14 July 2023
Hans von Spakovsky, Senior Legal Fellow at The Heritage Foundation, discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decisions striking down President Biden's student loan forgiveness program and ending the use of race in college admissions, and what those decisions may mean for higher education in America.
0:00
0:00
Related Podcasts
06 November 2026
Hans von Spakovsky, Senior Legal Fellow at Advancing American Freedom, discusses some of the major cases on the docket so far for the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2026-2027 term, including a case challenging whether Montgomery County, Maryland’s lottery system for admission to middle school magnet programs effectively discriminates against Asian American students, and what it may mean for schools nationwide.
30 September 2026
William J. Conti, an attorney from Washington, DC, discusses the Protect College Sports Act, a bill recently passed by the U.S. Senate, its prospect of becoming law, what its passage may mean for college sports, and more.
03 June 2026
Michael O’Neill, Senior Vice President and Assistant General Counsel at Landmark Legal Foundation, discusses three upcoming decisions in some of the biggest cases before the U.S. Supreme Court this term and his predictions on how they may be decided.
10 October 2025
Hans von Spakovsky, Manager of the Election Law Reform Initiative and a Senior Legal Fellow in the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation, discusses some of the more significant cases among the 39 already on the U.S. Supreme Court’s current term docket, the volume of emergency appeals before the Court this summer, and why this term is shaping up as one of the most momentous in the Court’s history.
12 July 2024
Ilya Shapiro, Senior Fellow and Director of Constitutional Studies at the Manhattan Institute, discusses some of the seminal cases decided late in the U.S. Supreme Court's term, including the decision that rollbacks the Chevron doctrine and constitutes a massive blow to the power of federal agencies, and how the Court drew the line regarding presidential immunity in another decision.



