Even Democratic senators on the Judiciary
Committee who ultimately did not support Judge Pickerings
nomination... went out of their way to state that he is not a racist.
|
Setting
the Record Straight on Judge Pickering
By Senator
Orrin G. Hatch
In 1962, the
Governor of Mississippi violated an order of the United States Supreme
Court and personally barred James Meredith, a black student, from
enrolling at the University of Mississippi. It took hundreds
of United States Marshals and National Guard soldiers, acting under
the direction of President Kennedy, to ensure his enrollment.
Wide-scale rioting ensued. Dozens of U.S. Marshals were shot;
hundreds of people were injured; two men were killed. This
is the Mississippi that still existed when Judge Charles Pickering
sent his young children to newly integrated public schools in Jones
County, Mississippi, in the 1960s.
Throughout the
1960s, no less than in prior decades, the Ku Klux Klan gripped the
South in a powerful stranglehold of ignorant hatred and violent
opposition to racial tolerance. In her powerful book, Coming
of Age in Mississippi, Anne Moody recounts growing up black and
describes the horror of finding her name on a Klan "wanted"
list and seeing a black child beaten as FBI agents languidly
watched from a short distance. This is the Mississippi
that existed when Judge Charles Pickering, then a young county attorney
in Jones County, helped to prosecute the Ku Klux Klan, ultimately
testifying in open court against its leader, the Imperial Wizard.
He did so despite widespread and deadly and demonstrably
credible risk of violence to him, his wife and his four young
children. For his bravery and commitment to racial equality
in the segregated Mississippi of the 1960s, County Attorney
Charles Pickering was not re-elected to that office.
A wartime
hero typically gains the privilege of never again having his valor
or courage questioned. Yet Judge Pickering is being branded
a racist in the media and by special interest groups despite his
unquestionable commitment to racial equality in the places where
it mattered the most: in the front lines, while waging battle
against an enemy that surely could do him grievous harm. Against
this documented history of action when it mattered the most, it
is astonishing to still hear the steady drumbeat of charges
that Judge Pickering is racially insensitive.
Not surprisingly,
these charges are measured out in convenient sound bites by those
liberal interest groups who practice precisely the politics
of personal destruction. Facts do not matter to them, impressions
do, and the more incendiary, the better. Judge Pickerings
opponents stake their claim to Judge Pickerings supposed racial
insensitivity principally on his actions in one case in which
he pressured prosecutors to lower a five to seven year sentence
on a defendant in a cross-burning case where the prosecutors had
given the other co-defendants including the undisputed
ringleader probation. Despite Judge Pickerings
brave commitment to civil rights in the face of personal danger,
these detractors choose to ignore another case where Judge Pickering
went beyond the ordinary to reduce the sentence of a black man convicted
on a first-time drug offense. But why let the facts
get in the way?
The racial attack
levied against Judge Pickering is simply unfair. Even Democratic
senators on the Judiciary Committee who ultimately did not support
Judge Pickerings nomination including Senators Joseph
Biden, Russell Feingold, Richard Durbin, and John Edwards
went out of their way to state that he is not a racist. And
any observer of the confirmation process knows by now that abortion,
not race, is the far-lefts real litmus test. They oppose
the nominees they believe have deeply held
personal
beliefs against abortion.
As my Democratic
colleague Senator Charles Schumer put it, "the record is quite
full" and the "issues have been aired sufficiently."
Democratic leader Senator Tom Daschle said back in February that
"in Mr. Pickerings case we know the record."
Although both are opposed to the nomination, they are right and,
after more than 860 days, its time for the Senate to vote
on this nomination.
Senator
Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT) is the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
[Posted
October 22, 2003]
Return
to Current Events Index
|