As a companion must-read article to Tim’s column on the ObamaCare birth control mandate, John Cochrane…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Cato on Contraception Mandate: 'We Should All be Exempt'

As a companion must-read article to Tim’s column on the ObamaCare birth control mandate, John Cochrane of Cato explains why President Barack Obama’s proposed compromise to exempt church-related institutions misses the point:

Our nation is divided on social issues. The natural compromise is simple: Birth control, abortion and other contentious practices are permitted. But those who object don't have to pay for them. The federal takeover of medicine prevents us from reaching these natural compromises and needlessly divides our society.

The critics fell for a trap. By focusing on an exemption for church-related institutions, critics effectively admit that it is right for the rest of us to be subjected to this sort of mandate. They accept the horribly misnamed Patient Protection and Affordable…[more]

February 10, 2012 • 04:52 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
CFIF Urges U.S. Supreme Court to Protect Private Property Print
By CFIF Staff
Thursday, March 26 2009

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 26, 2009

Amicus Brief Urges High Court to Hear Empress Casino Joliet v. Giannoulias

ALEXANDRIA, VA — The Center for Individual Freedom (“CFIF”) last week joined with nine other national and state organizations in filing an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court urging it to grant certiorari in the case of Empress Casino Joliet v. Giannoulias.

At issue in the case is the constitutionality of an Illinois statute that “taxes” just four riverboat casinos in the state for the sole purpose of directly transferring that money to Illinois’ five horse-racing tracks.  Unfortunately, the Illinois Supreme Court recently upheld the statute.  

CFIF’s brief charges that the Illinois statute directly violates the Fifth Amendment’s

Takings Clause and urges the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case and reverse the Illinois High Court’s decision.  Specifically, the brief argues that a “law that forces one segment of an industry to directly support another imposes a taking without just compensation.”

“If allowed to stand, the Illinois statute will improperly impart unprecedented taxing authority on federal, state and local governments to unfairly seize revenues of one industry, or a portion of that industry, and directly transfer them to another,” said Jeffrey Mazzella, CFIF’s president.  “Such authority strikes at the core of the Fifth Amendment, which states that a government taking of private property is only permitted for public use, and only if just compensation is paid.  The Illinois statute circumvents both of those prongs, therefore undermining the very property rights protections that are at the heart of the Fifth Amendment,” Mazzella said.  

Earlier this week, The Wall Street Journal published an editorial on the case in which it suggested the Illinois statute was passed in part as a result of corruption by now-impeached Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich.  “Among the evidence in the Governor's impeachment trial were transcripts of Mr. Blagojevich and his brother Rob discussing some $100,000 in contributions as a quid pro quo for the legislation to benefit the racing industry,” The Wall Street Journal wrote. 

In addition to CFIF, other organizations that signed the brief, initiated by and including the National Taxpayers Union, are the American Association of Small Property Owners, Citizen Outreach, Citizens for Limited Taxation, Evergreen Freedom Foundation, Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, Hawaiian Values, Rio Grande Foundation and Small Business Hawaii.

Question of the Week   
Where does the United States rank in The Heritage Foundation’s 2012 Index of Economic Freedom?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Someone needs to ask Mr. Obama how an increasingly impoverished nation, limping along on food stamps and housing subsidies, is going to pay for the existing beneficiaries, along with 77 million Baby Boomers set to retire in the next 25 years. A president who has impaired the vibrancy of the private sector so badly has long since forfeited the moral high ground."…[more]
 
 
—Mona Charen, Nationally Syndicated Columnist
— Mona Charen, Nationally Syndicated Columnist
 
Liberty Poll   

Should the Obama administration support Israel in a military strike against Iranian nuclear facilities?