Last week, I wrote in my column that “So far, consensus around the FAA’s thinking indicates that…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Some Domestic Drones May Get Rubber Bullets, Tear Gas

Last week, I wrote in my column that “So far, consensus around the FAA’s thinking indicates that domestic drones would not be approved to fly with weapons.”

That was in reference to the Federal Aviation Administration’s announcement that it will ease restrictions on civilian use of unmanned drones for use in surveillance and research.  The institutions most interested in using drones are law enforcement entities ranging from the FBI to local police departments.

Now, consider this:

Chief Deputy Randy McDaniel of the Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office in Texas told The Daily that his department is considering using rubber bullets and tear gas on its drone.

“Those are things that law enforcement utilizes day in and day out and in certain situations it might be advantageous…[more]

May 23, 2012 • 03:32 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room CFIF Statement on the FCC’s Latest “Net Neutrality” Incarnation
CFIF Statement on the FCC’s Latest “Net Neutrality” Incarnation Print
Wednesday, December 01 2010

ALEXANDRIA, VA -- Today, Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) Chairman Julius Genachowski announced his intention to impose “Net Neutrality” regulation on the Internet by year’s end.  The new plan, which has not been released publicly and which presumably will be deliberated on and revised behind closed doors over the next three weeks, will be voted on at the FCC’s December 21 meeting. 

In response, Center for Individual Freedom (“CFIF”) President Jeffrey Mazzella made the following statement:

“By a two-to-one margin, the American public opposes regulation of the Internet via ‘Net Neutrality,’ and a bipartisan majority in Congress has expressed opposition to it in no uncertain terms.  A unanimous panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has ruled that the FCC lacks authority to regulate the Internet. Yet, bucking the federal courts, Congress and public opinion, the FCC persists. 

“While we appreciate the fact that Chairman Genachowski has seemingly stepped back from the ‘Title II reclassification’ cliff, we maintain that opening up the regulatory Pandora’s Box that is ‘Net Neutrality’ at all is both unwarranted and unnecessary.  For a government agency to unilaterally grant itself the power to do so is flat out dangerous.”

###

Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
How many steps in each direction are marched by the sentinels while guarding The Tomb of the Unknowns at Arlington National Cemetery?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Trying to figure out Valerie Jarrett’s mysterious hold on Barack and Michelle Obama is a favorite guessing game in the parlors and dining rooms of Washington. No other White House official in history has enjoyed such a unique relationship with both a president and a first lady, and yet the mainstream media have ignored Jarrett’s enormous influence over the shape and direction of the Obama…[more]
 
 
—Edward Klein, Author, Vanity Fair Contributing Editor, Former Newsweek Foreign Editor and Former New York Times Magazine Editor in Chief
— Edward Klein, Author, Vanity Fair Contributing Editor, Former Newsweek Foreign Editor and Former New York Times Magazine Editor in Chief
 
Liberty Poll   

Should the Obama administration authorize the use of aerial drones by local police agencies?