| |
On Former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey's Potential Legal Liability: |
|
| |
"The latest Twitter disclosures have raised potential legal liability for Twitter and its executives. No one appears more at risk than Twitter's former CEO Jack Dorsey
"It is an ironic turn of events since Dorsey supported the takeover by Elon Musk and has called for all files to be released without filtering. Dorsey has the feel of a 'designated degendant,' someone who was pushed forward by others to take any legal hit.
"On its face, Dorsey has vulnerability after the latest release. He was repeatedly asked by members of Congress about censoring and shadow-banning, which has now been confirmed in these files."
Read the entire article here. |
|
| |
— Jonathan Turley, the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University
|
|
|
— Jonathan Turley, the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University
|
|
Posted December 12, 2022 • 08:32 AM
|
|
|
| |
Reporting on U.S. Senator Kyrsten Sinema's (AZ) Decision to Change Her Party Affiliation from Democrat to Independent: |
|
| |
"Arizona Sen. Kyrsten Sinema is changing her party affiliation to independent, delivering a jolt to Democrats' narrow majority and Washington along with it.
"In a 45-minute interview, the first-term senator told POLITICO that she will not caucus with Republicans and suggested that she intends to vote the same way she has for four years in the Senate. 'Nothing will change about my values or my behavior,' she said.
"Provided that Sinema sticks to that vow, Democrats will still have a workable Senate majority in the next Congress, though it will not exactly be the neat and tidy 51 seats they assumed. They're expected to also have the votes to control Senate committees. And Sinema's move means Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) -- a pivotal swing vote in the 50-50 chamber the past two years -- will hold onto some but not all of his outsized influence in the Democratic caucus.
"Sinema would not address whether she will run for reelection in 2024, and informed Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer of her decision on Thursday.
"'I don't anticipate that anything will change about the Senate structure,' Sinema said, adding that some of the exact mechanics of how her switch affects the chamber is 'a question for Chuck Schumer ... I intend to show up to work, do the same work that I always do. I just intend to show up to work as an independent.'
"She said her closely held decision to leave the Democratic Party reflects that she's 'never really fit into a box of any political party' -- a description she said also applies to her fiercely independent state and millions of unaffiliated voters across the country."
Read the entire article here. |
|
| |
— Burgess Everett, Congressional Bureau Chief for POLITICO
|
|
|
— Burgess Everett, Congressional Bureau Chief for POLITICO
|
|
Posted December 09, 2022 • 08:34 AM
|
|
|
| |
Reporting on the U.S. Housing Market: |
|
| |
"This has been a year of watershed moments in real estate, and not the good kind.
"The Housing Market Index, a closely watched industry metric that gauges the outlook for home sales, declined to 33 in November on a hundred-point scale, its lowest level in a decade, save for the first dystopian month of the pandemic. Anything under 50 spells trouble.
"A month earlier, interest rates on a standard 30-year mortgage passed 7 percent, capping the largest single-year increase in at least 50 years."
Read the entire article here. |
|
| |
— Daniel de Visé, The Hill
|
|
|
— Daniel de Visé, The Hill
|
|
Posted December 08, 2022 • 08:22 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Moore v. Harper, an Election-Related Case Before the U.S. Supreme Court: |
|
| |
"The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments this week in the biggest sleeper case of its 2022-23 term.
"The justices already have before them the blockbuster dispute of whether government-funded or -run colleges and universities can continue to use race in making admissions decisions, testing whether the court will live up to the Constitution's promise of equal protection of the laws and that the government will treat its citizens as individuals without regard to race. But the Supreme Court also has before it a potentially earth-shaking case involving governmental structure in addition to individual rights.
"Moore v. Harper asks the justices to decide whether a state court can impose its own map for congressional districts drawn after the decennial census. It will test whether the Supreme Court will honor the Constitution's text, rather than past practice, with implications for the control not just over congressional districting (which helped Republicans win the House in the most recent midterm elections) but also the selection of presidential electors. If a true dispute arose over the results of the 2024 election, Moore v. Harper might provide the touchstone for a state legislative role in determining the winner."
Read the entire article here. |
|
| |
— John Yoo, Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of California at Berkeley, and Robert Delahunty, a Fellow of the Claremont Institute's Center for the American Way of Life in Washington, D.C.
|
|
|
— John Yoo, Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of California at Berkeley, and Robert Delahunty, a Fellow of the Claremont Institute's Center for the American Way of Life in Washington, D.C.
|
|
Posted December 07, 2022 • 08:14 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Free Speech: |
|
| |
"One of the old saws of censorship apologists is that without a government directing the suppression of free speech, it is not censorship.
That is clearly untrue. Many groups like the ACLU stress that 'censorship can be carried out by the government as well as private pressure groups.'
The same figures insist that if, there is not a violation of the First Amendment (which only applies to the government), there is no free speech violation.
The First Amendment was never the exclusive definition of free speech. Free speech is viewed by many of us as a human right; the First Amendment only deals with one source for limiting it. Free speech can be undermined by private corporations as well as government agencies.
Corporations clearly have free speech rights."
Read the entire article here. |
|
| |
— Jonathan Turley, the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University
|
|
|
— Jonathan Turley, the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University
|
|
Posted December 06, 2022 • 08:15 AM
|
|
|
| |
On a New Law in New York Requiring Websites, Blogs and Social Media Networks to Have and Post Policies to Deal With What the State Deems Objectionable Speech: |
|
| |
"New York politicians are slapping a badge on my chest. A law going into effect Saturday requires social-media networks, including any site that allows comments, to publish a plan for responding to alleged hate speech by users.
The law blog I run fits the bill, so the law will mandate that I post publicly my policy for responding to comments that 'vilify, humiliate, or incite violence against a group' based on 'race, color, religion, ethnicity, national origin, disability, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression.' It also requires that I give readers a way to complain about my blog's content and obligates me to respond directly.
I don't want to moderate such content and I don't endorse the state's definition of hate speech. I do sometimes delete comments, but I do it based on my own editorial judgment, not state command. Still, I'm being conscripted. By obligating me to do the state's bidding with regard to viewpoints that New York condemns, the law violates the First Amendment."
Read the entire article here. |
|
| |
— Eugene Volokh, Co-founder of the Volokh Conspiracy Blog and a Law Professor at the University of California, Los Angeles
|
|
|
— Eugene Volokh, Co-founder of the Volokh Conspiracy Blog and a Law Professor at the University of California, Los Angeles
|
|
Posted December 05, 2022 • 02:44 PM
|
|
|
| |
Reporting on Florida's Decision to Divest the State's Assets from BlackRock Over the Financial Giant's ESG Policies: |
|
| |
"Florida is divesting from investment giant BlackRock, becoming the latest state to pull assets from the firm over its environment, social, and governance (ESG) policies.
"The Sunshine State's chief financial officer, Jimmy Patronis, announced Thursday that the Florida Treasury would immediately begin removing roughly $2 billion in assets from BlackRock's control in a process that should be completed by year's end.
"'Using Florida's cash to fund BlackRock's social-engineering project isn't something we signed up for,' Patronis tweeted in making the announcement. 'It's got nothing to do with maximizing returns and is the opposite of what an asset manager is paid to do.' ...
"BlackRock and other major financial institutions, like State Street and Vanguard, have spearheaded an effort to promote ESG standards over the last several years. The ESG movement broadly seeks to promote a green energy transition and left-wing social priorities through the financial sector.
"Republican states and groups like the State Financial Officers Foundation (SFOF), though, have waged a war against the ESG movement, arguing that it is anti-democratic and harmful to taxpayers by pushing investments that don't result in maximum earnings for consumers."
Read the entire article here. |
|
| |
— Breck Dumas, Fox Business
|
|
|
— Breck Dumas, Fox Business
|
|
Posted December 02, 2022 • 07:11 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Biden Administration's 'Social Cost of Carbon' Rulemaking: |
|
| |
"With the price of everything from gasoline to food soaring in America, nobody is surprised by inflated price tags these days. But even by Washington standards, an action taken earlier this month by the Environmental Protection Agency is creating sticker shock: a nearly fourfold increase in the government calculation of damages from carbon emissions.
"The so-called Social Cost of Carbon was first set in 2009 under then-President Barack Obama. Under Democrats it has been set for most of the last decade at $51 per metric ton. But in a rulemaking notice in mid-November, EPA said it had devised a new calculation that raises that damage estimate to $190 per metric ton by 2022 standards and as much as $410 by the year 2080.
"The figure isn't just hypothetical. If enacted, it could affect everything from the cost of methane regulations and tailpipe emissions to the 'climate reparations' that President Joe Biden has committed the United States to paying to poor countries in the future.
"The new estimate has sent shockwaves through the energy industry and raised the stakes for ongoing litigation being brought by Republican attorneys general in states like Louisiana that are challenging the Biden administration Social Cost of Carbon rulemaking as unconstitutional."
Read the entire article here. |
|
| |
— John Solomon, Just the News
|
|
|
— John Solomon, Just the News
|
|
Posted December 01, 2022 • 08:34 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Biden’s Hypocrisy on Labor Unions: |
|
| |
"'I intend to be the most pro-union president leading the most pro-union administration in American history,' President Biden promised last year. At least until a rail strike threatened his poll numbers.
"Biden is hammering Congress to enact legislation to effectively outlaw a strike next week by 100,000 railroad freight workers. Unions are threatening a work stoppage to compel railroad owners to provide sick leave.
"Biden declared in April, 'Workers who join a union gain power -- the power over decisions that affect their lives.' But not as much power as the president has over them. And considering how disruptive a strike would be for the national economy, Biden needs to stop it.
"Liberal activists are stunned at Biden's apparent betrayal of rank-and-file workers. But the Democrats' posturing is no surprise. Unions are great -- if someone else pays."
Read the entire article here. |
|
| |
— James Bovard, New York Post
|
|
|
— James Bovard, New York Post
|
|
Posted November 30, 2022 • 08:01 AM
|
|
|
| |
On a New Biden Administration Regulation Permitting Retirement Plan Managers to Offer Investment Options that Consider ESG Issues: |
|
| |
"The White House recently issued a new regulation that will allow investment fiduciaries, including 401(k) plan managers, to offer investment options that consider environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues, such as climate change and social justice initiatives. The move could radically transform retirement investing for tens of millions of Americans nationwide.
"Until now, those managing many retirement accounts were required to prioritize the best return on investment possible. By opening the door to left-wing investment plans, the Biden administration is permitting employers and private pension fund managers to effectively politicize retirement investments.
"Under the new regulation, a retirement account fund manager or employer must continue to pledge to prioritize the interests of retirees, a longstanding requirement, but fiduciaries will now also be allowed to include factors like climate change and other ESG considerations in their analyses and decision-making processes. This will, by design, empower left-wing employers and fund managers to use retirement accounts to push leftist causes."
Read the entire article here. |
|
| |
— Justin Haskins, Executive Editor and Research Fellow at The Heartland Institute
|
|
|
— Justin Haskins, Executive Editor and Research Fellow at The Heartland Institute
|
|
Posted November 29, 2022 • 08:34 AM
|
|
|
|