America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
So-Called "Railway Safety Act" Constitutes a Political Handout to Big Labor That Does Nothing to Improve Safety At All

America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains a pillar of our economy.

Unfortunately, a destructive proposal before Congress misleadingly named the "Railway Safety Act" (RSA), part of broader surface transportation reauthorization, threatens great harm to our railroads.

Simply put, the bill has nothing to do with improving safety, but has a lot to do with advancing the political agenda of Big Labor.  At a moment when inflation burdens American families and fragile supply chains remain vulnerable to disruption, the last thing our economy or rail sector need is another costly federal mandate imposed upon one of the nation’s most important transportation sectors.

As an initial matter, as noted by The Wall Street Journal, the…[more]

May 20, 2026 • 04:28 PM
Notable Quotes
 
On Fears that "Taxing the Rich" Will Raise Taxes on the Middle Class:
 
 

"During the 2011 debate on combining tax hikes and spending to reduce the deficit by $2.5 trillion, Scott Rasmussen's polling found that 75% of Americans were convinced that any deal in Congress would actually increase taxes on the middle class. 

"Even with the president promising to tax only the rich, why did 75% of Americans believe they were the ultimate targets of any threatened tax hike? The history of trickle-down taxation over the last 100 years and the last two Democratic administrations suggests an answer.

"The Alternative Minimum Tax was imposed in 1969 because 115 households investing in municipal bonds reportedly paid little or no federal income tax. This tax on the rich who were paying what the president and others call a 'fair share' now affects four million households. On Jan. 1, 2013, it is set to hit 27 million more -- raising an estimated $120 billion, according to the Obama 2013 budget. In 40 years, a tax on 115 households will have grown to threaten 31 million."

 
 
— Grover Norquist, Americans for Tax Reform President
— Grover Norquist, Americans for Tax Reform President
Posted April 17, 2012 • 07:41 AM
 
 
On the Projected 10-Year Cost of ObamaCare:
 
 

"How much will ObamaCare -- call it the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act if you like -- cost over the next 10 years? 

"More than you've been led to believe, reports Charles Blahous of George Mason University's Mercatus Center. To be specific, he projects it will add $1,160 billion to net federal spending over the next 10 years and at least $340 billion to federal budget deficits in that time. 

"Blahous was appointed by Barack Obama as one of two public trustees of the Social Security and Medicare programs. He worked on these issues in George W. Bush's administration and submitted his Mercatus paper for anonymous peer review."

 
 
— Michael Barone, Washington Examiner Senior Political Analyst
— Michael Barone, Washington Examiner Senior Political Analyst
Posted April 16, 2012 • 07:39 AM
 
 
On Real Moms of the GOP vs. the White House SOP:
 
 

"The authenticity of conservative women has always been under attack by radical orthodox feminists, but perhaps not as brazenly as by someone with such direct and frequent access to the corridors of the White House message machine as Hilary B. Rosen.
 
"The D.C. career lobbyist and Democratic media strategist took to CNN's airwaves this week to craft a left-wing 'War on Women' attack on the real moms of the GOP. Ostensibly aiming at Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney for his 'old-fashioned' views of women, Rosen's mouth instead shot off in the direction of wife, stay-at-home mother of five, grandmother of 16, and cancer and multiple sclerosis survivor Ann Romney. Mrs. Romney, sneered Rosen, 'never worked a day in her life' outside of the home and should have no voice on women's issues.
 
"President Obama never met a payroll in his life, but that hasn't stopped him from dictating what business owners across the country should and shouldn't be doing. But I digress."

 
 
— Michelle Malkin, Syndicated Columnist
— Michelle Malkin, Syndicated Columnist
Posted April 13, 2012 • 07:44 AM
 
 
On the Obama Team's Divisive Campaign Strategy:
 
 

"If Obama can cobble together disaffected young people, greens, women, minorities and the poor -- who all believe a nefarious 'they' have crushed their dreams -- then massive debt and deficits, high unemployment, sluggish growth and spiraling gas prices won't decide the election. 

"Lots of presidential candidates have run by identifying such enemies of the people, rather than debating the general state of the nation -- sometimes successfully, sometimes not. 

"But the problem with an us/them strategy is not just winning an election, but trying to put back together what was torn asunder."

 
 
— Victor Davis Hanson, Hoover Institution Senior Fellow and Nationally Syndicated Columnist
— Victor Davis Hanson, Hoover Institution Senior Fellow and Nationally Syndicated Columnist
Posted April 12, 2012 • 07:52 AM
 
 
On the Perils of Depending on Government Problem-Solving:
 
 

"I'm suspicious of superstitions, like astrology or the belief that 'green jobs will fix the environment and the economy.' I understand the appeal of such beliefs. People crave simple answers and want to believe that some higher power determines our fates. 

"The most socially destructive superstition of all is the intuitively appealing belief that problems are best solved by government. ...

"If Americans keep voting for politicians who want to spend more money and pass more laws, the result will not be a country with fewer problems but a country that is governed by piecemeal socialism. We can debate the meaning of the word 'socialism,' but there's no doubt that we'd be less prosperous and less free."

 
 
— John Stossel, Author and Award-Winning News Correspondent
— John Stossel, Author and Award-Winning News Correspondent
Posted April 11, 2012 • 07:34 AM
 
 
On the Administration's Cooked Jobs Books:
 
 

"In March, 120,000 jobs were created, while more than 330,000 people dropped out of the workforce. For self-serving reasons, the Obama administration spins this as good news. 

"According to government math, March unemployment declined by .1 percent even though more Americans were out of work. This is because the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) doesn’t count people as officially unemployed if they are not looking for a job. So even though the 'not in labor force' figure is at a record high of nearly 88 million people, the administration can keep reporting a drop in unemployment by counting only those it wants to count. ...

"The government naturally wants to put as good a face on the ostensible recovery as possible, but the official unemployment figures are painfully out of step with reality. If three Americans are quitting the workforce for every one who finds a job, this is not a recovery. It is a national jobs crisis."

 
 
— The Editors, The Washington Times
— The Editors, The Washington Times
Posted April 10, 2012 • 08:02 AM
 
 
On Funding the Egyptian Government:
 
 

"In October 2010, on the eve of the Islamic revolution that the media fancies as 'the Arab Spring,' the Supreme Guide of the Muslim Brotherhood called for jihad against the United States.   

"You might think that this all but unnoticed bombshell would be of some importance to policymakers in Washington. It was not. It is not. This week, the Obama administration quietly released $1.5 billion in foreign aid to the new Egyptian government, now dominated by a Brotherhood-led coalition in parliament — soon to be joined by an Ikhwan (i.e., Brotherhood) luminary as president.  

"It is not easy to find the announcement. With the legacy media having joined the Obama reelection campaign, we must turn for such news to outlets like the Kuwait News Agency. There, we learn that, having dug our nation into a $16 trillion debt hole, President Obama has nevertheless decided to borrow more money from unfriendly powers like China so he can give it to an outfit that views the United States as an enemy to be destroyed."

 
 
— Andrew C. McCarthy, National Review Institute Senior Fellow
— Andrew C. McCarthy, National Review Institute Senior Fellow
Posted April 09, 2012 • 08:07 AM
 
 
On the President's Stated Energy Policy:
 
 

"Romney is right to suggest that Obama is saying things he doesn’t believe in order to get reelected. But, at least on energy, he’s not taking a new position. When you’re the incumbent president, you can say that your position is whatever you want. But the truth of the matter isn’t determined by what you say, but by what you do. And judged against what he is doing, Obama's all-of-the-above strategy isn’t a policy change, it’s just a lie."

 
 
— Jonah Goldberg, National Review Online Editor-at-Large
— Jonah Goldberg, National Review Online Editor-at-Large
Posted April 06, 2012 • 07:38 AM
 
 
On the President's Supreme Court Challenge:
 
 

"It appears to be unprecedented ... for a U.S. president to have attacked the Supreme Court before it handed down its decision. Some think Mr. Obama and his progressive infantry are trying to intimidate the Justices, specifically Justice Anthony Kennedy. But most legal commentary has said the president's attack is likely to anger the justices, perhaps including some of the court's liberals. Mr. Obama's notion of judicial review diminishes all the members of any court, not just its conservatives. It doesn't help the always difficult struggle for an independent judiciary in other countries if an American president is issuing Venezuela-like statements on U.S. courts."

 
 
— Daniel Henninger, The Wall Street Journal
— Daniel Henninger, The Wall Street Journal
Posted April 05, 2012 • 08:01 AM
 
 
On Presidential Prevarication and Political Word Games:
 
 

"One of the highly developed talents of President Barack Obama is the ability to say things that are demonstrably false, and make them sound not only plausible but inspiring. ... 

"Now there are different kinds of liars. If we must have lying Presidents of the United States, I prefer that they be like Richard Nixon. You could just look at him and tell that he was lying. 

"But Obama is much smoother. On this and on many other issues, you would have to know what the facts are to know that he is lying. He is obviously counting on the fact that, in this era of dumbed-down education, many people have no clue as to what the facts are. ... 

"It would be hard to become nostalgic about Richard Nixon, who was forced to resign in disgrace. But at least you could tell when he was lying. Obama's lies are just as big but not as visible, and the media that exposed Nixon is covering for Obama."

 
 
— Thomas Sowell, Economist, Author and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow
— Thomas Sowell, Economist, Author and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow
Posted April 04, 2012 • 07:53 AM
 
Notable Quote   
 
"The funniest thing about the Graham Platner (D) Senate campaign in Maine, aside from its forcing progressives into wildly unflattering rhetorical pretzels, is that it proves the moral panics over 'white supremacy' and 'toxic masculinity' were never sincere. They were only ever about smearing conservatives.For the last 11 years, activists in politics, news media, and academia have linked even the…[more]
 
 
— Becket Adams, Journalist and Media Critic
 
Liberty Poll   

Does the current political environment of overt hostility toward any opposite viewpoint make you want to engage more or retreat from personal involvement?