| |
On the President's State of the Union Address: |
|
| |
"Tonight’s speech was about addressing the Democrats’ political problems. They know the American people are fed up with the backroom deals, hyper-partisanship, and one-party rule. So, unsurprisingly, the president took on lobbyists and partisanship. He wants to be seen as both rising above it and not responsible for its consequences. That’s what all of the rhetoric was about: moving the president away from the problems he’s created. Beyond the soaring rhetoric, however, it should be clear: This administration is not budging when it comes to policy. It’s not ready to change tune." |
|
| |
— Congressman Paul Ryan (R-WI), House Budget Committee Ranking Member, Speaking to National Review Online
|
|
|
— Congressman Paul Ryan (R-WI), House Budget Committee Ranking Member, Speaking to National Review Online
|
|
Posted January 28, 2010 • 07:58 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the President's Fiscal Freezes: |
|
| |
"Some conservative Beltway analysts are cheering Obama’s fiscal freeze follies as a step in the right direction, a rhetorical victory and a 'good start.' Pardon me for not joining in the standing ovation for the latest performance of White House kabuki theater. Praising the president for carrying on the charade of budget reform because a few piddling cuts are real is like complimenting the Naked Emperor’s fingernails: So he didn't have any clothes. At least his cuticles were real. It’s a start!" |
|
| |
— Michelle Malkin, Author,Syndicated Columnist
|
|
|
— Michelle Malkin, Author,Syndicated Columnist
|
|
Posted January 27, 2010 • 08:23 AM
|
|
|
| |
On President Obama: |
|
| |
"The president from Oprah Nation, says Newsweek, suffers from an 'inspiration gap'; the prevailing wisdom is that he's too cool and detached for his own political good. Are they kidding? Should the president now take squealing lessons from Howard Dean?
"Mr. Obama's real problems are of a different stripe. It's not as if he lacks for charisma. It's that he believes too much in the power of charisma itself and specifically too much in his own." |
|
| |
— Bret Stephens, The Wall Street Journal
|
|
|
— Bret Stephens, The Wall Street Journal
|
|
Posted January 26, 2010 • 09:32 AM
|
|
|
| |
One Independent Voter's Remorse: |
|
| |
"I am a registered Independent. I voted for Barack Obama. And for that, I am sorry.
"I'm not sorry for you. I'm sorry for me. Because I voted for Obama for me, not for you. I voted for hope and change and all the intangibles that Obama was peddling in the wake of the financial crisis, Sarah Palin, Sept. 11 and all the other ills that shook our country in the last decade. I wanted something new. Something different. What I got was, I suppose, exactly what I voted for - a spin doctor. And not a very good one at that...
"Like many others, my view is narrow. I vote for the candidate I think will be best for me. I often define myself as a fiscal conservative and a social liberal. But above all, I want to feel safe and I don't want to feel that I am being ripped off. I want a president who inspires me and cares about my contribution to the fabric of the country. I want a president with experience and savvy, a Commander in Chief who puts our country and its citizens first.
"I only hope the Republicans can find him the next time around." |
|
| |
— Jill R. Dorson, Freelance Writer and Small Business Owner
|
|
|
— Jill R. Dorson, Freelance Writer and Small Business Owner
|
|
Posted January 25, 2010 • 10:37 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Democrats' "Upset" In Massachusetts: |
|
| |
"Brown ran on a very specific, very clear agenda. Stop health care. Don't Mirandize terrorists. Don't raise taxes; cut them. And no more secret backroom deals with special interests.
"These deals -- the Louisiana purchase, the Cornhusker kickback -- had engendered a national disgust with the corruption and arrogance of one-party rule. The final straw was the union payoff -- in which labor bosses smugly walked out of the White House with a five-year exemption from a ('Cadillac') health insurance tax Democrats were imposing on the 92 percent of private-sector workers who are not unionized." |
|
| |
— Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
|
— Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
Posted January 22, 2010 • 08:37 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Supreme Court's 5-4 Decision Reversing BCRA Limits on Corporate Spending: |
|
| |
"For too long, some in this country have been deprived of full participation in the political process. With today's monumental decision, the Supreme Court took an important step in the direction of restoring the First Amendment rights of these groups by ruling that the Constitution protects their right to express themselves about political candidates and issues up until Election Day. By previously denying this right, the government was picking winners and losers. Our democracy depends upon free speech, not just for some but for all." |
|
| |
— Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
|
|
|
— Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
|
|
Posted January 21, 2010 • 02:18 PM
|
|
|
| |
On Political Pendulums: |
|
| |
"[F]or the past four decades, American politics has consisted of Republicans controlling Washington for eight to 14 years -- either from the White House or Capitol Hill -- thus allowing Americans to forget what it was they didn't like about Democrats, whom they then carelessly vote back in. The Democrats immediately remind Americans what they didn't like about Democrats, and their power is revoked at the voters' first possible opportunity." |
|
| |
— Ann Coulter, Attorney, Legal Correspondent and Syndicated Columnist
|
|
|
— Ann Coulter, Attorney, Legal Correspondent and Syndicated Columnist
|
|
Posted January 21, 2010 • 12:50 PM
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
"You want to see my truck?" |
|
| |
— U.S. Senator-Elect Scott Brown (R-MA)
|
|
|
— U.S. Senator-Elect Scott Brown (R-MA)
|
|
Posted January 20, 2010 • 09:08 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Senate Special Election in Massachusetts: |
|
| |
"Whether or not Republican Scott Brown captures the Senate seat in Massachusetts today, his surging and successful campaign is a fire bell in the night for the Party of Government." |
|
| |
— Pat Buchanan, Syndicated Columnist and Founding Editor, The American Conservative Magazine
|
|
|
— Pat Buchanan, Syndicated Columnist and Founding Editor, The American Conservative Magazine
|
|
Posted January 19, 2010 • 09:21 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Senate Special Election in Massachusetts: |
|
| |
"After all the speeches, politicking, and attack ads, there are just two issues that will determine the winner of the Massachusetts Senate seat in Tuesday's special election. The first is health care and the second is one-party government. And in Massachusetts, neither issue works exactly as outsiders might think -- and right now both are working in favor of Republican Scott Brown." |
|
| |
— Byron York, The (Washington, DC) Examiner Chief Political Correspondent
|
|
|
— Byron York, The (Washington, DC) Examiner Chief Political Correspondent
|
|
Posted January 18, 2010 • 08:41 AM
|
|
|
|