Other
Noteworthy Cases 2002
Below are archived
updates on selected cases affecting individual rights and individual
freedoms.
Clicked
Into Submission?
A
decision issued by seven judges sitting half a world away, interpreting
another country’s law, may have a greater effect on Internet publishing
in the United States than our own First Amendment. According to
a ruling from the High Court of Australia, individuals and media
that post material online available in Australia must answer for
their electronic speech in the courts “down under.”...[more]
Boo-Hoo,
Moo-Moo
Most
would agree that cows are by and large pretty happy creatures, slightly
less jovial than the common tree squirrel, but seemingly content
with their lot in life. They stand. They lie. They chew. They
swat. They get milked. They get eaten. ‘Nuff said. Au contraire,
say the activists cum circus freaks at PETA...[more]
Rulings
Breed Victory for Cheney in Dog-Fight Over Task Force Records
Proving
that a watchdog’s bark is often worse than its bite, two federal
courts have ruled that Vice President Richard Cheney does not have
to turn over private energy task force meeting documents. At least
not yet...[more]
Flying
the Unfriendly Skies:
It’s Time for Tort Reform to Take Off
Perhaps
running low on new deep-pocket defendants to sue, plaintiffs’ lawyers
are reaching to new heights and making the skies an unfriendly place
in which to do business. The latest wave of personal injury lawsuits,
titled the “economy class syndrome,” are being brought by long-haul
air travelers who claim they have developed life-threatening blood
clots after sitting immobile on long flights in economy class...[more]
Empire
State Restrictions On Out-Of-State Wine Declared Unconstitutional
A
federal judge in Manhattan on November 12 ruled that New York’s
laws prohibiting the out-of-state shipment of wine directly to consumers
in that state are unconstitutional. Nevertheless, the judge stopped
short of striking down the restrictions, instead choosing to wait
and hear arguments on December 5 about remedies to the constitutional
problem...[more]
One
Electron Too Far?: Trespassing Via the Internet
You
get to the office, pour the obligatory cup of coffee, turn on the
computer, and the work day begins. Most likely, your first order
of business is checking your messages, which in this information
age means checking your e-mail. Inevitably, the inbox opens to page
after page of new e-mail messages that have piled up overnight,
and now your sole goal is to quickly determine how many you can
delete in one swift click without ever reading past the subject
line. After all, although there might be one or two messages from
colleagues at work or friends from college, most of your inbox is
full with the Internet equivalent of direct mail advertisements
and telephone solicitations...[more]
Much
Ado About the 9th Circuit
There
has been a lot of hand-wringing in our nations capitol lately
over the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. Fueled by the
ongoing backlash to the courts controversial decision against
the Pledge of Allegiance, and the overwhelming reversal rate of
9th Circuit cases by the U.S. Supreme Court, some in Congress are
arguing the appeals court is too unwieldy and should be split up...[more]
One
Nation, Under Siege by Establishment Clause Revisionism
A nation
at war, which continues to mourn its fallen heroes from 9-11, wrapping
itself in the collective comfort of a renewed spirit of patriotism,
was rudely awakened this morning to news that the Pledge of Allegiance
is unconstitutional...[more]
Ninth
Circuit Issues Lincoln Club Ruling On Independent Expenditure Contributions
A
quarter century ago, the Supreme Court in Buckley v. Valeo held
that restrictions on contributions to candidates were subject to
lower scrutiny than restrictions on expenditures themselves because
such contributions were only "speech by proxy," enabling
someone else other than the contributor to speak...[more]
Summer
Reading Assignment:
Library Internet Pornography Filtering Case
The
recent decision in American Library Association, Inc. v. United
States is getting considerable attention because of the sexiness
of the issue it addresses access in public libraries to Internet
pornography. The interest will likely still not inspire many to
sit down and read the entire decision, which is decidedly unsexy.
It is almost 100 pages long and filled with a multitude of technical
terminology and legal citations. Dont let that turn you off.
This dissertation, rather opinion, is a must read for every First
Amendment enthusiast and cyberspace junkie...[more]
"Annie
Get Your Gun"
Second Amendment Right to Keep and Bear Arms
In
recent weeks, litigation, legislation and news-related events regarding
the right to keep and bear arms seem to be exploding nationwide.
While gun-control advocates have claimed some minor victories, it
is more the gun-rights advocates who are winning in these showdowns...[more]
Chardonnay
Crowd Takes on the Empire State
Lawyers
for a group of independent wineries recently had their day in a
New York courtroom where they uncorked their case to transport direct
wine shipment regulations out of the stone age and into the internet
age...[more]
Reading
Beyond the Headlines:
"Qualified Immunity" Case Disguised as "Hitching
Post" Case
We
are all guilty of it: merely scanning newspaper headlines and reading
the entire article only if the headline grabs our attention. The
shortsightedness of that habit, however, recently became more apparent.
On
Thursday, April 18, 2002, the New York Times ran an article headlined
"U.S. Joins Inmate in Prison Discipline Case Justices
Weigh Liability for Shackling Convict to a Post for 7 Hours."
Another Eighth Amendment prisoners rights case, right? Wrong!...[more]
Property
Rights Update:
Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Tahoe Sierra
The
United States Supreme Court heard oral argument on January 7, 2002,
in the property rights case of Tahoe Sierra Preservation Council
v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (No. 00-1167). At issue in this
case is whether a three-year building moratorium constitutes a temporary
taking, requiring just compensation under the Fifth Amendment...[more]
Township
Bent on Taking Farmers Land
On
January 14, New Jersey State Superior Court Judge James Hurley ruled
that North Brunswick Township could use eminent domain powers to
acquire 104 acres of farmland against the wishes of property owner
Edwin Otken...[more]
To
subscribe to our e-mail list for periodic updates on
important litigation and legislation affecting your individual
freedoms, click here.
The
Archives
Other
Noteworthy Cases: 2001
2002 2003
|