As we at CFIF often highlight, strong intellectual property (IP) rights - including patent rights -…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Senate Must Support Strong Patent Rights, Not Erode Them

As we at CFIF often highlight, strong intellectual property (IP) rights - including patent rights - constitute a core element of "American Exceptionalism" and explain how we became the most inventive, prosperous, technologically advanced nation in human history.  Our Founding Fathers considered IP so important that they explicitly protected it in the text of Article I of the United States Constitution.

Strong patent rights also explain how the U.S. accounts for an incredible two-thirds of all new lifesaving drugs introduced worldwide.

Elected officials must therefore work to protect strong IP and patent rights, not undermine them.   Unfortunately, several anti-patent bills currently before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee this week threaten to do exactly…[more]

April 02, 2025 • 08:29 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
CFIF Urges U.S. Supreme Court to Protect Private Property Print
By CFIF Staff
Thursday, March 26 2009

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 26, 2009

Amicus Brief Urges High Court to Hear Empress Casino Joliet v. Giannoulias

ALEXANDRIA, VA — The Center for Individual Freedom (“CFIF”) last week joined with nine other national and state organizations in filing an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court urging it to grant certiorari in the case of Empress Casino Joliet v. Giannoulias.

At issue in the case is the constitutionality of an Illinois statute that “taxes” just four riverboat casinos in the state for the sole purpose of directly transferring that money to Illinois’ five horse-racing tracks.  Unfortunately, the Illinois Supreme Court recently upheld the statute.  

CFIF’s brief charges that the Illinois statute directly violates the Fifth Amendment’s

Takings Clause and urges the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case and reverse the Illinois High Court’s decision.  Specifically, the brief argues that a “law that forces one segment of an industry to directly support another imposes a taking without just compensation.”

“If allowed to stand, the Illinois statute will improperly impart unprecedented taxing authority on federal, state and local governments to unfairly seize revenues of one industry, or a portion of that industry, and directly transfer them to another,” said Jeffrey Mazzella, CFIF’s president.  “Such authority strikes at the core of the Fifth Amendment, which states that a government taking of private property is only permitted for public use, and only if just compensation is paid.  The Illinois statute circumvents both of those prongs, therefore undermining the very property rights protections that are at the heart of the Fifth Amendment,” Mazzella said.  

Earlier this week, The Wall Street Journal published an editorial on the case in which it suggested the Illinois statute was passed in part as a result of corruption by now-impeached Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich.  “Among the evidence in the Governor's impeachment trial were transcripts of Mr. Blagojevich and his brother Rob discussing some $100,000 in contributions as a quid pro quo for the legislation to benefit the racing industry,” The Wall Street Journal wrote. 

In addition to CFIF, other organizations that signed the brief, initiated by and including the National Taxpayers Union, are the American Association of Small Property Owners, Citizen Outreach, Citizens for Limited Taxation, Evergreen Freedom Foundation, Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, Hawaiian Values, Rio Grande Foundation and Small Business Hawaii.

Notable Quote   
 
"Will this law review article 'promote DEI values'? Does it cite scholars from 'underrepresented groups'? Will it have 'any foreseeable impact in enhancing diversity, equity, and inclusion'? And why did one team of editors solicit 'only white, male authors'?Those are some of the questions that editors at the Harvard Law Review asked in internal documents obtained by the Washington Free Beacon. The…[more]
 
 
— Aaron Sibarium, Washington Free Beacon
 
Liberty Poll   

Should any "peace" agreement with Iran specifically and unconditionally force the country to halt all nuclear development?