In recent days, we at CFIF have marked the ignominious one-year anniversary of the Biden Administration…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Drug Price Controls: On 9/13, Let's End the Indefensible 9-13 Small Molecule/Large Molecule Protection Disparity

In recent days, we at CFIF have marked the ignominious one-year anniversary of the Biden Administration's misnamed "Inflation Reduction Act" (IRA) by noting its particularly negative impact on pharmaceutical innovation and, in turn, the nation's health and wellbeing.

As acknowledged by the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security  as well as groups like the American Cancer Society, Americans are already confronting alarming and unprecedented drug shortages in the wake of the IRA.

To mark today's date of September 13 - or 9/13 - it's appropriate to note a different but significant 9-13:  That refers to the indefensible distinction that the IRA makes between what are known as "small-molecule" and "large-molecule" drugs.

Specifically, the IRA imposes destructive price controls…[more]

September 13, 2023 • 03:24 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
The Washington Fantasy World Print
By Byron York
Wednesday, August 03 2022
The Inflation Reduction Act is not about reducing inflation.

An odd atmosphere has descended on Washington, D.C. At the precise moment the government announced that the economy shrank for the second consecutive quarter  the popular definition of a recession  Washington pundits began talking about what a great week President Joe Biden was having. And they meant it sincerely, not ironically. 

Why was it such a great week? Two reasons, according to the new conventional wisdom. One, the Senate passed a bill providing billions in subsidies to the semiconductor industry. Conservatives denounced the measure as a pork-laden handout to big business and slammed the 16 Republicans in the Senate and 24 in the House who voted for it. But Biden, with unanimous Democratic support in both chambers, said it "will make cars cheaper, appliances cheaper and computers cheaper," as well as "create high-paying manufacturing jobs." The White House portrayed it as a win-win.

The second big thing for Biden was that Capitol Hill Democrats appeared to unify behind a kinda, sorta slimmed-down version of Biden's ill-fated Build Back Better agenda  this time, one that focuses mostly on climate, health care and tax increases, instead of everything, as the original bill did. At somewhere between $400 billion and $700 billion, it's as big a spending bill as Democrats could get past Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, their most moderate member. 

On the other hand, it's unclear whether it will have the support of the other Senate moderate, Arizona's Kyrsten Sinema. And remember, in a 50-50 Senate, with all Republicans opposed  and they will oppose this one  Democrats will have to corral all 50 of their senators to pass the bill with Vice President Kamala Harris breaking the 50-50 tie. So it is not a done deal yet.

Here's what party leaders thought was very, very clever. They named the bill the Inflation Reduction Act. After all, the polls show, and everyone just knows, that a 9.1% annual rate of inflation is the most pressing concern on voters' minds. It is by far the most important issue for this November's midterm elections, and Republicans were just killing Democrats on it. So Democrats decided to claim that their new spending bill, containing expensive measures they have long wanted to pass, is a bold inflation-fighting step.

The name alone appeared to transform Biden White House officials, who until now seemed powerless to deal with raging inflation, into tough-minded inflation fighters. In the past, officials didn't much want to use the I-word when speaking from the White House press room podium. But after the Senate Democratic deal, spokeswoman Karine Jean-Pierre just couldn't stop saying "inflation," over and over, as something the Biden White House is fighting and fighting and fighting. When one reporter called the bill the "reconciliation" bill, referring to the Senate parliamentary maneuver that will have to be used to pass it, Jean-Pierre responded, "We like to call it the Inflation Reduction Act."

But here's the thing. The Inflation Reduction Act is not about reducing inflation. It will not reduce inflation in any significant way. As a matter of fact, the best-informed debate at the moment seems to be about whether it will have zero effect on inflation or actually make inflation worse. 

A new assessment from the University of Pennsylvania's Penn Wharton Budget Model found that the Inflation Reduction Act "would very slightly increase inflation until 2024 and decrease inflation thereafter. These point estimates are statistically indistinguishable from zero, thereby indicating low confidence that the legislation will have any impact on inflation." If you want the real numbers, Penn Wharton estimated the bill would increase inflation by 0.05% up until 2024 and then reduce inflation by 0.25% "by the late 2020s." Again, the estimates are "not statistically different than zero."

But, of course, reducing inflation is not the point. Saying the bill will reduce inflation is the point. "The word 'inflation' or variations show up no fewer than 11 times in Sen. Machin's statement announcing the outline of his agreement with Leader Schumer," notes the National Taxpayers Union Foundation. Beyond repeating the bill's name, Biden seems to be mostly ignoring the supposedly inflation-fighting features of the Inflation Reduction Act. On Friday, he tweeted: "The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 invests billions in the climate crisis. I'm talking about rebates for sustainable choices, tax credits for electric vehicles, investments in environmental justice. All while lowering costs and creating thousands of clean energy jobs." OK, but what about reducing inflation?

So even if Sinema is on board and Democrats can pass the bill on a 50-50 tie, plus the vice president's vote  even if all that happens, it would be nice to think the Inflation Reduction Act would actually reduce inflation, wouldn't it? In reality, that appears to be entirely irrelevant.

Why? Because before the bill has even passed  and, of course, it still hasn't  the media declarations of a Biden comeback began. First came the assertions that the recession might not really be a recession at all. The night before the GDP numbers came out, Politico announced that the figure would be "possibly inaccurate and certain to be revised." The next day, Politico declared a Biden victory: "Somehow, someway, Joe Biden is back in the game. After enduring a brutal year, Biden is suddenly on the verge of a turnaround that, the White House believes, could salvage his summer  and alter the trajectory of his presidency."

Remember  this was the week the U.S. economy slipped into recession. The New York Times published a story headlined, "The Wind Is at Biden's Back for a Change. Will Voters Care?" And Axios touted "Biden's success story," arguing that the president has "slowly but substantially re-engineered significant parts of the American economy." That assessment was based in part on the passage of the semiconductor bill and the possible-but-not-assured passage of the Inflation Reduction Act.

A few days later, Biden would score a genuine success with the U.S. killing of al-Qaida leader and 9/11 planner Ayman al-Zawahiri, for which he received deserved and bipartisan praise. But much of Washington was already eager to declare him the Comeback Kid. Inflation is being fought! The semiconductor bill! Manchin on board! Recession  NOT! If it seems strangely detached from your own experiences and priorities, well, you're probably like millions of other Americans, at least those outside Washington.

 Byron York is chief political correspondent for The Washington Examiner


Notable Quote   
"The 2024 presidential election is over a year away, but the left's legal assault on common-sense election integrity measures has already begun.Last month, a district court in San Antonio ruled that Texas cannot enforce the provision of Senate Bill 1 which established a voter identification requirement for mail in voting in Texas. The next day, a district court in Atlanta ruled against Georgia Senate…[more]
— Chad Ennis, Vice President of Honest Elections Project
Liberty Poll   

In your opinion, how likely is a federal government shutdown at the end of September, based on budgetary and other disagreements in the fractured House of Representatives?