaCare birth control mandate, John Cochrane…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Cato on Contraception Mandate: 'We Should All be Exempt'

As a companion must-read article to Tim’s column on the ObamaCare birth control mandate, John Cochrane of Cato explains why President Barack Obama’s proposed compromise to exempt church-related institutions misses the point:

Our nation is divided on social issues. The natural compromise is simple: Birth control, abortion and other contentious practices are permitted. But those who object don't have to pay for them. The federal takeover of medicine prevents us from reaching these natural compromises and needlessly divides our society.

The critics fell for a trap. By focusing on an exemption for church-related institutions, critics effectively admit that it is right for the rest of us to be subjected to this sort of mandate. They accept the horribly misnamed Patient Protection and Affordable…[more]

February 10, 2012 • 04:52 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room RELEASE: CFIF Calls on EPA to Reconsider Costly and Arbitrary Global Warming Regulation
RELEASE: CFIF Calls on EPA to Reconsider Costly and Arbitrary Global Warming Regulation Print
Friday, December 18 2009

ALEXANDRIA, VA – Today, the Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) called upon Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lisa Jackson to reconsider the EPA’s costly and defective endangerment finding for alleged greenhouse gas emissions.  The EPA recently exceeded its proper authority by unilaterally declaring everyday carbon dioxide a “dangerous pollutant.”  This unwarranted and illogical determination threatens to cripple the American economy by suddenly burdening businesses and consumers with new carbon regulations and penalties. 

The EPA is now attempting to create a fig leaf by arbitrarily stating that only businesses emitting over 25,000 tons per year would be subject to its regulation.  Unfortunately, the Clean Air Act on which the EPA regulation is based explicitly regulates even low-level sources of covered emissions, and provides no statutory authority for the EPA to set its lower threshold.  As a consequence, extremist environmental groups are sure to sue the EPA to overturn its 25,000-ton limit, which would suddenly subject even minimal emitters to draconian carbon regulations. 

“At a time of high unemployment and economic uncertainty throughout America, the last thing the EPA and federal regulators should be doing is imposing crippling new global warming regulations upon businesses,” said Timothy Lee, CFIF’s Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs.  “This may be popular in Europe and among America’s competitors and enemies, but it’s bad news for Americans. Not only is the EPA’s ruling likely to be overturned by litigious environmental activists, but it will subject millions of businesses, schools, apartment buildings and even farms to its draconian regulation,” Mr. Lee added. 

“We therefore call upon the EPA to reconsider its attempt to single-handedly regulate the American economy, if not abandon it altogether,” said Lee.  “This is not the time for even more burdensome and unnecessary burdens upon employers and businesses,” Lee concluded. 

To read CFIF's comment as it was submitted to the EPA, click here (.pdf)

###

Question of the Week   
Where does the United States rank in The Heritage Foundation’s 2012 Index of Economic Freedom?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Someone needs to ask Mr. Obama how an increasingly impoverished nation, limping along on food stamps and housing subsidies, is going to pay for the existing beneficiaries, along with 77 million Baby Boomers set to retire in the next 25 years. A president who has impaired the vibrancy of the private sector so badly has long since forfeited the moral high ground."…[more]
 
 
—Mona Charen, Nationally Syndicated Columnist
— Mona Charen, Nationally Syndicated Columnist
 
Liberty Poll   

Should the Obama administration support Israel in a military strike against Iranian nuclear facilities?