America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
So-Called "Railway Safety Act" Constitutes a Political Handout to Big Labor That Does Nothing to Improve Safety At All

America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains a pillar of our economy.

Unfortunately, a destructive proposal before Congress misleadingly named the "Railway Safety Act" (RSA), part of broader surface transportation reauthorization, threatens great harm to our railroads.

Simply put, the bill has nothing to do with improving safety, but has a lot to do with advancing the political agenda of Big Labor.  At a moment when inflation burdens American families and fragile supply chains remain vulnerable to disruption, the last thing our economy or rail sector need is another costly federal mandate imposed upon one of the nation’s most important transportation sectors.

As an initial matter, as noted by The Wall Street Journal, the…[more]

May 20, 2026 • 04:28 PM
Notable Quotes
 
On the President's Own Words on Immigration:
 
 

"President Obama is poised to ignore stark warnings that executive action on immigration would amount to 'violating our laws' and would be 'very difficult to defend legally.'

"Those warnings came not from Republican lawmakers but from Mr. Obama himself.

"For years, he has waved aside the demands of Latino activists and Democratic allies who begged him to act on his own, and he insisted publicly that a decision to shield millions of immigrants from deportation without an act of Congress would amount to nothing less than the dictates of a king, not a president."

 
 
— Michael D. Shear, The New York Times White House Correspondent
— Michael D. Shear, The New York Times White House Correspondent
Posted November 18, 2014 • 12:48 PM
 
 
On Missing Legal Opinion for Immigration Executive Order:
 
 

"If the White House press corps wants to keep government honest, here's a question to ask as President Obama prepares to legalize millions of undocumented immigrants by executive order: Has he sought, and does he have, any written legal justification from the Attorney General and the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) for his actions?

"This would be standard operating procedure in any normal Presidency. ...

"It's possible Messrs. Obama and Holder haven't sought an immigration opinion because they suspect there's little chance that even a pliant Office of Legal Counsel could find a legal justification. Prosecutorial discretion is a vital legal concept, but it is supposed to be exercised in individual cases, not to justify a refusal to follow the law against entire classes of people."

 
 
— The Editors, The Wall Street Journal
— The Editors, The Wall Street Journal
Posted November 17, 2014 • 01:03 PM
 
 
On the President's Environmental Pact with China:
 
 

"President Obama flew to China a few days ago and announced a joint environmental pact with the communist regime. The United States will reduce its carbon emissions substantially over the next 11 years. China will do absolutely nothing but hope that its emissions decline after 2030.

"The press heralded this as a major accomplishment. The rush from the press as soon as it was announced suggested a high level of coordination. Like lemmings in a staged dive off a cliff, 'historic' became the media's rallying cry. There is nothing historic about the deal. In fact, news reports from November 2012 noted that China expected, in 2012, that its carbon emissions would begin to decline after 2030 because of factory upgrades, efficiencies, etc.

"Like so much of President Obama's decisions over the past six years, this is another photo-op with a compliant press that does not matter and will do little."

 
 
— Erick Erickson, RedState.com Editor-in-Chief
— Erick Erickson, RedState.com Editor-in-Chief
Posted November 14, 2014 • 01:01 PM
 
 
On ObamaCare and the 'Stupidity of the American Voter':
 
 

"'Stupid is as stupid does' -- Forrest Gump


"R
epublicans should save the clip of Jonathan Gruber and run it over and over again in the run-up to the 2016 election. This attitude that government is better at making decisions than you are because you are too stupid to know what is good for you is a hallmark of patronizing, arrogant and condescending liberalism."

 
 
— Cal Thomas, Syndicated Columnist
— Cal Thomas, Syndicated Columnist
Posted November 13, 2014 • 12:49 PM
 
 
On 'Stupid Americans' and ObamaCare:
 
 

"Yet another video has emerged of MIT professor and Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber calling Americans 'stupid,' and bragging about how the Affordable Care Act's drafters had to deceive the public in order to pass the law.

"Fox News' Megyn Kelly was the first to air the video on her program, 'The Kelly File.' ...

"Kelly reported, 'more video has surfaced showing this was not the first time Mr. Gruber called the American people stupid in an '€˜off-the-cuff'€™ remark. In this next clip from also last year, Mr. Gruber explains how Democrats played with the language of the Obamacare law so that it achieved their goals, by again, fooling the stupid public.'

"She then played a short 5-second clip of Gruber, saying the following, that a part of the Obamacare passed because 'the American people are too stupid to understand the difference.'"

 
 
— Alex Griswold, The Daily Caller
— Alex Griswold, The Daily Caller
Posted November 12, 2014 • 12:55 PM
 
 
On Reining In the Internal Revenue Service:
 
 

"The day after Republicans won solid majorities in the House and Senate, House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Majority Leader-to-be Mitch McConnell outlined priorities for the newly elected Congress. High on the list is fundamental tax reform. In addition to overhauling the federal tax code, however, Congress should rein in the Internal Revenue Service.

"Much has already been learned about the arrogance of the IRS from the House investigations of the agency's targeting of conservatives. The revelations emerged despite strenuous efforts by Democrats in Washington and by the IRS itself to block inquiries and deny the existence of political targeting -- targeting that the former head of the IRS Exempt Organizations Unit, Lois Lerner, eventually acknowledged and apologized for in May 2013.

"Bringing the IRS to heel can start with re-energizing and expanding congressional investigations and holding accountable those responsible for the targeting and other abuses."

 
 
— Cleta Mitchell, Foley & Lardner Partner Representing Multiple Organizations Targeted by the IRS
— Cleta Mitchell, Foley & Lardner Partner Representing Multiple Organizations Targeted by the IRS
Posted November 11, 2014 • 01:07 PM
 
 
On Obama's Makeover of the Judiciary:
 
 

"With Republicans in control of the Senate for the first time since Barack Obama took office, the president may find it harder to appoint left-wing lawyers to judgeships. Whether he compromises on some of his nominees, including any to the Supreme Court, may depend on the willingness of the new Republican majority to engage the president on judicial philosophy. ...

"That Republicans now control the Senate means, of course, that they control the confirmation process. Their majority enables them to stop an unacceptable nomination at various points: They can deny the nominee a committee hearing; they can vote the person down in committee; they can refuse to schedule a vote on a nomination sent to the floor; and the full Senate can vote to reject the nomination. The Republicans' majority status also strengthens their negotiating position with the White House, making it more likely that a mutually acceptable candidate will be chosen for a given seat.

"How Obama approaches judicial selection -- and how Republicans respond -- now becomes an important story and will remain so until the Senate shuts down judicial confirmations, probably in the summer of 2016 if Senate custom in presidential-election years is followed."

 
 
— Terry Eastland, The Weekly Standard Executive Editor
— Terry Eastland, The Weekly Standard Executive Editor
Posted November 10, 2014 • 12:19 PM
 
 
On How Congressional Republicans Should Seize the Day:
 
 

"The 2014 election has given the GOP the rare opportunity to retroactively redeem its brand. The conventional perception, incessantly repeated by Democrats and the media, is that Washington dysfunction is the work of the Party of No. Expose the real agent of do-nothing. Show that, when Harry Reid can no longer consign House-passed legislation to oblivion, Congress can actually work.

"Pass legislation. When Obama signs, you've shown seriousness and the ability to govern. When he vetoes, you've clarified the differences between party philosophies and prepared the ground for 2016.

"Tuesday's victory was big. But it did nothing more than level the playing field and give you a shot. Take it."

 
 
— Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist
— Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist
Posted November 07, 2014 • 12:40 PM
 
 
On the President's Losing Political Formula:
 
 

"So why, after prior successes, did Obama's race/class/gender attack finally sputter out like the French at Waterloo?

"Unhappy voters thought the anemic economy, Obamacare, the collapse of U.S. foreign policy, the scandals in government, and the incompetent handling of everything from the Islamic State to Ebola were the only real issues. Democrats'€™ refusal to acknowledge them did not make these failures go away.

"Nor did Americans believe that Republicans had been waging war on minorities, women, or gays -- especially given that Republicans have held the House only since 2011 and have been out of power in the Senate and presidency since 2009.

"After three elections, voters finally caught on that Obama's faults were not in the stars, but in himself. They apparently tired of the usual distractions from a dismal presidential record."

 
 
— Victor Davis Hanson, Hoover Institution Senior Fellow and Nationally Syndicated Columnist
— Victor Davis Hanson, Hoover Institution Senior Fellow and Nationally Syndicated Columnist
Posted November 06, 2014 • 01:07 PM
 
 
On the Message of the 2014 Midterm Elections:
 
 

"As Democratic losses mounted in Senate races across the country on election night, some liberal commentators clung to the idea that dissatisfied voters were sending a generally anti-incumbent message, and not specifically repudiating Democratic officeholders. But the facts of the election just don't support that story.

"Voters replaced Democratic senators with Republicans in Arkansas, Colorado, Iowa, North Carolina, Montana, South Dakota, West Virginia, and likely in Alaska, and appear on track to do so in a runoff next month in Louisiana. At the same time, voters kept Republicans in GOP seats in heavily contested races in Georgia, Kansas, and Kentucky. That is at least ten, and as many as a dozen, tough races, without a single Republican seat changing hands. Tuesday's voting was a wave alright -- a very anti-Democratic wave....

"In the end, Tuesday's vote represented a repudiation of virtually every notion Democrats embraced in recent weeks as they tried to disregard the growing evidence that they were headed for a historic defeat. Now, the vote is in, and the voters' message can no longer be discounted."

 
 
— Byron York, The Washington Examiner Chief Political Correspondent
— Byron York, The Washington Examiner Chief Political Correspondent
Posted November 05, 2014 • 12:56 PM
 
Notable Quote   
 
"For the last two months, President Trump's rhetoric on Iran has seesawed between expressing optimism on negotiations and making explicit threats to remove the mullahs from power.This week, Trump has returned to pugilistic mode, boasting of the strikes that quickly followed a regime drone attack on a US Apache helicopter -- and warning, 'We're going to hit them hard again.'Yet as long as Trump sees…[more]
 
 
— Mark Dubowitz and Miad Maleki, Foundation for Defense of Democracies
 
Liberty Poll   

Does the current political environment of overt hostility toward any opposite viewpoint make you want to engage more or retreat from personal involvement?