Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there'…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Inflation: Comparing Trump and Biden...

Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there's one potentially glaring problem for them, as illustrated by our friends at Unleash Prosperity...

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="668"] Biden Versus Trump on Inflation[/caption]

 …[more]

August 17, 2026 • 04:40 PM
Home Jester's Courtroom Swear It Isn’t So
Swear It Isn’t So Print
Thursday, January 08 2009

Hamilton County (Ohio) Judge Robert Ruehlman is fed up with swearing in his courtroom and he is doing something about it. 

On consecutive days, Judge Ruehlman sentenced two individuals to six months in jail for swearing in his courtroom.  Not the swearing in of a party or witness, but rather cuss words from an individual.

First, it was an accused gang member.  Unhappy with having to wait in jail for several more weeks until his trial, accused gang member Jamel Sechrest muttered “That’s (bleeping) bull (bleep).”  “You don’t say bull (bleep) in the courtroom,” Ruehlman told Sechrest before citing him for contempt and sentencing him to six months in jail.

The following day, attorney Michael Brautigam was before the court as his own attorney when he called his opposing counsel “a (bleeping) liar.”  After admitting to the judge what he said under his breath, Brautigam was cited for contempt and sent to jail for six months.  “I had to give him six months because I gave the other guy six months,” Ruehlman said.

“Judge Ruehlman absolutely did the right thing by attempting to maintain order, civility and decorum in his courtroom.  Attorney Brautigam has been discourteous and disrespectful to judges, lawyers and litigants in our community on more than one occasion,” said opposing counsel Peter Koenig.

—Source:  Cincinnati Enquirer

Notable Quote   
 
"There was a time when diesel fuel was usually cheaper than gasoline in the United States. That relationship began to change about 20 years ago, and since then diesel has generally traded at a premium. Today, that premium is not just persistent but unusually large, which raises an obvious question: how did we get from gasoline typically costing more than diesel to diesel costing substantially more…[more]
 
 
— Robert Rapier, Chemical Engineer In the Energy Industry
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you support or oppose President Trump's plan to lower diesel fuel costs by lifting sanctions against Russian exports?