Last week, I wrote in my column that “So far, consensus around the FAA’s thinking indicates that…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Some Domestic Drones May Get Rubber Bullets, Tear Gas

Last week, I wrote in my column that “So far, consensus around the FAA’s thinking indicates that domestic drones would not be approved to fly with weapons.”

That was in reference to the Federal Aviation Administration’s announcement that it will ease restrictions on civilian use of unmanned drones for use in surveillance and research.  The institutions most interested in using drones are law enforcement entities ranging from the FBI to local police departments.

Now, consider this:

Chief Deputy Randy McDaniel of the Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office in Texas told The Daily that his department is considering using rubber bullets and tear gas on its drone.

“Those are things that law enforcement utilizes day in and day out and in certain situations it might be advantageous…[more]

May 23, 2012 • 03:32 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Obama’s Hopes for An Economic Recovery by Election Day Are Doomed Print
By Troy Senik
Thursday, June 02 2011
Because Obama is so acclimated to spending other people’s money, he doesn’t realize that those who spend their own – and who stand the chance of losing it – make investment decisions on the basis of tangible realities, not the projections of professional economists whose predictive accuracy is on par with Harold Camping’s end times pronouncement.

Talk to stalwart Barack Obama supporters (there are still some of them out there) and many of them will tell you that the key to the 44th President’s reelection is the state of the American economy. 
 
The president, they reason, is still personally popular, able to trade on a likable personality and an innate charisma that recommends him to that subset of the American population whose loyalty can be won with such vaporous traits.
 
Nor is he especially vulnerable on foreign policy. The war in Iraq has essentially been a non-issue throughout his tenure. The conflict in Libya, though widely recognized as rudderless and amorphous in practice, commands only fleeting public attention and remains middling in its domestic impact.
 
Afghanistan, certainly the most salient of our armed endeavors abroad, is a source of increasing national disquiet, but that sentiment seems to be shared in the Oval Office. Obama, after all, is the president who announced his troop surge into that nation by discussing the withdrawal of those selfsame troops in the next breath. As a result, that surge seemed little more than the cost of his ransomed dovishness. Whatever qualms remain about his executive resolve, his supporters reason, will be obviated by his unqualified success in hunting down and killing Osama Bin Laden.
 
Given those preconditions and the introspective tact that the nation has taken in the wake of the economic downturn, the argument for reelection thus rests firmly on the prospects for renewed growth. Yet this is comfort served cold. With consistently high unemployment still hovering around 9 percent (and that’s without factoring in those who have dropped out of the labor force, which brings the number closer to 16 percent), surging food and fuel prices and a still-depressed housing market, the hill Obama has to climb is steep. 

His policies ensure that he’ll never reach the top.
 
To the extent that government can manipulate the job market, it does so through the incentives put in place by public policy. The passage of ObamaCare – and the uncertainty of knowing how it will be implemented – keeps employers in the dark about what the true cost of hiring new employees will be, leaving them disinclined to expand the work force. The uncertainty about where tax rates will end up has a similarly paralytic effect. And a host of other regulatory impositions – be they environmental crusades or sops to big labor – freeze business in their tracks.
 
For Obama, who exists in a paranormal universe where benefits are unmoored from costs, this is unintelligible. In a February speech to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, he harangued American business for sitting on nearly $2 trillion in capital, saying “many of your own economists and salespeople are now forecasting a healthy increase in demand. So I just want to encourage you to get in the game.”
 
Call it the soft soviet line of persuasion. Because Obama is so acclimated to spending other people’s money, he doesn’t realize that those who spend their own – and who stand the chance of losing it – make investment decisions on the basis of tangible realities, not the projections of professional economists whose predictive accuracy is on par with Harold Camping’s end times pronouncement.
 
While unemployment may be the dominant economic concern of the Obama Administration, it has no answers anywhere else either.
 
As gas prices go through the roof, the president has made no serious effort to expand domestic oil production, falling back on bromides about green technology that has repeatedly been shown to be expensive and ineffective in equal measure.
 
As the inflation that inevitably follows the Federal Reserve’s injection of trillions of dollars into the marketplace takes hold, the president remains silent, knowing that it’s a de facto tax on the American people and a gimmick to avoid addressing the national debt.
 
And as our entitlement programs careen out of control, Obama can do nothing but criticize the Republicans who have been bold enough to offer reform plans – despite the fact that the status quo is the most dangerous option available to us.
 
Barack Obama’s supporters say the key to the 2012 election will be the economy. His opponents can only hope as much.

Question of the Week   
How many steps in each direction are marched by the sentinels while guarding The Tomb of the Unknowns at Arlington National Cemetery?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Trying to figure out Valerie Jarrett’s mysterious hold on Barack and Michelle Obama is a favorite guessing game in the parlors and dining rooms of Washington. No other White House official in history has enjoyed such a unique relationship with both a president and a first lady, and yet the mainstream media have ignored Jarrett’s enormous influence over the shape and direction of the Obama…[more]
 
 
—Edward Klein, Author, Vanity Fair Contributing Editor, Former Newsweek Foreign Editor and Former New York Times Magazine Editor in Chief
— Edward Klein, Author, Vanity Fair Contributing Editor, Former Newsweek Foreign Editor and Former New York Times Magazine Editor in Chief
 
Liberty Poll   

Should the Obama administration authorize the use of aerial drones by local police agencies?