As we've highlighted, the dangerous effort to weaken critical patent protections for U.S. pharmaceutical…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: Private Sector Pharmaceutical Investment Propels Innovation

As we've highlighted, the dangerous effort to weaken critical patent protections for U.S. pharmaceutical innovators often minimizes the role of private investment and exaggerates the role of public funding.  This offers a critical corrective at a moment when American drug and vaccine innovation is more important than ever:

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="530"] The Critical Role of Private Pharmaceutical Investment[/caption]…[more]

May 14, 2021 • 09:16 AM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
The Long, Silent Surrender to Radical Islam Print
By Troy Senik
Thursday, April 29 2010
At stake here are not cultural sensitivities. “South Park” has none. At stake is the ability to be controversial in a free society without having to hire bodyguards and food tasters.

“ … To fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting.” – Sun Tzu, The Art of War

“Never murder a man who is committing suicide” – Woodrow Wilson
 

There are times when it is better to live in an intolerant society than in one that doesn’t understand the purpose of tolerance.  Facing an existential threat, the former will survive in misery while the latter will expire in ignorance.  But any civilization that forces one to consider this Morton’s Fork has already revealed a moral failure.
 
Another sign of cultural cowardice? When the lone defenders of free speech against social totalitarianism are the creators of an animated television show starring a group of foul-mouthed elementary school students. Look in your rearview mirror, America. This particular Rubicon is behind you.
 
Trey Parker and Matt Stone, the co-creators of Comedy Central’s alternately profane and profound comedy “South Park,” a show that has traded in irreverence towards every major public figure from Jesus to Barbra Streisand (owners of the two largest fan bases in American life), have found themselves in the literal crosshairs after the show’s 200th episode was set to feature a comparatively anodyne portrayal of the prophet Muhammad.
 
The episode’s plot centered around nearly every celebrity that the show has ever offended joining together in a class-action lawsuit against the city of South Park.  Parker and Stone, congenital provocateurs, used this as an opportunity to revisit a controversy from 2006, when Comedy Central refused to air a portion of a “South Park” episode depicting Muhammad. Coming on the heels of the widespread Muslim violence inspired by Danish newspaper cartoons that portrayed the prophet in an unflattering light, Parker and Stone’s gambit was intended to show solidarity with the principle that free speech cannot be allowed to be suppressed by the threat of force.
 
In the newer episode, “South Park” intended to poke fun at the original controversy and the network’s reaction, having Muhammad appear onscreen in a bear suit, so as not to violate the Islamic prohibition on visual representations of the prophet. In reaction, revolutionmuslim.com, a New York-based jihadist website, suggested that Parker and Stone’s impropriety could result in the pair suffering the same fate as Theo Van Gogh – the Dutch filmmaker whose movie “Submission” chronicled the abuse of women’s rights in the Islamic world.
 
Van Gogh, it should be remembered, was murdered by a Muslim extremist on the streets of Amsterdam.  His assailant shot him eight times in the chest, attempted to decapitate him, and left two knives in his chest, one bearing a five-page manifesto on the violence that awaited those who defy Islam.
 
When the Islamist website posted the address of both Comedy Central and Parker and Stone’s offices – along with a fervent wish that Allah would kill the show’s creators and “burn them in hell for all eternity” – the network decided to defer to the exhortations of the religion of peace. The episode aired with the Muhammad portions edited out.
 
In a high-water mark for Hollywood crassness, Parker and Stone have essentially been abandoned by an entertainment community that prides itself on intellectual independence verging on moral anarchy.  The same creative community that endlessly shops stories of American nefariousness in the Middle East with movies like “Lions for Lambs,” “Syriana,” and “The Green Zone,” has been unable to react with more than a whisper to the notion that defiance of Islam is a predicate for justifiable homicide.  Even “The Simpsons” – one of “South Park’s” comedic forebears – was lukewarm. Bart’s trademark chalkboard gag in last week’s episode found him writing “South Park – We’d Stand Behind You if We Weren’t So Scared.”  So much for the oft-touted “courage” of Hollywood.
 
Parker and Stone’s joke at Muhammad’s expense – like much of “South Park’s” headline-grabbing humor – was doubtlessly in poor taste. But so are the show’s jabs at nearly every aspect of modern society.  The show’s previous shots at Christianity were pointed enough to inspire groans from even the most committed atheist.  But the jabs aired intact and believers mystically managed to subdue the impulse for retributive murder.
 
At stake here are not cultural sensitivities. “South Park” has none.  At stake is the ability to be controversial in a free society without having to hire bodyguards and food tasters. As an isolated phenomenon, this would be troubling. As a microcosmic representation of how Islamists would like to see the entire world operate, it is a front in the war for civilization. An ideology confident of its superiority would present a united front against this specter and blame the terrorists.  A wilting West would blame the cartoonists.

Quiz Question   
What was the last year in which gold was used as the basis for valuing the U.S. dollar?
More Questions
Notable Quote   
 
"We've heard calls in recent years for an ever-widening category of 'terrorists' to encompass groups from the Jan. 6 rioters to antifa to the the Ku Klux Klan. So it is surprising that the White House and the media have referred to the Colonial Pipeline ransomware attackers simply as 'hackers.' 'DarkSide' is not just a collection of hackers -- it's a group of terrorists. And the only thing more concerning…[more]
 
 
—Jonathan Turley, George Washington University Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law and Practicing Criminal Defense Attorney
— Jonathan Turley, George Washington University Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law and Practicing Criminal Defense Attorney
 
Liberty Poll   

Which one of the following do you view as the greatest threat to the U.S. economy as we recover from the coronavirus disruption?