Last week, I wrote in my column that “So far, consensus around the FAA’s thinking indicates that…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Some Domestic Drones May Get Rubber Bullets, Tear Gas

Last week, I wrote in my column that “So far, consensus around the FAA’s thinking indicates that domestic drones would not be approved to fly with weapons.”

That was in reference to the Federal Aviation Administration’s announcement that it will ease restrictions on civilian use of unmanned drones for use in surveillance and research.  The institutions most interested in using drones are law enforcement entities ranging from the FBI to local police departments.

Now, consider this:

Chief Deputy Randy McDaniel of the Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office in Texas told The Daily that his department is considering using rubber bullets and tear gas on its drone.

“Those are things that law enforcement utilizes day in and day out and in certain situations it might be advantageous…[more]

May 23, 2012 • 03:32 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room Leading National Organizations Urge Speaker Boehner to Preserve Amendment Defunding DOE’s “Gainful Employment” Regulation
Leading National Organizations Urge Speaker Boehner to Preserve Amendment Defunding DOE’s “Gainful Employment” Regulation Print
Monday, March 21 2011

Last month, a bipartisan majority in the House of Representatives passed an amendment to H.R. 1 that stated that no funds may be used to “implement, administer or enforce” the U.S. Department of Education’s proposed Gainful Employment rule, nor may the Department “promulgate or enforce any new regulation or rule” that would have the same effect as the Gainful Employment rule.

In a letter organized by the Center for Individual Freedom (“CFIF”) and sent to Rep. John Boehner last week, nine leading national organizations representing millions of taxpayers respectfully urged the Speaker to instruct House conferees – after the Senate has taken action on H.R. 1 and a conference is scheduled – to not allow that amendment to be used as “trade bait” for something Senate conferees seek to add to or eliminate from H.R. 1.

“From allegations of insider trading to defective Government Accountability Office reports, everything surrounding the Education Department’s handling of this issue has been appalling,” the groups noted in the letter. “This entire Obama Administration assault represents the worst in bureaucratic regulatory overreach, and the proposed rule would eliminate competition in the higher education arena where it is critically needed.”

In addition to CFIF, other organizations on the letter included: Americans for Tax Reform, Business Coalition for Fair Competition, Citizens Against Government Waste, Competitive Enterprise Institute, Hispanic Leadership Fund, Institute for Liberty, Log Cabin Republicans and Small Business and Entrepreneurship Council.

To read the letter as it was sent it Speaker John Boehner, click here (PDF).

Question of the Week   
How many steps in each direction are marched by the sentinels while guarding The Tomb of the Unknowns at Arlington National Cemetery?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Trying to figure out Valerie Jarrett’s mysterious hold on Barack and Michelle Obama is a favorite guessing game in the parlors and dining rooms of Washington. No other White House official in history has enjoyed such a unique relationship with both a president and a first lady, and yet the mainstream media have ignored Jarrett’s enormous influence over the shape and direction of the Obama…[more]
 
 
—Edward Klein, Author, Vanity Fair Contributing Editor, Former Newsweek Foreign Editor and Former New York Times Magazine Editor in Chief
— Edward Klein, Author, Vanity Fair Contributing Editor, Former Newsweek Foreign Editor and Former New York Times Magazine Editor in Chief
 
Liberty Poll   

Should the Obama administration authorize the use of aerial drones by local police agencies?