Generally speaking and on a wide array of pressing issues, Congressman Darrell Issa (R – California…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Potential Appointment of Rep. Darrell Issa to IP Subcommittee Leadership Raises Concern

Generally speaking and on a wide array of pressing issues, Congressman Darrell Issa (R – California) has proven a reliable leader who maintains solid support among conservatives and libertarians.

The prospect of Rep. Issa leading the House Judiciary Committee’s Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet Subcommittee, however, has sparked significant opposition and pushback from intellectual property (IP) proponents.  And for sound reasons.

For example, in urging new House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R – Ohio) not to select Rep. Issa for the role, IPWatchdog’s Paul Morinville lists a litany of concerns based upon Issa’s record:

Issa is the wrong person for the job and has demonstrated that since he joined Congress.  He has sponsored and cosponsored…[more]

January 23, 2023 • 10:13 AM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's Courtroom Legal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts
CFIF Submits Formal Comment on NIST Proposed Rule Regarding Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 Print
By CFIF Staff
Monday, April 12 2021

Last week, the Center for Indvidiual Freedom (CFIF) submitted a formal Comment with the U.S. Commerce Department's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on its Proposed Rule regarding the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, which granted universities, nonprofit organizations and small business the right to patent and license inventions funded partly by federal funding. 

The Economist magazine called the Bayh-Dole Act "Possibly the most inspired piece of legislation to be enacted in America over the past half century," and rightfully so.  It unleashed a tidal wave of hundreds of thousands of patents issued to American universities and research institutes since then. 

On that basis, CFIF supports the Proposed Rule to the extent that it advances the provisions and intent of Bayh-Dole, with the caveat that insertion of the terms "exclusively" and "of the contractor" in the Proposed Rule's text may open the door for advocates of drug price controls to suggest that business decisions of pharmaceutical innovators regarding the pricing of commercial goods and services arising from the practical application of inventions may serve as one basis for exercising march-in rights.  Neither the text nor the intent of the Bayh-Dole Act allow that, as namesake Senators Bayh and Dole themselves pointed out in a joint statement to The Washington Post

On that basis we urge that the Proposed Rule omit those terms.  We must ensure that Bayh-Dole's four-decade legacy of incredible success continues, without the looming threat that activists may attempt to use it to impose destructive drug price controls on American consumers.

Read CFIF's comment here (PDF).

Related Articles :
Quiz Question   
In what year did Congress pass the Uniform Monday Holiday Bill?
More Questions
Notable Quote   
 
"A group of 25 states on Thursday filed a federal lawsuit against the Biden administration, arguing a recent rule allowing retirement plan managers to factor environmental and social issues into investment decisions violated the law.The lawsuit -- led by Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes and joined by 24 other states including Louisiana, Texas and Virginia -- challenges a Department of Labor (DOL)…[more]
 
 
—Thomas Catenacci, FOX Business
— Thomas Catenacci, FOX Business
 
Liberty Poll   

Although early in Kevin McCarthy's tenure as House Speaker, how would you grade him on his performance thus far?