In this week's Liberty Update we highlight the potentially catastrophic threat of H.R. 3, the healthcare…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Quote of the Day: WSJ on H.R. 3, Biden & Pelosi's Dangerous Healthcare Bill

In this week's Liberty Update we highlight the potentially catastrophic threat of H.R. 3, the healthcare and drug price control bill that Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi are attempting to rush through Congress.  The Wall Street Journal helpfully offers further insight this morning on how H.R. 3 would threaten lifesaving U.S. pharmaceutical innovation and leadership, including on things like the Covid vaccines:

 

Companies that refuse the government’s price must pay a 95% excise tax on all revenue they generate from that drug in the U.S.  They’d also have to offer the government price to private insurers.  There’s no “negotiation” when a gun is pointed at your head.  A new study in the Journal of the American Medical Association estimates that drug spending in the U.S…[more]

September 17, 2021 • 12:55 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Democrats Trapped In Progressive Echo Chamber Print
By Byron York
Wednesday, June 16 2021
The result was a mess for Democrats competing for House and Senate seats. And much of that mess was created by a Democratic elite that didn't understand – and didn't even try to understand – what was important to the party's voters.

The reason Democrats in Washington are increasingly frustrated is because their legislative ambitions far outstrip their congressional majorities. They have no majority at all in the U.S. Senate  it is evenly divided, 50-50, between Republicans and Democrats  and depend on Vice President Kamala Harris to break ties. They have a tiny majority in the House. That makes passing bills hard and gives extraordinary power to any Democrat, like Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, who can threaten to abandon the party and sink Democratic hopes on any particular issue.

Now, a new report looks at why Democrats failed to win a bigger majority in the House and any majority in the Senate. Three activist groups  Third Way, The Collective PAC and Latino Victory  studied the party's underwhelming performance in House and Senate races in 2020. And they've come up with answers that some progressive Democrats will probably not want to hear.

First, they concluded that party leaders' hopes were just too high going into the election. Democrats had won big in the 2018 midterms, picking up 41 seats in the House. They expected another big win in 2020, and party leaders like Nancy Pelosi said so repeatedly. 

"We heard from campaign strategists that the party drove up expectations by publicly signaling it expected to win everywhere it made a play," the report said. Those sky-high expectations, based in part on poor polling that undercounted white non-college voters who were open to the Republican message, led to Democratic overconfidence.

Second, the researchers found that Democrats took minority voters for granted in a big way. Party strategists viewed black, Latino and Asian voters as targets for get-out-the-vote efforts  not as voters who first need to be persuaded to support Democrats. For example, party leaders didn't do any research to find what issues were important to black voters. Why? They were already in the tent, weren't they?

It was a major miscalculation. First, with black voters: "Despite historic turnout, even where black voters were key to Democratic successes this past cycle  including in Georgia, Arizona and Michigan  the data show drop-off in support in 2020 compared to 2016 and 2018," the report said. 

Next, with Latino voters: "Drop-off in support among Latino and Hispanic voters were [sic] the lynchpin in Democratic losses in races in Florida, Texas and New Mexico  especially among working-class and non-college voters in these communities," the report said. And then, among Asian voters: "Drop-off in AAPI [Asian American-Pacific Islander] support fueled losses in key races in California, especially among Vietnamese and Filipino voters," the report said. So the party paid a big price for taking its voters for granted.

Third, Democratic leaders, mostly based in coastal cities, assumed their voters were as progressive as they were. In a year in which the Black Lives Matter and Defund the Police movements took hold, Republicans attacked Democrats as proponents of socialism and defunding the police. The problem for Democratic leaders was that some Democratic voters were sympathetic to the GOP message. "In the districts we looked at, those in which 'law and order' or 'socialism' was a continued drumbeat also saw a higher share of Latino/AAPI/black voters who supported the GOP," the report said.

Finally, Democrats thought hatred of President Donald Trump would propel them to victory, not just in the White House, but the House and Senate, too. It didn't work out that way. "Some campaign teams we spoke with felt that the party didn't have a message beyond 'Donald Trump sucks,'" the report said, "and this void led to split-ticket voting for Biden at the top of the ticket and Republicans down ballot (leading to split outcomes in 16 districts nationwide)."

The result was a mess for Democrats competing for House and Senate seats. And much of that mess was created by a Democratic elite that didn't understand  and didn't even try to understand  what was important to the party's voters.

"Folks who purport to speak for the vast communities of color across the country are speaking for one portion of them, usually highly educated urban elites or super-online activists. Those people don't necessarily represent the views of Latino men who work in the oil fields, for instance," top Third Way official Lanae Erickson told National Journal. "What we have done is conflate urban white liberal views with the views of people of color  and allowed them to speak for those people of color."

The report is good news for Republicans. First, it shows that a significant number of Democratic voters are open to at least some GOP messaging. Second, it shows that many Democratic leaders do not understand all of their voters. And third, it shows new outreach opportunities for Republican candidates in 2022  if GOP leaders are smart enough to take advantage of them.


Byron York is chief political correspondent for The Washington Examiner.

COPYRIGHT 2021 BYRON YORK 

Quiz Question   
Based on FBI statistics, what is the approximate annual cost to U.S. victims of cyber-crime?
More Questions
Notable Quote   
 
"Nearly two years after evidence emerged that the infamous Steele dossier was a political dirty trick filled with Russian disinformation and disproved allegations, Special Counsel John Durham unloaded a new indictment that exposes a parallel effort by Hillary Clinton's campaign to flood the FBI with more dubious Trump-Russia collusion dirt.In painstaking detail, Durham laid out in the indictment Thursday…[more]
 
 
—John Solomon, Investigative Journalist, Author, and Chief Executive Officer and Editor in Chief of Just the News
— John Solomon, Investigative Journalist, Author, and Chief Executive Officer and Editor in Chief of Just the News
 
Liberty Poll   

Of the presidents who have presided over the Afghanistan war, which one deserves the worst grade as the U.S. observes the 20th anniversary of 9-11?