In recent days, we at CFIF have marked the ignominious one-year anniversary of the Biden Administration…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Drug Price Controls: On 9/13, Let's End the Indefensible 9-13 Small Molecule/Large Molecule Protection Disparity

In recent days, we at CFIF have marked the ignominious one-year anniversary of the Biden Administration's misnamed "Inflation Reduction Act" (IRA) by noting its particularly negative impact on pharmaceutical innovation and, in turn, the nation's health and wellbeing.

As acknowledged by the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security  as well as groups like the American Cancer Society, Americans are already confronting alarming and unprecedented drug shortages in the wake of the IRA.

To mark today's date of September 13 - or 9/13 - it's appropriate to note a different but significant 9-13:  That refers to the indefensible distinction that the IRA makes between what are known as "small-molecule" and "large-molecule" drugs.

Specifically, the IRA imposes destructive price controls…[more]

September 13, 2023 • 03:24 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Making Homelessness a Valid Lifestyle Choice Is Wrong Print
By Betsy McCaughey
Wednesday, May 10 2023
A person who "chooses" street living, instead of shelter or hospitalization, is exposed to hypothermia, disease and crime. … Allowing that choice is neither compassionate to the homeless nor fair to the rest of society.

Americans must not surrender to the new normal of squalor and urban chaos  of tent encampments, public defecation, panhandling and shouting schizophrenics.

In the aftermath of Jordan Neely's tragic death on a New York subway, advocates for the homeless and most Democratic politicians are demanding unfettered freedom for the homeless to live on the streets, even with mental illness. 

Advocates are taking over subway stations and dominating the mainstream media with their demands. Too little is being said about the needs of the quiet majority.

People who go to a job every day or operate a business or take their kids to school need safe sidewalks and public transportation. 

Yet Democrats in the Oregon state legislature are pushing a bill to guarantee the homeless the right to sue for $1,000 if they are harassed or removed from a public space.

Democratic lawmakers in California recently defeated a ban on homeless encampments within 500 feet of a school, playground or youth center. So, it's OK for kindergarteners to have to step over syringes and navigate buckets of urine on their way into school?

Even after Michelle Go was pushed to sudden death off a Times Square subway platform by a mentally ill homeless person in 2022, the New York Civil Liberties Union continues to say, "we must not lock people with mental health issues away in hospitals" and "allow police officers to simply sweep homeless people out of the subways so they are kept out of sight."

New York Times opinion columnist Jamelle Bouie railed this week that "we are living through a vicious campaign of demonization and hostility toward the homeless" with "prominent voices" advocating "sweeping homeless people from the streets like trash." Bouie is wrong. The opposite is true. The loudest voices are demanding "rights" for the homeless, but not for the rest of us. 

The National Coalition for the Homeless considers local laws against panhandling and sidewalk camping as violations of the constitutional rights of the unhoused.

What about rights for Pedro Morales, an Austin, Texas, small-business owner? A homeless encampment has popped up in the alley next to the building he owns. "I have to clean up somebody else's mess," he explains.

Same is true of Edy Perez, who owns an auto repair business in Los Angeles. The homeless have set up a sprawl of tents nearby. Once customers see that, they never come back, he complains.

Urban homelessness emerged as a problem in the 1980s, in part because civil libertarians demanded that mental hospitals be closed. The number of patients living in state hospitals across the nation plunged from 535,000 in 1960 to 137,000 by 1980. The mentally ill wound up on the streets.

The problem worsened when the Obama administration and homeless advocates won a lawsuit to prevent Boise, Idaho, from outlawing camping on sidewalks and public parks. Obama's Justice Department deemed homelessness a legally protected lifestyle choice. Ridiculous.

A person who "chooses" street living, instead of shelter or hospitalization, is exposed to hypothermia, disease and crime. On average, a homeless person survives only to age 48, losing 30 years of a normal lifespan. It's worse for women.

Allowing that choice is neither compassionate to the homeless nor fair to the rest of society. 

Kudos to a handful of Democratic politicians who are bucking their party to advocate for involuntarily hospitalizing the mentally ill homeless. 

In New York City, Mayor Eric Adams is employing teams of EMS workers and health professionals to get the mentally ill homeless off the streets and subways and into hospitals. Predictably, the mainstream press are slamming Adams' policy for violating the "civil rights" of the homeless.

In Portland, Oregon, Democratic Mayor Ted Wheeler is pushing to loosen the state's involuntary commitment law, making it easier to hospitalize the homeless against their will. 

Neely's death is igniting a nationwide debate over homelessness  the only good to come out of the tragedy. If he had been hospitalized for mental illnesses, maybe he'd be alive today.

Seize this moment to speak up and denounce the delusional argument that street living is a "right." It dooms the homeless to short, brutal lives, and the rest of us to filth, crime and chaos.


Betsy McCaughey is a former lieutenant governor of New York and chairman of the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths. 

COPYRIGHT 2023 CREATORS.COM

Notable Quote   
 
"The 2024 presidential election is over a year away, but the left's legal assault on common-sense election integrity measures has already begun.Last month, a district court in San Antonio ruled that Texas cannot enforce the provision of Senate Bill 1 which established a voter identification requirement for mail in voting in Texas. The next day, a district court in Atlanta ruled against Georgia Senate…[more]
 
 
— Chad Ennis, Vice President of Honest Elections Project
 
Liberty Poll   

In your opinion, how likely is a federal government shutdown at the end of September, based on budgetary and other disagreements in the fractured House of Representatives?