Generally speaking and on a wide array of pressing issues, Congressman Darrell Issa (R – California…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Potential Appointment of Rep. Darrell Issa to IP Subcommittee Leadership Raises Concern

Generally speaking and on a wide array of pressing issues, Congressman Darrell Issa (R – California) has proven a reliable leader who maintains solid support among conservatives and libertarians.

The prospect of Rep. Issa leading the House Judiciary Committee’s Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet Subcommittee, however, has sparked significant opposition and pushback from intellectual property (IP) proponents.  And for sound reasons.

For example, in urging new House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R – Ohio) not to select Rep. Issa for the role, IPWatchdog’s Paul Morinville lists a litany of concerns based upon Issa’s record:

Issa is the wrong person for the job and has demonstrated that since he joined Congress.  He has sponsored and cosponsored…[more]

January 23, 2023 • 10:13 AM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's Courtroom Legal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts
Cash For Kids, No Work Required Print
By Betsy McCaughey
Wednesday, October 27 2021
University of Chicago economists calculate that the monthly cash payments will encourage 1.5 million parents to quit working.

Democrats used to be the party of working people. Now, they sneer at people who work hard. 

Democrats pushing to pass the Build Back Better bill want a single parent with two kids to be able to take home well over $31,000 in cash and noncash federal benefits a year, tax-free, without having to work. The handouts are even higher in states that offer generous benefits. So why get a job? 

Nonworking adults are already eligible for food stamps, housing vouchers and health care. Now, Democrats want to send them monthly checks if they have kids  up to $300 per kid. The checks, nicknamed "Biden Bucks," originated earlier this year to help tide over families who lost their jobs because of COVID. President Joe Biden's team wants to convert them into a permanent entitlement. House Republicans mock it as "cash-for-kids." 

Everyone wants to help kids, but Republicans and one lone Democratic senator, Joe Manchin, D-West Virginia, oppose handing out cash to able-bodied parents without requiring them to work or train for a job. Democrats and their media allies bash that as cruelty. Washington Post columnist Paul Waldman attacks work requirements as a "time tax and ritual humiliation" on poor people. Really? The rest of us have to work, and there's nothing humiliating about it. 

The political battle over "Biden Bucks" is key to where we as a nation are headed. 

In 1996, President Bill Clinton and a bipartisan majority in Congress passed welfare reform, eliminating cash welfare without work or job preparation. It worked. Child poverty dropped from 13% to less than 4%, and teen pregnancies and welfare dependence plummeted. Democrats want to undo these reforms. 

Biden himself supported the work requirement then, but he says he's adamantly against it now. So much for his blue-collar cred. 

New York Times columnist Paul Krugman admits eliminating the work requirement "represents a philosophical break with the past few decades" and "the obsessive fear that poor people might take advantage of government aid by choosing not to work." 

A fear borne out by social science and common sense. 

University of Chicago economists calculate that the monthly cash payments will encourage 1.5 million parents to quit working. Perhaps they'll spend the next year on the couch, making more babies to up their income from Uncle Sam. 

This week's headlines are about Democrats trimming the Build Back Better bill to reduce the price tag and win the votes of holdouts Manchin and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Arizona. All 50 Democratic senators need to be on board to pass the bill. But don't be misled by proposals to sunset the monthly checks after one year, or five, instead of making them permanent. That reduces the official cost. But once created, entitlements are almost never allowed to sunset. Their funding will be renewed in succeeding years.

America will fast become starkly divided between the hardworking people who foot the bills and the millions on welfare, cheering on politicians to increase the dole. The burden on working people will become intolerable. 

The New York Times has been featuring opinion columns deriding Americans' work ethic. In "8 Hours a Day, Five Days a Week Is Not Working for Us," Bryce Covert argues that a "reduction in work doesn't have to mean a reduction in anyone's living standards." That's la-la-land economics. 

When fewer people work, fewer goods are produced, and they cost more. Inflation.

Americans are shell-shocked already by rising food and fuel prices. They're recalculating how much they can afford and how it will impact their life plans. Yet the Biden team is telling them they have to support able-bodied adults who don't want to work. The reaction should be pure rage. 


Betsy McCaughey is a former lieutenant governor of New York and author of "The Next Pandemic," available at Amazon.com. 

COPYRIGHT 2021 CREATORS.COM

Quiz Question   
In what year did Congress pass the Uniform Monday Holiday Bill?
More Questions
Notable Quote   
 
"A group of 25 states on Thursday filed a federal lawsuit against the Biden administration, arguing a recent rule allowing retirement plan managers to factor environmental and social issues into investment decisions violated the law.The lawsuit -- led by Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes and joined by 24 other states including Louisiana, Texas and Virginia -- challenges a Department of Labor (DOL)…[more]
 
 
—Thomas Catenacci, FOX Business
— Thomas Catenacci, FOX Business
 
Liberty Poll   

Although early in Kevin McCarthy's tenure as House Speaker, how would you grade him on his performance thus far?