America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
So-Called "Railway Safety Act" Constitutes a Political Handout to Big Labor That Does Nothing to Improve Safety At All

America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains a pillar of our economy.

Unfortunately, a destructive proposal before Congress misleadingly named the "Railway Safety Act" (RSA), part of broader surface transportation reauthorization, threatens great harm to our railroads.

Simply put, the bill has nothing to do with improving safety, but has a lot to do with advancing the political agenda of Big Labor.  At a moment when inflation burdens American families and fragile supply chains remain vulnerable to disruption, the last thing our economy or rail sector need is another costly federal mandate imposed upon one of the nation’s most important transportation sectors.

As an initial matter, as noted by The Wall Street Journal, the…[more]

May 20, 2026 • 04:28 PM
Notable Quotes
 
On Demonizing the Loyal Opposition:
 
 

"Now the liberals run the government and they're using their power to implement their radical agenda. Mr. Obama and his party believe that the election of November 2008 entitled them to make permanent, 'transformational' changes to our society. In just 16 months they've added more than $2 trillion to the national debt, essentially nationalized the health-care system, the student-loan industry, and have their sights set on draconian cap-and-trade regulations on carbon emissions and amnesty for illegal aliens.

"Had President Obama campaigned on this agenda, he wouldn't have garnered 30% of the popular vote.

"Like the millions of citizens who've peacefully risen up and attended thousands of rallies in protest, I seek nothing more than the preservation of the social contract that undergirds our society. I do not hate the government, as the left does when it is not running it. I love this country. And because I do, I insist that the temporary inhabitants of high political office comply with the Constitution, honor our God-given unalienable rights, and respect our hard-earned private property. For this I am called seditious, among other things, by some of the very people who've condemned this society?"

 
 
— Rush Limbaugh, Nationally Syndicated Talk-Show Host, in a Wall Street Journal Op-Ed
— Rush Limbaugh, Nationally Syndicated Talk-Show Host, in a Wall Street Journal Op-Ed
Posted April 23, 2010 • 08:26 AM
 
 
On Failing to Make the Case for a Global Warming Tax:
 
 

"Climategate, Copenhagen, Snowmageddon in the nation’s capital, the EPA ruling that CO2 endangers us all, and Senate Republicans pushing for a global-warming tax. Has it been a great run-up to Earth Day, or what?

"Never has a public-policy agenda been pursued with so little regard for scientific fact or for public opinion...

"Yes, it has been quite a year. Climategate. The failure in Copenhagen. The EPA issuing an endangerment finding in which the core scientific fact turns out to have been cooked. The IPCC blow-up. And yet Lindsey Graham and President Obama are dead-set on cramming a new global-warming tax down our throats. How they figure to sell this policy in light of what has happened since November is anyone’s guess. Damn the data; full speed ahead!"

 
 
— Patrick J. Michaels, Author, Cato Institute Environmental Studies Senior Fellow
— Patrick J. Michaels, Author, Cato Institute Environmental Studies Senior Fellow
Posted April 22, 2010 • 08:35 AM
 
 
On Partisanship, Racism and the Tea Party Movement:
 
 

"I attended the Cincinnati Tax Day Tea Party rally as a speaker. But it was more interesting to be an observer.

"First, here's what I didn't see. I didn't see a single racist or bigoted sign or hear a single such comment. Nor did I see any evidence of 'homegrown fascism.' Though in fairness, such things are often in the eye of the beholder, now that dissent has gone from being the highest form of patriotism under George W. Bush to the most common form of racism under Barack Obama...

"Going by what I saw in Cincinnati, second to a profound desire to rein in government, the chief attitude driving the 39 percent of tea partiers who describe themselves as 'very conservative' isn't partisanship, racism or seizing the Sudetenland from Czechoslovakia. It's 'we won't be fooled again.' In the near term, that spells trouble for Obama and Democrats. In the long term, that lays down a serious gauntlet for Republicans."

 
 
— Jonah Goldberg, National Review Online Editor-at-Large
— Jonah Goldberg, National Review Online Editor-at-Large
Posted April 21, 2010 • 08:51 AM
 
 
On the Reasons Behind Congressional Confidence Loss:
 
 

"How did Democrats fall so fast, and take perceptions of government down with them? If the weak economy has hurt, so has what they’ve done and how they’ve done it. Their two signature initiatives -- the stimulus and health care -- constitute massive expansions of government, passed on partisan votes in a sloppy, heedless rush. If Congress doesn’t even know whether it eliminated its own health insurance in Obamacare -- it’s studying the matter closely -- how careful was it with yours?"

 
 
— Rich Lowry, National Review Editor
— Rich Lowry, National Review Editor
Posted April 20, 2010 • 08:37 AM
 
 
On Antigovernment Sentiment and the 2010 Elections:
 
 

"Record discontent with Congress and dim views of elected officials generally have poisoned the well for trust in the federal government. Public opinion about elected officials in Washington is relentlessly negative. Favorable ratings for the Democratic Party have fallen by 21 points -- to 38% from 59% -- over the past year and now stand at their lowest point in Pew Research surveys. The Republican Party's ratings, which increased to 46% in February from 40% last August, have fallen back to 37%.

"Nonetheless, antigovernment sentiment appears to be a more significant driver of possible turnout among Republicans and independents than among Democrats. Perhaps most troubling for Democrats, independent voters who are highly frustrated with government are also highly committed to casting a ballot this year, and they favor the Republican candidates in their districts by an overwhelming 66% to 13% margin."

 
 
— Andrew Kohut, Pew Research Center President
— Andrew Kohut, Pew Research Center President
Posted April 19, 2010 • 08:31 AM
 
 
On the Depth and Strength of the Tea Party Movement:
 
 

"To be sure, great efforts have been made recently to demonize the Tea Party movement. But polling suggests that the Tea Party movement has not been diminished but, in fact, has grown stronger. The Winston Group found, in three national surveys conducted from December through February and published April 1, that the Tea Party movement is composed of a broad cross-section of the American people -- 40 to 50 percent of its supporters are non-Republicans. Indeed, one-third of self-identified Democrats say they support the Tea Party movement.

"The electorate's dissatisfaction with the established political order has led the Tea Party movement to become as potent a force as any U.S. political party.

"Last week, a Rasmussen Reports survey showed that overall more Americans say that they agree with the Tea Party movement on major issues than with the president of the United States -- 48 percent with the Tea Party and 44 percent with Obama. Among independents, 50 percent said that they're closer to the Tea Party, while only 38 percent are with Obama.

"Moreover, the most recent Gallup poll shows that the Tea Party movement is at least as popular as the Democratic Party. And the Tea Party movement stands for fiscal discipline, limited government and balancing the budget -- an agenda that has broad public support extending well beyond the movement. Polling conducted by one of us (Schoen) found that 55 percent of respondents endorse that agenda. More important, a solid majority of swing voters endorse it."

 
 
— Democratic Pollsters Douglas E. Schoen and Patrick H. Caddell, in a Washington Post Editorial
— Democratic Pollsters Douglas E. Schoen and Patrick H. Caddell, in a Washington Post Editorial
Posted April 16, 2010 • 08:15 AM
 
 
On the Number of American Taxpayers Dropping to 50%:
 
 

"Passing the point at which less than half of all tax filers pay income taxes is dangerous because beyond that threshold, approximately a majority of voters could vote themselves an increasing share of government benefits at no cost to themselves. In fact, when the U.S. passes that point, a shrinking minority of tax filers will be financing almost all government spending. In this situation, politicians have even less incentive to restrain government spending because more votes could be won by increasing spending than lost by increasing the tax burden. That is a deadly recipe for never-ending increases in government spending that will inevitably lead to a fiscal implosion when there are no longer enough productive taxpayers to pay the bill for the expanding welfare state."

 
 
— Curtis Dubay, Heritage Foundation Senior Tax Policy Analyst
— Curtis Dubay, Heritage Foundation Senior Tax Policy Analyst
Posted April 15, 2010 • 08:30 AM
 
 
On the Loyal Opposition Party's Path Forward:
 
 

"The Republican party must break with its long-established instinct for caution and make a bold stand for first principles of freedom and constitutional limitations on government — from full repeal of Obamacare to rolling back multitrillion-dollar deficits. This is not so much a reproach of past Republican conduct as it is a recognition of new opportunities."

 
 
— Tony Blankley, Author, Syndicated Columnist and Former Washington Times Editorial Page Editor
— Tony Blankley, Author, Syndicated Columnist and Former Washington Times Editorial Page Editor
Posted April 14, 2010 • 08:39 AM
 
 
On the Continuing Decline in Real Income:
 
 

"Real personal income for Americans - excluding government payouts such as Social Security - has fallen by 3.2 percent since President Obama took office in January 2009, according to the Commerce Department's Bureau of Economic Analysis.

"For comparison, real personal income during the first 15 months in office for President George W. Bush, who inherited a milder recession from his predecessor, dropped 0.4 percent. Income excluding government payouts increased 12.7 percent during Mr. Bush's eight years in office.

"'This is hardly surprising,' said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, an economist and former director of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. 'Under President Obama, only federal spending is going up; jobs, business startups, and incomes are all down. It is proof that the government can't spend its way to prosperity.'"

 
 
— Joseph Curl, The Washington Times
— Joseph Curl, The Washington Times
Posted April 13, 2010 • 08:39 AM
 
 
On Why November 2010 is Looking Bleak for Democrats:
 
 

"Obama, Pelosi, and Reid misread the 2006 and 2008 elections and embarked on an agenda of which the public heartily disapproves. The stimulus failed. Government-centric housing policy has failed. Health care became law despite public resistance. The Obama budget projects massive deficits and debt far into the future. Taxes, regulations, and interest rates are all set to rise. Absent a massive change in policy and tone on the part of Congress and the White House, it's hard to see how the Democrats avoid a very, very bad November. Of course the sluggish economy will play a role. But overall, it's the agenda, stupid."

 
 
— Matthew Continetti, The Weekly Standard Associate Editor
— Matthew Continetti, The Weekly Standard Associate Editor
Posted April 12, 2010 • 08:42 AM
 
Notable Quote   
 
"When California Gov. Gavin Newsom's former chief of staff Dana Williamson pleaded guilty last month to three felonies pertaining to campaign finance fraud and federal tax evasion, the governor told Bloomberg News he was shaken -- but philosophical. The news had come as a shock, he said, before adding that justice must be served.'We've all got to be held to the letter of the law,' Newsom declared.…[more]
 
 
— Susan Crabtree, Political Correspondent for RealClearPolitics
 
Liberty Poll   

Does the current political environment of overt hostility toward any opposite viewpoint make you want to engage more or retreat from personal involvement?