America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains…
So-Called "Railway Safety Act" Constitutes a Political Handout to Big Labor That Does Nothing to Improve Safety At All
America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains a pillar of our economy.
Unfortunately, a destructive proposal before Congress misleadingly named the "Railway Safety Act" (RSA), part of broader surface transportation reauthorization, threatens great harm to our railroads.
Simply put, the bill has nothing to do with improving safety, but has a lot to do with advancing the political agenda of Big Labor. At a moment when inflation burdens American families and fragile supply chains remain vulnerable to disruption, the last thing our economy or rail sector need is another costly federal mandate imposed upon one of the nation’s most important transportation sectors.
As an initial matter, as noted by The Wall Street Journal, the…[more]
Scott Blackburn, Research Director at the Institute for Free Speech, discusses a first-of-its-kind report that grades the freedom of citizens and advocacy groups in each state to speak about candidates, government and issues of public policy, which states performed poorly, and which states earned a respectable score.
Paolo Carozza, Professor of Law at the University of Notre Dame and Co-Chair of the Oversight Board, discusses the independent Oversight Board’s role in providing rulings and recommendations on Meta’s platform postings, who comprises the board, how determinations are made, and the importance of transparency and platform accountability in the online digital space as they relate to free speech.
Bradley A. Smith, Chairman and Founder of the Institute for Free Speech, discusses the Mueller indictments, campaign finance laws, and proposals to respond to foreign interference with broad-based restrictions on American online issue speech.
Dan Epstein, Executive Director of Cause of Action, discusses the oral arguments in Van Hollen v. FEC (a case in which CFIF is an intervenor-party) and why the court should not require non-profits that fund electioneering communications to be forced to release a full list of its supporters.
David Keating, President of the Center for Competitive Politics, discusses O'Keefe v Chisholm, a lawsuit that charges prosecutors in Wisconsin with a multi-year campaign to silence and intimidate conservative groups whose political speech they don't like, the status of campaign finance law five years after the SCOTUS decision in Citizens United, and an important victory for free speech in Nevada.
Scott Blackburn, Research Fellow at the Center for Competitive Politics, discusses the effects of campaign-finance regulations on free political speech and participation, and how not even reformers can follow campaign-finance laws.
Recently, former Mississippi Senator Charlie Ross joined CFIFs Renee Giachino to discuss how Mississippi won the tort war, how its legislation is a model for the nation, and how it is important to institute reforms to conform the law to common sense.