| |
On Attorney General Holder's Culpability in Operation Fast and Furious: |
|
| |
"Mr. Attorney General, you have made numerous statements about Fast and Furious that have eventually been proven to be untrue. Your lack of trustworthiness while speaking about Fast and Furious has called into question your overall credibility as Attorney General. The time for deflecting blame and obstructing our investigation is over. The time has come for you to come clean to the American public about what you knew about Fast and Furious, when you knew it, and who is going to be held accountable for failing to shut down a program that has already had deadly consequences, and will likely cause more casualties for years to come.
"Operation Fast and Furious was the Department’s most significant gun trafficking case. It related to two of your major initiatives – destroying the Mexican cartels and reducing gun violence on both sides of the border. On your watch, it went spectacularly wrong. Whether you realize yet or not, you own Fast and Furious. It is your responsibility." |
|
| |
— Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA), House Committee on Oversight and Reform Chairman, in an October 9, 2011 Letter to Attorney General Eric Holder
|
|
|
— Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA), House Committee on Oversight and Reform Chairman, in an October 9, 2011 Letter to Attorney General Eric Holder
|
|
Posted October 11, 2011 • 08:19 AM
|
|
|
| |
On How the TV Debates Have Shaped the 2012 Presidential Race: |
|
| |
"The debates have overwhelmed the Republican race. 'They are about all there's been to the campaign,' says Fox political commentator Brit Hume. After each debate the campaign has been frozen until the next one, except for arguments over issues spawned by the debates themselves. ...
"For Republicans, a campaign dominated by televised debates has two disadvantages. It puts the folks they loathe, the press, in control. The media can dwell on subjects such as tax cuts for the rich or social issues that one or more of the candidates would prefer not to discuss. They are hard pressed to squeeze their talking points into the dialogue. Mr. Obama gets a pass.
"Since the media pit the candidates against each other, Mr. Obama's strategists get an early glimpse of the vulnerabilities of the Republican candidates, their strengths and weaknesses on issues, and the attacks used most effectively against them. All Mr. Obama has to do is sit back and enjoy the show."
|
|
| |
— Fred Barnes, The Weekly Standard Executive Editor
|
|
|
— Fred Barnes, The Weekly Standard Executive Editor
|
|
Posted October 10, 2011 • 08:00 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Reid's Senate Rules Rout: |
|
| |
"In a shocking development Thursday evening, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) triggered a rarely used procedural option informally called the “nuclear option” to change the Senate rules.
Reid and 50 members of his caucus voted to change Senate rules unilaterally to prevent Republicans from forcing votes on uncomfortable amendments after the chamber has voted to move to final passage of a bill.
Reid’s coup passed by a vote of 51-48, leaving Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) fuming." |
|
| |
— Alexander Bolton, The Hill
|
|
|
— Alexander Bolton, The Hill
|
|
Posted October 07, 2011 • 08:10 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Difference Between the Wall Street Protesters and the Tea Partiers: |
|
| |
"I am not the first to note the vast differences between the Wall Street protesters and the tea partiers. To name three: The tea partiers have jobs, showers and a point. ...
"The tea partiers didn't arrogantly claim to be drafting a new Declaration of Independence. They're perfectly happy with the original.
"Tea partiers didn't block traffic, sleep on sidewalks, wear ski masks, fight with the police or urinate in public. They read the Constitution, made serious policy arguments, and petitioned the government against Obama's unconstitutional big government policies, especially the stimulus bill and Obamacare.
"Then they picked up their own trash and quietly went home. Apparently, a lot of them had to be at work in the morning." |
|
| |
— Ann Coulter, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
|
— Ann Coulter, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
Posted October 06, 2011 • 08:09 AM
|
|
|
| |
On The Washington Post's Version of Rock, Paper, Scissors: |
|
| |
"Is there a clumsier group of newspaper character assassins than the hit squads at The Washington Post? On Oct. 1, the Post was back on the racist-Republican attack with a 3,000 word, investigative treatise over a rock. Specifically, Gov. Rick Perry had leased a property where the N-word was painted on a rock, and then he had it painted over with white paint. ...
"Three thousand words on this.
"Apparently, investigative reporting at the Post means staring at old rocks under paint (with a microscope?) to discern almost invisible letters and suggesting this should ruin a presidential campaign. It resembles the Post feverishly fumbling through foreign-language dictionaries trying to find a racially defamatory definition for 'macaca' to torpedo Sen. George Allen's re-election in 2006." |
|
| |
— Brent Bozell, Media Research Center Founder and President
|
|
|
— Brent Bozell, Media Research Center Founder and President
|
|
Posted October 05, 2011 • 08:08 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the President of Contempt: |
|
| |
"What is it that Mr. Obama doesn't like about the United States -- a country that sent him hurtling like an American Idol contestant from the obscurity of an Illinois Senate seat to the presidency in a mere four years?
"I suspect it's the same thing that so many run-of-the-mill liberals dislike: Americans typically believe that happiness is an individual pursuit; we bridle at other people setting limits on what's 'enough'; we enjoy wealth and want to keep as much of it as we can; we don't like trading in our own freedom for someone else's idea of virtue, much less a fabricated concept of the collective good." |
|
| |
— Bret Stephens, The Wall Street Journal
|
|
|
— Bret Stephens, The Wall Street Journal
|
|
Posted October 04, 2011 • 08:04 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Unintended But Predictable Consequences of Sen. Durbin's Debit Card 'Swipe Fee' Amendment to Last Yesr's Dodd-Frank Bill: |
|
| |
"After Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., successfully added his 'swipe fee' amendment to last year's Dodd-Frank financial regulation bill, he promised, 'By requiring debit card fees to be reasonable ... small businesses and their customers will be able to keep more of their own money.' That was the theory, at least.
"But big banks didn't become big by eating billion-dollar losses. Last week Bank of America announced it will start charging customers a $5 fee every month they make at least one debit transaction. And BofA is not alone. Wells Fargo, Chase and SunTrust are all instituting similar versions of the 'Durbin fee.' Washington Mutual says it is not adding any debit fees, but is tightening restrictions on free checking accounts. The bottom line is that whatever extra cash retailers are picking up from debit card transactions, consumers are losing from banks." |
|
| |
— Conn Carroll, Washington Examiner Senior Editorial Writer
|
|
|
— Conn Carroll, Washington Examiner Senior Editorial Writer
|
|
Posted October 03, 2011 • 07:57 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Playing the Political Blame Game: |
|
| |
"... Obama is not an FDR, nor a Lincoln, nor a liberal Reagan. At this point he’s simply hoping not to be a Carter. And that’s fomented establishment despair. Tina Brown, editor of both the Daily Beast and Newsweek, recently let it slip on MSNBC (a trifecta of establishmentarian liberal media outlets!) that she thinks Obama 'wasn’t ready' for the job in 2008.
"The establishment can’t bring itself to blame liberalism (or themselves). So instead they blame the system. Obama’s own reelection theme of running against 'Washington' — a town he had near total control over for two years and in which he is still the most powerful figure — is a variant of the same argument. Obama can’t blame the party he leads, so he blames the 'system.'" |
|
| |
— Jonah Goldberg, National Review OnLine Editor-at-Large
|
|
|
— Jonah Goldberg, National Review OnLine Editor-at-Large
|
|
Posted September 30, 2011 • 07:41 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Postmodern Class Warfare: |
|
| |
"Class warfare is now not about brutal elemental poverty of the sort Charles Dickens or Knut Hamsun once wrote about. It is too often the anger that arises from not having something that someone else has, whether or not such style, privilege or discretionary choices are all that necessary. Endemic obesity, not malnutrition, threatens America -- including the nearly 50 million Americans who are on food stamps.
"These are hard times, with high unemployment rates and economic stagnation. But we are not a nation of the malnourished and starving who are preyed upon by idle rich drones who pay no taxes. And a government that borrows $4 billion a day and spends $2 trillion more a year than it did just 10 years ago is hardly stingy." |
|
| |
— Victor Davis Hanson, Hoover Institution Senior Fellow and Nationally Syndicated Columnist
|
|
|
— Victor Davis Hanson, Hoover Institution Senior Fellow and Nationally Syndicated Columnist
|
|
Posted September 29, 2011 • 08:03 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Evolution of President Obama's Divisive Politics: |
|
| |
"In 2004, Illinois State Senator Barack Obama gave us a window into his vision for American leadership. He said, 'Now even as we speak, there are those who are preparing to divide us — the spin masters, the negative ad peddlers who embrace the politics of "anything goes." Well, I say to them tonight, there is not a liberal America and a conservative America — there is the United States of America. There is not a Black America and a White America and Latino America and Asian America — there’s the United States of America.'
"Now, seven years later, President Obama prepares to divide our nation to achieve re-election. This is not a leadership style, this is a re-election strategy. Telling those who are scared and struggling that the only way their lives can get better is to diminish the success of others. Trying to cynically convince those who are suffering that the American economic pie is no longer a growing one that can provide more prosperity for all who work hard. Insisting that we must tax and take and demonize those who have already achieved the American Dream. That may turn out to be a good re-election strategy for President Obama, but is a demoralizing message for America. What happened to State Senator Obama? When did he decide to become one of the 'dividers' he spoke of so eloquently in 2004? There is, of course, a different choice." |
|
| |
— Governor Chris Christie (R), New Jersey
|
|
|
— Governor Chris Christie (R), New Jersey
|
|
Posted September 28, 2011 • 07:43 AM
|
|
|
|