|
|
|
06 June 2014
Erin Murphy, partner at Bancroft PLLC, discusses her successful legal argument before the U.S. Supreme Court in McCutcheon v. FEC, in which the Court held the federal aggregate limits on campaign contributions unconstitutional, and her work on Bond v. United States, a case recently decided by the Court involving a poisoned mailbox.
0:00
0:00
Related Podcasts
03 June 2026
Michael O’Neill, Senior Vice President and Assistant General Counsel at Landmark Legal Foundation, discusses three upcoming decisions in some of the biggest cases before the U.S. Supreme Court this term and his predictions on how they may be decided.
06 February 2026
Timothy Lee, Senior Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs at the Center for Individual Freedom, discusses how efforts to target companies that sell entertainment tickets is counterproductive, why the free market should win over legislation that distorts the market, and what the recent U.S. Census tells us about the “science of democracy.”
10 October 2025
Hans von Spakovsky, Manager of the Election Law Reform Initiative and a Senior Legal Fellow in the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation, discusses some of the more significant cases among the 39 already on the U.S. Supreme Court’s current term docket, the volume of emergency appeals before the Court this summer, and why this term is shaping up as one of the most momentous in the Court’s history.
29 January 2021
Timothy Lee, CFIF's Senior Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs, discusses legal precedent surrounding First Amendment protection for freedom of speech, association and petitioning the government, wrongful efforts in Congress to pursue anti-First Amendment legislation regarding mandatory "donor disclosure" laws, and the U.S. Supreme Court's grant of review in two First Amendment donor privacy cases out of California.
30 January 2015
Sally Pipes, President, CEO and Taube Fellow in Health Care Studies at the Pacific Research Institute, discusses the upcoming oral arguments in the latest ObamaCare case before the U.S. Supreme Court and how the new Congress can shed its do-nothing moniker with respect to ObamaCare.
13 June 2014
Paul Kersey, director of labor policy at the Illinois Policy Institute, discusses the Supreme Court case of Harris v. Quinn, which potentially could force countless Medicaid recipients who care for sick or disabled family members to be forced to join the SEIU, and why such a ruling would be wrong and violative of First Amendment freedom of speech and association.
