Last week, I wrote in my column that “So far, consensus around the FAA’s thinking indicates that…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Some Domestic Drones May Get Rubber Bullets, Tear Gas

Last week, I wrote in my column that “So far, consensus around the FAA’s thinking indicates that domestic drones would not be approved to fly with weapons.”

That was in reference to the Federal Aviation Administration’s announcement that it will ease restrictions on civilian use of unmanned drones for use in surveillance and research.  The institutions most interested in using drones are law enforcement entities ranging from the FBI to local police departments.

Now, consider this:

Chief Deputy Randy McDaniel of the Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office in Texas told The Daily that his department is considering using rubber bullets and tear gas on its drone.

“Those are things that law enforcement utilizes day in and day out and in certain situations it might be advantageous…[more]

May 23, 2012 • 03:32 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room CFIF Urges Texas Legislature to Reject New Taxes on “Thin Air”
CFIF Urges Texas Legislature to Reject New Taxes on “Thin Air” Print
Tuesday, April 05 2011

In a letter sent today to every member of the State Affairs Committee of the Texas House of Representatives, Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs Timothy Lee urged opposition to legislation (HB 259 and HB 3675) that would impose new and unwarranted taxes on satellite television providers. 

In addition to noting that Texas consumers already pay among the highest tax rates in the nation for telecommunication services, Lee questioned the justification for the proposed new taxes.  “HB 259 and HB 3675 would impose taxes on something satellite television providers don’t even use – the physical public right of way,” Lee wrote.  In other words, the Texas legislature is contemplating literally a tax on “thin air.”

Read the entire letter below.


April 5, 2011

Representative Byron Cook                                     Representative Jose Menendez
Chairman, House State Affairs Committee          Vice Chairman, House State Affairs Committee
Room E2.214, Capitol Extension                           Room EXT E1.420, Capitol Extension
P.O. Box 2910                                                             P.O. Box 2910
Austin, TX 78768                                                        Austin, TX 78768

VIA FACSIMILE

Dear Chairman Cook and Vice Chairman Menendez: 

On behalf of the Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) and over 17,000 activists and supporters across the state of Texas, I write to urge your opposition to HB 259 and HB 3675, which would impose new and unwarranted taxes on satellite television providers.  Raising taxes of any kind during this period of elevated unemployment and economic difficulty is a destructive idea generally.  The new taxes contemplated by HB 259 and HB 3675, however, are particularly unjustified. 

First, Texans already pay among the highest tax rates in the nation for telecommunications services.  Last year, Texas consumers paid over $429 million in franchise taxes in its ten largest cities alone, and $1.2 billion over the past three years.  That is certainly not conducive to growth for such a critical sector of our future economy.  

Second, HB 259 and HB 3675 would impose taxes on something satellite television providers don’t even use – the physical public right of way.  It is certainly understandable that entities actually using the public right of way under city streets or along physical power lines should help maintain those rights of way.  But satellite video providers don’t even use the physical right of way – thus making HB 259 and HB 3675 a tax on “thin air.”  Texas already imposes taxes on video services, so imposing an entirely new tax on physical rights of way that satellite providers don’t even use is manifestly unfair. 

Moreover, it is estimated that only 10% of right of way taxes actually go to maintenance of right of way, with 90% of collected revenues going to general city funds.  Attempting to impose right of way taxes on satellite providers is therefore a transparent money grab.  Accordingly, we at CFIF respectfully request that you oppose the unfair taxes proposed by HB 259 and HB 3675 during this period of protracted economic difficulty, high unemployment and state business competition.  Thank you very much for your attention to this important matter.   

Sincerely,  

/s/
 
Timothy Lee 
Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs 


cc:  All members of the State Affairs Committee, Texas House of Representatives
 

Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
How many steps in each direction are marched by the sentinels while guarding The Tomb of the Unknowns at Arlington National Cemetery?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Trying to figure out Valerie Jarrett’s mysterious hold on Barack and Michelle Obama is a favorite guessing game in the parlors and dining rooms of Washington. No other White House official in history has enjoyed such a unique relationship with both a president and a first lady, and yet the mainstream media have ignored Jarrett’s enormous influence over the shape and direction of the Obama…[more]
 
 
—Edward Klein, Author, Vanity Fair Contributing Editor, Former Newsweek Foreign Editor and Former New York Times Magazine Editor in Chief
— Edward Klein, Author, Vanity Fair Contributing Editor, Former Newsweek Foreign Editor and Former New York Times Magazine Editor in Chief
 
Liberty Poll   

Should the Obama administration authorize the use of aerial drones by local police agencies?