America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
So-Called "Railway Safety Act" Constitutes a Political Handout to Big Labor That Does Nothing to Improve Safety At All

America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains a pillar of our economy.

Unfortunately, a destructive proposal before Congress misleadingly named the "Railway Safety Act" (RSA), part of broader surface transportation reauthorization, threatens great harm to our railroads.

Simply put, the bill has nothing to do with improving safety, but has a lot to do with advancing the political agenda of Big Labor.  At a moment when inflation burdens American families and fragile supply chains remain vulnerable to disruption, the last thing our economy or rail sector need is another costly federal mandate imposed upon one of the nation’s most important transportation sectors.

As an initial matter, as noted by The Wall Street Journal, the…[more]

May 20, 2026 • 04:28 PM
Notable Quotes
 
On Learning to Question ObamaCare:
 
 

"The German writer Goethe once said, 'With knowledge comes more doubt.'  

"That’s certainly the way Americans are reacting to the approach of ObamaCare. ... More Americans want the law repealed than want to keep it. ...  

"It wasn’t supposed to work this way. The idea was Congress would pass the bill; we’d then learn what was in it — and react more favorably as ObamaCare kicked in. But barely two months before the Oct. 1 roll-out, it appears the more Americans learn, the more worried they become. With good reason."

 
 
— The Editors, The New York Post
— The Editors, The New York Post
Posted July 29, 2013 • 08:03 AM
 
 
On Anthony Weiner and Eliot Spitzer's NYC Election Campaigns:
 
 

"When Anthony Weiner and Eliot Spitzer announced they were running for two of this city’s most important positions — mayor and comptroller — they confirmed themselves to be men beyond embarrassment. Unfortunately, their presence in these races is making New York the punchline of a national dirty joke. We call on these men to end their campaigns. ...   

"We’d like to think that these men would simply spare the New York they claim to love the indignity of their campaigns and withdraw. The available evidence, alas, suggests that if they had that regard they never would have entered. So if they are going to go, they will likely need to be pushed."

 
 
— The Editors, The New York Post
— The Editors, The New York Post
Posted July 26, 2013 • 08:00 AM
 
 
On Presidential Second Term Scandals:
 
 

"Second term scandals may intensify in part because presidents invariably dismiss them as unimportant, just as Obama yesterday referred to his troubles as 'phony.' But he likely won't be any more convincing with that line than Nixon was in calling Watergate 'a second-rate burglary.' Similarly, Obama's exasperated 'I am here to say this needs to stop' recalled Clinton's finger-wagging order, 'I want you to listen to me ... I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky ...'

"But a presidential dalliance with an intern is a far cry from using the IRS to silence political opponents or covering up incompetence that killed four brave Americans in Libya, nor is there anything phony about the potential consequences for Obama."

 
 
— The Editors, The Washington (DC) Examiner
— The Editors, The Washington (DC) Examiner
Posted July 25, 2013 • 08:38 AM
 
 
On the IRS Singling Out Conservative Groups for Special Treatment:
 
 

"Have you noticed that the Internal Revenue Service scandal seems to be getting ever closer to the White House? The IRS originally tried to set up 'rogue employees in Cincinnati' as fall guys. But in congressional testimony, they revealed that the targeting of dissenting groups was directed from Washington. ... 

"As this column has argued before, the higher this scandal goes, the better it is for the country. We say that not because we don't care for Barack Obama -- let's be honest, a President Biden would be no bargain either -- but because the president can be held accountable if it turns out he or his top aides essentially instructed the IRS to steal the 2012 election. A corrupt administration can be dealt with, as Richard Nixon's was 40 years ago. 

"By contrast, if career IRS employees acted on their own, it means the integrity of American democracy itself is threatened by an out-of-control administrative state. In that case, how to solve the problem is not at all clear."

 
 
— James Taranto, The Wall Street Journal
— James Taranto, The Wall Street Journal
Posted July 24, 2013 • 07:46 AM
 
 
On the President's Announced Refocus on the Economy:
 
 

"Amid a lot of buildup and raised expectations, the White House has announced that it is going to return to returning to the economy. That’s right: This week President Obama is going to make a series of high-profile speeches promoting his economic policy du jour in Illinois, Missouri and Florida. It’ll be interesting to see if any of these speeches highlights the glaring deficiencies of his previous plans for the economy. I don’t expect the White House to admit failure, but hopefully even it realizes that more of the same is undesirable. We’ve tried Obama’s stimulus. We’ve watched as this president has raised taxes, heaped regulations on businesses, been a friend of trial lawyers, declared war on coal and discouraged oil drilling whenever he thought he wouldn’t get caught. And the cascading calamity of Obamacare has united private employers and labor unions in their near-panic to avoid the crippling realities of the job-killing, so-called health care plan."

 
 
— Ed Rogers, BGR Group Chairman and Washington Post Contributor
— Ed Rogers, BGR Group Chairman and Washington Post Contributor
Posted July 23, 2013 • 08:48 AM
 
 
On ObamaCare's Data Collection Nightmare:
 
 

"The Department of Health and Human Services is about to hire an army of 'patient navigators' to inform Americans about the subsidized insurance promised by Obamacare and assist them in enrolling. These organizers will be guided by the new Federal Data Hub, which will give them access to reams of personal information compiled by federal agencies ranging from the IRS to the Department of Defense and the Veterans Administration. ... 

"This spring, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee lawyers were also told by HHS that, despite the fact that navigators will have access to sensitive data such as Social Security numbers and tax returns, there will be no criminal background checks required for them. Indeed, they won’t even have to have high-school diplomas. Both U.S. Census Bureau and IRS employees must meet those minimum standards, if only because no one wants someone who has been convicted of identity theft getting near Americans’ personal records. ... 

"'Giving community organizers access to the Federal Data Hub is bad policy and potentially a danger to civil liberties,' House Budget Committee chairman Paul Ryan told me recently. 'But it’s one of the most underreported stories I’ve seen. If people only knew about this Data Hub program, it would touch off a huge public outcry.'"

 
 
— John Fund, National Review Online National-Affairs Columnist
— John Fund, National Review Online National-Affairs Columnist
Posted July 22, 2013 • 08:10 AM
 
 
On Fissures in Democrats' Support for ObamaCare:
 
 

"President Obama touted Obamacare’s supposed benefits Thursday in the hope of distracting attention from Wednesday’s bipartisan House vote that for the first time revealed fissures in congressional Democrats’ lockstep support for his health care law. An unprecedented 35 Democrats bucked the president by voting to delay Obamacare’s 'employer mandate,' while 22 Democrats voted to delay its 'individual mandate' for one year. Obamacare opponents now have an opportunity to widen the fissures among its supporters. ... 

"[...] While most House Democrats voted to preserve the individual mandate — which may haunt them in their next election — one in six voted against President Obama on the employer mandate, while one in nine voted against him on the individual mandate. These votes exposed the first fissure in more than three years of lockstep support for Obamacare among congressional Democrats, and are the latest sign that support for the law is fracturing. ... 

"Every implementation glitch that emerges between now and 2014, every complaint ObamaCare supporters hear from unions and other Democratic constituencies will soften congressional opposition to reopening ObamaCare. If the same one-in-nine share of Senate Democrats buck the president on the individual mandate, there would be more than enough Senate votes — 52 — to delay or repeal the individual mandate through the budget-reconciliation process."

 
 
— Michael F. Cannon, Cato Institute Director of Health Policy Studies
— Michael F. Cannon, Cato Institute Director of Health Policy Studies
Posted July 19, 2013 • 08:23 AM
 
 
On High-Ranking IRS Lawyers Targeting Conservative Groups:
 
 

"The congressional investigation into the Internal Revenue Service’s targeting of tea-party groups inched closer to the White House yesterday as testimony from three IRS attorneys indicated lawyers in the agency’s chief counsel’s office were involved in reviewing the applications of tea-party groups for tax exemption. The office is led by William Wilkins, one of two IRS officials appointed by President Obama. 

"A source tells National Review Online that Judith Kindell, a senior adviser to Lois Lerner, also held up the processing of tea-party cases by demanding to review them herself. ... 

"Wilkins, who, according to the IRS, heads an office of 1,600 attorneys, has been involved in Democratic politics for over three decades."

 
 
— Eliana Johnson, National Review Online Media Editor
— Eliana Johnson, National Review Online Media Editor
Posted July 18, 2013 • 08:16 AM
 
 
On Eric Holder's Attack on Self-Defense Laws:
 
 

"Welcome to the Obama administration's cringe-inducing non sequitur of the week. On Tuesday, Attorney General Eric Holder continued stoking the fires of racial resentment over a Florida jury's acquittal of George Zimmerman. In an address to NAACP leaders, who are demanding federal intervention, Holder attacked Stand Your Ground self-defense laws. ... 

"The Obama administration's cynical campaign against Stand Your Ground laws is a racially charged weapon of mass distraction. The goal isn't public safety or community harmony. The goal is for conservative political opponents to Surrender Your Ground. Silence, as always, is complicity. Political self-defense, as with physical self-defense, begins with self-assertion."

 
 
— Michelle Malkin, Syndicated Columnist
— Michelle Malkin, Syndicated Columnist
Posted July 17, 2013 • 08:03 AM
 
 
On Government Scrutiny of Candidate and Donor Tax Records:
 
 

"The Treasury Department has admitted for the first time that confidential tax records of several political candidates and campaign donors were improperly scrutinized by government officials, but the Justice Department has declined to prosecute any of the cases. 

"Its investigators also are probing two allegations that the Internal Revenue Service 'targeted for audit candidates for public office,' the Treasury’s inspector general for tax administration, J. Russell George, has privately told Sen. Chuck Grassley. ... 

"Mr. Grassley has asked Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. to explain why the Justice Department chose not to prosecute any of the cases. The Iowa Republican told The Washington Times that the IRS 'is required to act with neutrality and professionalism, not political bias.'"

 
 
— Dave Boyer and Ben Wolfgang, The Washington Times
— Dave Boyer and Ben Wolfgang, The Washington Times
Posted July 16, 2013 • 07:58 AM
 
Notable Quote   
 
"For the last two months, President Trump's rhetoric on Iran has seesawed between expressing optimism on negotiations and making explicit threats to remove the mullahs from power.This week, Trump has returned to pugilistic mode, boasting of the strikes that quickly followed a regime drone attack on a US Apache helicopter -- and warning, 'We're going to hit them hard again.'Yet as long as Trump sees…[more]
 
 
— Mark Dubowitz and Miad Maleki, Foundation for Defense of Democracies
 
Liberty Poll   

Does the current political environment of overt hostility toward any opposite viewpoint make you want to engage more or retreat from personal involvement?