As we at CFIF often highlight, strong intellectual property (IP) rights - including patent rights -…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Senate Must Support Strong Patent Rights, Not Erode Them

As we at CFIF often highlight, strong intellectual property (IP) rights - including patent rights - constitute a core element of "American Exceptionalism" and explain how we became the most inventive, prosperous, technologically advanced nation in human history.  Our Founding Fathers considered IP so important that they explicitly protected it in the text of Article I of the United States Constitution.

Strong patent rights also explain how the U.S. accounts for an incredible two-thirds of all new lifesaving drugs introduced worldwide.

Elected officials must therefore work to protect strong IP and patent rights, not undermine them.   Unfortunately, several anti-patent bills currently before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee this week threaten to do exactly…[more]

April 02, 2025 • 08:29 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Press Releases
CFIF Strongly Supports the RESTORE Patent Rights Act of 2025 Print E-mail
Tuesday, February 25 2025

WASHINGTON, DC – Today, the Realizing Engineering, Science, and Technology Opportunities by Restoring Exclusive (RESTORE) Patent Rights Act, sponsored by Senators Tom Cotton (R-AR) and Chris Coons (D-DE) and Representatives Nathaniel Moran (R-TX) and Madeleine Dean (D-PA), was reintroduced in Congress. The bipartisan legislation would restore basic protections for America’s innovators by ensuring that injunctive relief is available from U.S. courts against known patent infringers.

In response, Center for Individual Freedom (“CFIF”) President Jeffrey Mazzella released the following statement expressing CFIF’s strong support for swift passage of the PROTECT Patent Rights Act:

"For more than two centuries, a guiding principle of U.S. patent law was the logical idea that parties found to be infringing on others’ patents without permission should be forced to stop the infringing activity. But that changed with the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in eBay v. MercExchange. That decision and its misapplication by lower U.S. courts effectively eliminated the ability of patent holders to secure injunctive relief against known infringers.

"As a result, America’s innovators and inventors have been left with little ability to effectively protect their intellectual property rights. Even worse, the practice of 'predatory infringement' – when it is cheaper to steal a patent than pay reasonable licensing fees for use of the patent – has increased. 

“Restoring the presumption of injunctive relief is vital to restoring fairness and commonsense to our nation’s patent system. CFIF strongly supports the PROTECT Patent Rights Act of 2025 and urges its swift passage.”

The Center for Individual Freedom is a constitutional and free-market advocacy organization with more than 300,000 activists and supporters nationwide.

###

 


Page 4 of 282
Notable Quote   
 
"Will this law review article 'promote DEI values'? Does it cite scholars from 'underrepresented groups'? Will it have 'any foreseeable impact in enhancing diversity, equity, and inclusion'? And why did one team of editors solicit 'only white, male authors'?Those are some of the questions that editors at the Harvard Law Review asked in internal documents obtained by the Washington Free Beacon. The…[more]
 
 
— Aaron Sibarium, Washington Free Beacon
 
Liberty Poll   

Should any "peace" agreement with Iran specifically and unconditionally force the country to halt all nuclear development?