CFIF often highlights how the Biden Administration's bizarre decision to resurrect failed Title II "…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: U.S. Internet Speeds Skyrocketed After Ending Failed Title II "Net Neutrality" Experiment

CFIF often highlights how the Biden Administration's bizarre decision to resurrect failed Title II "Net Neutrality" internet regulation, which caused private broadband investment to decline for the first time ever outside of a recession during its brief experiment at the end of the Obama Administration, is a terrible idea that will only punish consumers if allowed to take effect.

Here's what happened after that brief experiment was repealed under the Trump Administration and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai - internet speeds skyrocketed despite late-night comedians' and left-wing activists' warnings that the internet was doomed:

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="515"] Internet Speeds Post-"Net Neutrality"[/caption]

 …[more]

April 19, 2024 • 09:51 AM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Give Warren a BS Degree in Vote-Buying Print
By Betsy McCaughey
Wednesday, April 24 2019
Every dollar loaned inflates tuition by another 60 cents, according to Federal Reserve research.

Presidential contender Elizabeth Warren's strategy is to win the Democratic nomination by promising the most free stuff. Monday, she upped the ante. She's offering a whopping $50,000 student loan forgiveness for nearly everyone who borrowed for college or graduate school. That's old-fashioned Tammany Hall-style bribery  handing out dollars to buy votes.

Warren's proposal is designed to buy a lot of them. One in 6 American adults are saddled with college debt. It's bigger than credit card debt or auto loans. Magically erasing student debt is Warren's ploy to win over college students, adults in their 20s and 30s struggling with their loans and millions of parents left holding the bag.

Warren's giveaway will cost taxpayers $640 billion. It's a poke in the eye of every assembly line worker, waitress, truck driver and other taxpayer who never got to college because they went to work instead of going into debt. Why should they now have to pay someone else's college loans?

Sure, families swamped with college debts deserve sympathy. But Democrats aren't leveling with them or the public about what's causing this problem.

House Financial Services Chair Maxine Waters tries to pin the blame on the banking industry. When Waters had several banking CEOs appearing before her committee, including JPMorgan Chase's Jamie Dimon and Citigroup's Michael Corbat, she demanded their plan to fix the student loan crisis. After an embarrassing silence, they had to remind her that banks no longer make student loans. The Obama administration took over student lending entirely in 2010.

In Monday's announcement, Warren tried to vilify the federal government for "pushing families that can't afford to pay the outrageous costs of higher education towards taking out loans." There's a sliver of truth to that, because Uncle Sam makes loans to virtually all comers, regardless of their ability to repay the money. But Warren leaves out the biggest culprits, the colleges themselves.

Colleges hike their tuition every year because they can. The feds have been willing to increase loan amounts to match whatever colleges charge. The result? Every dollar loaned inflates tuition by another 60 cents, according to Federal Reserve research.

In this heartless scheme, students are mules, carrying dollars from Washington, D.C., to campuses nationwide. Never mind if they ever graduate or land jobs to pay back their loans.

The more money colleges rake in, the more extravagantly they spend. Federal loans help bankroll exorbitant salaries for college presidents. The University of Louisville's president takes in nearly $4.3 million, while Columbia University's president gets $3.9 million. Awash with money, colleges spend way more on nonteaching staff than on teachers. Six-figure salaries for diversity officers, admissions and financial aid managers and layers on layers of other administrators, all on the gravy train.

Yet these high-priced administrators can't manage to get students to graduate. A shocking 34% of public college students can't make it through a four-year program in six years. They fail, still saddled with loans to repay.

Warren wants taxpayers to forgive up to $50,000 in loans for anyone earning under $100,000 a year, with smaller loan forgiveness for higher earners. That's the wrong idea.

Looking ahead, it would be fairer to require colleges to refund a portion of the loan money to Uncle Sam when a student doesn't make it to graduation. Colleges need to have skin in the game so they'll try harder to get students through the course of study and into the working world.

But don't expect to hear that kind of idea from Warren, herself a college professor and member of the ivory tower establishment. Instead, she's proposing more freebies. She's offering free tuition in all public colleges and universities, partly paid for by federal tax dollars and partly by the states  a huge unfunded mandate that will hit state taxpayers hard.

Finally, Warren warns that under her free college plan, all public institutions must admit students regardless of their immigration status or criminal record. Democrats are redefining themselves as the party of ex-cons, illegals and voters who want free stuff.


Betsy McCaughey is a former lieutenant governor of New York State. 
COPYRIGHT 2019 CREATORS.COM

Notable Quote   
 
"A top rabbi at Columbia University and Barnard College is telling students to go home 'as soon as possible,' and remain there for their own safety at this time after anti-Israel protesters attacked Jews and hurled antisemitic threats at them.'What we are witnessing in and around campus is terrible and tragic. The events of the last few days, especially last night, have made it clear that Columbia…[more]
 
 
— Madeleine Hubbard, Just the News
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you mostly approve or mostly disapprove of U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson's plan to introduce foreign aid packages for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan before legislation on U.S. border security?