Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there'…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Inflation: Comparing Trump and Biden...

Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there's one potentially glaring problem for them, as illustrated by our friends at Unleash Prosperity...

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="668"] Biden Versus Trump on Inflation[/caption]

 …[more]

August 17, 2026 • 04:40 PM
Home Jester's Courtroom Golfers Not Liable for Failing to Yell “Fore!”
Golfers Not Liable for Failing to Yell “Fore!” Print
Thursday, May 07 2009

Yelling “Fore!” is etiquette on the golf course following a golfer's errant shot, but the legal system doesn't require it.

In 2002, golfer Anoop Kapoor launched an errant shot out of the rough which ended up hitting his friend, Azad Anand, in the eye, causing Anand to lose sight in that eye.  Anand sued, claiming that Kapoor was liable for failure to yell “fore” before his ball struck his friend.

Although the court expressed its sympathy to Anand, it recently ruled 3-1 in favor of Kapoor, saying Ananad is not entitled to damages and that being hit by an errant ball is an "inherent risk of the game of golf."  The court based its decision, in part, on the fact that Anand's shot was so far off course that a warning would not have been anticipated.

"While we are sympathetic to the fact that plaintiff was seriously injured as a result of this accident," the panel observed, "to conclude that the defendant can be held 'liable' in tort for a poorly-executed golf shot because he may have negligently failed to shout 'fore' is inimical to the rationale underlying the doctrine of primary assumption of the risk, and at odds with the public policy goal for its adoption -- to encourage 'free and vigorous participation' in sports and recreational activities."

—Sources:  New York Law Journal and The Wall Street Journal

Notable Quote   
 
"There was a time when diesel fuel was usually cheaper than gasoline in the United States. That relationship began to change about 20 years ago, and since then diesel has generally traded at a premium. Today, that premium is not just persistent but unusually large, which raises an obvious question: how did we get from gasoline typically costing more than diesel to diesel costing substantially more…[more]
 
 
— Robert Rapier, Chemical Engineer In the Energy Industry
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you support or oppose President Trump's plan to lower diesel fuel costs by lifting sanctions against Russian exports?