America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
So-Called "Railway Safety Act" Constitutes a Political Handout to Big Labor That Does Nothing to Improve Safety At All

America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains a pillar of our economy.

Unfortunately, a destructive proposal before Congress misleadingly named the "Railway Safety Act" (RSA), part of broader surface transportation reauthorization, threatens great harm to our railroads.

Simply put, the bill has nothing to do with improving safety, but has a lot to do with advancing the political agenda of Big Labor.  At a moment when inflation burdens American families and fragile supply chains remain vulnerable to disruption, the last thing our economy or rail sector need is another costly federal mandate imposed upon one of the nation’s most important transportation sectors.

As an initial matter, as noted by The Wall Street Journal, the…[more]

May 20, 2026 • 04:28 PM
Notable Quotes
 
On the Midwest's Cut-and-Run Democrats:
 
 

"First lady Michelle Obama said, 'Let's Move!' Who knew Democratic politicians in Wisconsin and Indiana would take her literally? 

"Faced with stifling debt, bloated pensions and intractable government unions, liberal Midwestern legislators have fled those states -- paralyzing Republican fiscal reform efforts. Like Monty Python's Brave Sir Robin and his band of quivering knights, these elected officials have only one plan when confronted with political hardship or economic peril: Run away, run away, run away."

 
 
— Michelle Malkin, Author, Syndicated Columnist
— Michelle Malkin, Author, Syndicated Columnist
Posted February 23, 2011 • 07:28 AM
 
 
On the Democrats' Badger State Blunder:
 
 

"It is becoming clear that the Wisconsin battle was a strategic political blunder for President Obama and the Democratic Party. The decision by the Democratic Party and its allies to draw a line in the sand in Wisconsin was the wrong strategy, in the wrong state, at the wrong time, on the wrong issue, and executed in the wrong way. 

"The White House, which for the last two years seemed so tone deaf over health care, jobs, and the economy, may again be displaying a stunning political miscalculation. Unless the Democrats pull the plug on their ill-conceived Wisconsin campaign, the statewide and national backlash now beginning to emerge may continue to resonate all the way to the 2012 presidential elections ... 

"For in the end, the images and messages tell the story. The showdown in Madison pits pampered public employees against hard-pressed taxpayers. It portrays union workers as an angry mob against those seeking orderly legislative deliberation. It paints Democratic lawmakers as outlaws on the run, undermining the democratic process. It launched a national debate about the generous salaries and benefits for government workers during a time of economic shortages. And it showcased school teachers who abandoned their children in favor of narrow, partisan political gain. 

"This is a bad unraveling of a political campaign."

 
 
— Richard Pollock, Pajamas Media Washington, D.C., Editor and PJTV Bureau Chief
— Richard Pollock, Pajamas Media Washington, D.C., Editor and PJTV Bureau Chief
Posted February 22, 2011 • 08:32 AM
 
 
On New Jersery's Trend-Setting Governor:
 
 

"In 2009, the country witnessed Chris Christie, who at the time was relatively unknown outside of New Jersey, defeat Democrat incumbent Jon Corzine for the governorship. Then it watched  Christie declare a 'state of fiscal emergency.' Then it watched him propose major spending cuts and give the proverbial middle finger to teachers’ unions. 

"Now, Christie’s playbook has become standard reading for many of the Republican governors that were elected in 2010."

 
 
— Amanda Carey, The Daily Caller
— Amanda Carey, The Daily Caller
Posted February 21, 2011 • 09:17 AM
 
 
On President Obama's Historic Budget Misperception:
 
 

"Obama fancies his happy talk, debt-denial optimism to be Reaganesque. It's more Louis XV. Reagan begat a quarter-century of prosperity; Louis, the deluge.

Moreover, unlike Obama, Louis had the decency to admit he was forfeiting the future. He never pretended to be winning it."

 
 
— Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist
— Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist
Posted February 18, 2011 • 08:51 AM
 
 
On the President's Proposed Spending Cuts:
 
 

"In November 2010, the voters rejected the vast increase in the size and scope of government of the Obama Democrats. They had increased domestic discretionary spending by 24 percent, and by more than 80 percent if you count the stimulus package. 

"Now the president is trying to salvage most of what was intended to be a permanent increase of government's share of the economy by calling for dribs and drabs of cuts and freezing total discretionary spending at a much higher level than ever before."

 
 
— Michael Barone, Principal Co-Author, The Almanac of American Politics and Washington Examiner Senior Political Analyst
— Michael Barone, Principal Co-Author, The Almanac of American Politics and Washington Examiner Senior Political Analyst
Posted February 17, 2011 • 08:26 AM
 
 
On the Mainstream Media's Budget Fantasy Land:
 
 

"One major reason we're in this fiscal morass is our national media. Forget any real cuts. For decades now, any attempt to even try to trim 'increases in growth' in entitlements like Medicare have been trashed by the media as 'draconian cuts.'  

"Our top reporters have spent the last two years letting Barack Obama spew the insanity that he could add millions of uninsured people to the government's health-insurance programs and simultaneously cut the deficit. Now they're calling him responsible for 'deep cuts.' They truly live in a parallel universe." 

 
 
— Brent Bozell, Media Research Center Founder and President
— Brent Bozell, Media Research Center Founder and President
Posted February 16, 2011 • 08:18 AM
 
 
On President Obama's Budget Proposal:
 
 

"This was supposed to be the moment we were all waiting for. After three years of historic deficits that have added almost $4.5 trillion to the national debt, President Obama was finally going to get serious about fiscal discipline. Instead, what landed on Congress's doorstep on Monday was a White House budget that increases deficits above the spending baseline for the next two years. Hosni Mubarak was more in touch with reality last Thursday night."

 
 
— The Editors, The Wall Street Journal
— The Editors, The Wall Street Journal
Posted February 15, 2011 • 08:14 AM
 
 
On the Administration's High-Speed Train to More Deficit Spending:
 
 

"Vice President Biden, an avowed friend of good government, is giving it a bad name. With great fanfare, he went to Philadelphia last week to announce that the Obama administration proposes spending $53 billion over six years to construct a 'national high-speed rail system.' Translation: The administration would pay states $53 billion to build rail networks that would then lose money - lots - thereby aggravating the budget squeezes of the states or federal government, depending on which covered the deficits.

"There's something wildly irresponsible about the national government undermining states' already poor long-term budget prospects by plying them with grants that provide short-term jobs. Worse, the rail proposal casts doubt on the administration's commitment to reducing huge budget deficits. The president's 2012 budget is due Monday. How can it subdue deficits if it keeps proposing big spending programs?"

 
 
— Robert J. Samuelson, Newsweek and Washington Post Contributing Editor
— Robert J. Samuelson, Newsweek and Washington Post Contributing Editor
Posted February 14, 2011 • 08:12 AM
 
 
On the Growth of Federal Debt Under Obama:
 
 

"The old bromide that citizens elect presidents for protection from other people's congressmen was reversed last November when a Congress was elected for protection from the president. This week House Republicans have been debating how to cut the ballooning budget. After ramming through an expansion of federal spending to levels not approached since World War II, President Obama is now calling for still more spending, with a renewed emphasis on infrastructure, that he claims will create jobs and economic growth. 

"Let's put this in perspective: With the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) now projecting a federal budget deficit this year of $1.5 trillion, Mr. Obama is on course to add as much debt in one term as all 43 previous presidents combined. Not surprisingly, the rating agency Standard & Poor's is warning of a Treasury downgrade."

 
 
— Michael J. Boskin, Stanford University Professor of Economics, Hoover Institution Senior Fellow and Former Council of Economic Advisors Chairman (George H.W. Bush)
— Michael J. Boskin, Stanford University Professor of Economics, Hoover Institution Senior Fellow and Former Council of Economic Advisors Chairman (George H.W. Bush)
Posted February 11, 2011 • 08:49 AM
 
 
On Good Economics and the Presidency:
 
 

"The true lesson to be learned from the Reagan presidency is that good economics isn't Republican or Democrat, right-wing or left-wing, liberal or conservative. It's simply good economics. President Barack Obama should take heed and not limit his vision while seeking a workable solution to America's tragically high unemployment rate."

 
 
— Arthur B. Laffer, Economist, Laffer Associates Chairman and Former Reagan Economic Policy Advisory Board Member
— Arthur B. Laffer, Economist, Laffer Associates Chairman and Former Reagan Economic Policy Advisory Board Member
Posted February 10, 2011 • 08:57 AM
 
Notable Quote   
 
"When California Gov. Gavin Newsom's former chief of staff Dana Williamson pleaded guilty last month to three felonies pertaining to campaign finance fraud and federal tax evasion, the governor told Bloomberg News he was shaken -- but philosophical. The news had come as a shock, he said, before adding that justice must be served.'We've all got to be held to the letter of the law,' Newsom declared.…[more]
 
 
— Susan Crabtree, Political Correspondent for RealClearPolitics
 
Liberty Poll   

Does the current political environment of overt hostility toward any opposite viewpoint make you want to engage more or retreat from personal involvement?