Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there'…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Inflation: Comparing Trump and Biden...

Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there's one potentially glaring problem for them, as illustrated by our friends at Unleash Prosperity...

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="668"] Biden Versus Trump on Inflation[/caption]

 …[more]

August 17, 2026 • 04:40 PM
Home Jester's Courtroom The Evolution of a Frivolous Lawsuit
The Evolution of a Frivolous Lawsuit Print
Thursday, January 14 2016

A $58 million lawsuit filed against an evolutionary biologist over comments he made decades ago in a book review has been thrown out.

The lawsuit against Richard Dawkins was filed by Karl Dahlstrom, author of an anti-evolution book called The Organized Universe. In his lawsuit, Dahlstrom contends that Dawkins was referring to him in a comment made in a 1989 New York Times book review that said, "It is absolutely safe to say that if you meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid or insane (or wicked, but I’d rather not consider that)." 

According to news reports, Dahlstrom was convinced the "somebody" referred to him and that, as such, Dawkins caused millions of persons to be prejudiced and biased against him, injured his reputation and subjected him to hatred, contempt, ridicule and financial injury. All this despite the fact that Dawkins made his statement in 1989, about 24 years before Dahlstrom even published his book. 

Late last year, a magistrate recommended the entire case be thrown out, citing Dahlstrom's "far-fetched rhetoric" and "unsubstantiated conclusions".  More recently, a U.S. District Judge adopted that recommendation, resolving the case for good.

—Source: patheos.com

 

Notable Quote   
 
"There are two ways of looking at the midterms, now less than three weeks away.One is as a simple referendum on the issues and politicians of the day. The other involves a far deeper conflict of visions (as Thomas Sowell puts it): socialism versus capitalism, intrusive versus limited government, and the destruction of time-honored institutions and traditions versus their preservation and renewal.Rarely…[more]
 
 
— Victor Davis Hanson, Distinguished Fellow at the Center for American Greatness and Senior Fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you support or oppose President Trump's plan to lower diesel fuel costs by lifting sanctions against Russian exports?