America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
So-Called "Railway Safety Act" Constitutes a Political Handout to Big Labor That Does Nothing to Improve Safety At All

America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains a pillar of our economy.

Unfortunately, a destructive proposal before Congress misleadingly named the "Railway Safety Act" (RSA), part of broader surface transportation reauthorization, threatens great harm to our railroads.

Simply put, the bill has nothing to do with improving safety, but has a lot to do with advancing the political agenda of Big Labor.  At a moment when inflation burdens American families and fragile supply chains remain vulnerable to disruption, the last thing our economy or rail sector need is another costly federal mandate imposed upon one of the nation’s most important transportation sectors.

As an initial matter, as noted by The Wall Street Journal, the…[more]

May 20, 2026 • 04:28 PM
Notable Quotes
 
On the President's Credibility:
 
 

"This just  in ... new polling data indicate that the President's credibility may now, in fact, be 'shovel-ready.'"

 
 
— Cartoonist Bruce Tinsley's "Mallard Fillmore"
— Cartoonist Bruce Tinsley's "Mallard Fillmore"
Posted November 05, 2010 • 08:30 AM
 
 
On the Midterm Election and Government Spending:
 
 

"On Tuesday voters rejected President Obama's attempt to remake America in the image of an imploding Europe - not just by overwhelmingly electing Republican candidates in the House, but by preferring dozens of maverick conservatives who ran against establishment Washington.

"Why the near-historic rebuke? Out-of-control spending, unchecked borrowing, vast new entitlements and unsustainable debt - all at a time of economic stagnation.

"So what is next? Like the recovering addict who checks himself into rehab, a debt-addicted America just snapped out of its borrowing binge, is waking up with the shakes, and hopes there is still a chance at recovery.

"It won't be easy..."

 
 
— Victor Davis Hanson, Hoover Institution Senior Fellow and Nationally Syndicated Columnist
— Victor Davis Hanson, Hoover Institution Senior Fellow and Nationally Syndicated Columnist
Posted November 04, 2010 • 08:23 AM
 
 
On Democrats' Calls for Compromise After the Midterm Election:
 
 

"As voters who have been maligned by the ruling majority as stupid, unwashed, racist, selfish, and violent headed to the polls Tuesday, Democrats released 'talking points' attacking Republican leaders who 'are not willing to compromise.' But 'no compromise' is exactly the message that un-American Americans delivered to Washington this campaign season: 

"No more compromising deals behind closed doors. No more compromising bailouts in times of manufactured crisis. No more compromising conservative principles for D.C. party elites. No more compromising the American economy for left-wing special interests. No more compromising transparency and ethics for bureaucratic self-preservation.

"Let us be clear, in case it hasn’t fully sunk into the minds of Obama and the trash-talking Democrats yet: You can take your faux olive branch and shove it. Thank you."

 
 
— Michelle Malkin, Syndicated Columnist
— Michelle Malkin, Syndicated Columnist
Posted November 03, 2010 • 08:39 AM
 
 
On the Importance of Exercising One's Right to Vote:
 
 

“Let each citizen remember at the moment he is offering his vote that he is not making a present or a compliment to please an individual — or at least that he ought not so to do; but that he is executing one of the most solemn trusts in human society for which he is accountable to God and his country.”

 
 
— Samuel Adams, 1781 Boston Gazette
— Samuel Adams, 1781 Boston Gazette
Posted November 02, 2010 • 08:16 AM
 
 
On Predictions of GOP Gains in the House of Representatives:
 
 

"The final Gallup Poll before President Obama's first midterm elections Tuesday indicates Republicans are poised to reap historic gains in the House of Representatives, possibly electing twice as many new members as they need to seize control of the chamber where financial legislation originates.

"Gallup's latest findings this morning predict Republicans will easily gain the necessary 39 seats to seize control of the House regardless of voter turnout. They predict a minimum GOP gain of 60 seats 'with gains well beyond that possible.' That kind of rout would be the worst shellacking of a president's party in a half-century."

 
 
— Andrew Malcolm, Los Angeles Times
— Andrew Malcolm, Los Angeles Times
Posted November 01, 2010 • 08:41 AM
 
 
On the 2010 Crossroads Election:
 
 

"Most elections are about particular policies, particular scandals or particular personalities. But these issues don't mean as much this year-- not because they are not important, but because this election is a crossroads election, one that can decide what path this country will take for many years to come... 

"We have a strange man in the White House. This election is a crossroads, because either his power will be curbed by depriving him of his huge Congressional majorities or he will continue on a road that jeopardizes both our freedom and our survival."

 
 
— Thomas Sowell, Economist, Author and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow
— Thomas Sowell, Economist, Author and Hoover Institution Senior Fellow
Posted October 29, 2010 • 08:47 AM
 
 
On the Coming Midterm Election Verdict:
 
 

"Next Tuesday Democrats will receive a crushing rebuke. More to the point, voters will be delivering a verdict on the first two years of the Obama administration...

"In recent days, Mr. Obama screamed defiantly to Democratic rallies that Republicans have to 'sit in the back,' and he told a Latino radio audience that it's time to 'punish our enemies and . . . reward our friends.' That may be the president's idea of how to appeal to Americans' better instincts. Next Tuesday night we'll see how badly wrong he is."

 
 
— Karl Rove, Former White House Senior Advisor and Deputy Chief of Staff
— Karl Rove, Former White House Senior Advisor and Deputy Chief of Staff
Posted October 28, 2010 • 08:17 AM
 
 
On the Tea Party's Pursuit of Liberty:
 
 

"... In 50 years in politics, I have never seen as large a percentage of the public self-motivated for reformation. For those of us who believe we are a providential country, now is the chance for the public to demonstrate it. 

"If the tea partiers and other liberty lovers continue to engage Washington next year, then government shutdowns can work, vetoes can be overridden and public opinion can be rallied to help defeat Obamacare, higher taxes and deficits. If our public does not stay engaged, then the ever-organized left will force the GOP back into Washington as usual politics -- and our chance to reform our government will die. Let's prove the Washington cynics in both parties wrong. As it has in the last few years, the tea party movement must continue to provide both the backbone and the vision for the Washington GOP."

 
 
— Tony Blankley, Author, Syndicated Columnist and Former Washington Times Editorial Page Editor
— Tony Blankley, Author, Syndicated Columnist and Former Washington Times Editorial Page Editor
Posted October 27, 2010 • 08:35 AM
 
 
On the Impact of the Tea Party in the 2010 Midterm Elections and Beyond:
 
 

"More than half, or 54 percent, of Americans believe the tea party movement has been a good thing for the U.S. political system, our new survey revealed. Only 22 percent say that it is a bad thing, while 19 percent say it has made no difference. 

"This agrees with other recent polls. Fifty-five percent of Americans said that the tea party movement can be effective in making major changes in Washington in the near future, according to the most recent ABC News/Yahoo! News poll...

"Independent estimates have shown that the movement has the potential to elect up to 100 House members and at least potentially six new senators, from Florida, Utah, Kentucky, Colorado, Alaska and maybe and Nevada.

"It is clear from our polling over the past 18 months – and certainly during this campaign – that rather than being a flash-in-the-pan, the tea party movement has the potential not only to play a big role in November, but to be decisive in the Republican nominating process in 2012. As well as in electing the next president."

 
 
— Scott Rasmussen, Rasmussen Reports President and Democratic Pollster Douglas Schoen
— Scott Rasmussen, Rasmussen Reports President and Democratic Pollster Douglas Schoen
Posted October 26, 2010 • 08:31 AM
 
 
On the Truth Behind "Big-Money" in Elections:
 
 

"Team Obama’s message in the closing weeks of the campaign was completely eclipsed Friday by a union official who openly boasted in a story reported by The Wall Street Journal: 'We don’t like to brag,' but 'we’re the big dog' when it comes to campaign funding. 

"Big as in $87.5 million. Big as in the biggest spender of any outside group -- all meant to protect the interests of unions, the new 'privileged class.' But wait a minute: Team O led us to believe that honor went to the vilified U.S. Chamber of Commerce and all of its alleged contributions from 'foreign money' sponsors.

"A record $87.5 million has been spent by one union, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, to elect Democrats. Paid not by voluntary contribution from its members, but by forced union dues from workers -- who are paid by taxpayers."

 
 
— Mark McKinnon, Maverick Media President
— Mark McKinnon, Maverick Media President
Posted October 25, 2010 • 08:01 AM
 
Notable Quote   
 
"When California Gov. Gavin Newsom's former chief of staff Dana Williamson pleaded guilty last month to three felonies pertaining to campaign finance fraud and federal tax evasion, the governor told Bloomberg News he was shaken -- but philosophical. The news had come as a shock, he said, before adding that justice must be served.'We've all got to be held to the letter of the law,' Newsom declared.…[more]
 
 
— Susan Crabtree, Political Correspondent for RealClearPolitics
 
Liberty Poll   

Does the current political environment of overt hostility toward any opposite viewpoint make you want to engage more or retreat from personal involvement?