Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there'…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Inflation: Comparing Trump and Biden...

Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there's one potentially glaring problem for them, as illustrated by our friends at Unleash Prosperity...

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="668"] Biden Versus Trump on Inflation[/caption]

 …[more]

August 17, 2026 • 04:40 PM
Notable Quotes
 
On Immigration Reform's "Comprehensive Southern Border Security":
 
 

"The Gang of Eight bill being debated in the Senate does not require any security advances before illegal immigrants are granted a decade-long 'temporary' legal status. And all that is required before those same immigrants move on to permanent legal status and citizenship is that a 'Comprehensive Southern Border Security Strategy' be 'substantially deployed and substantially operational.' 

"What does 'substantially' mean? It could mean anything, which is why lawmakers who don't want to place specific security requirements before permanent legalization like it. ... 

"Both Democrats and Republicans have been happy to let the public think the bill is tougher than it is. For example, Sen. Marco Rubio, the leading Republican on the Gang of Eight, talks all the time about the importance of putting new security measures in place, but he means before immigrants are given permanent status, not before the temporary, decade-long legalization that starts the process."

 
 
— Byron York, The Washington Examiner Chief Political Correspondent
— Byron York, The Washington Examiner Chief Political Correspondent
Posted June 19, 2013 • 07:36 AM
 
 
On Congressional Immigration Reform and Border Defense Pretense:
 
 

"Congress is boring. It can’t even make new false promises. 

"On border security, it keeps making the same assurances. The Gang of Eight immigration bill, which could well be the signature legislative accomplishment of President Barack Obama’s second term, travels in the well-worn ruts of past immigration promises. The Gang of Eight is offering this basic deal: 'We will pretend to enforce the law, if you pretend to believe us.' ... 

"The Gang of Eight bill is powered, in large part, by pretense and word games. If this bill passes, and then a decade or so from now we need another amnesty, the road map to passage will be easy: Congress can promise to follow up on the Gang of Eight’s enforcement measures — yet again."

 
 
— Rich Lowry, National Review Editor, In the New York Post
— Rich Lowry, National Review Editor, In the New York Post
Posted June 18, 2013 • 08:04 AM
 
 
On Iran's Newly-Elected President Rouhani:
 
 

"The Obama administration and European leaders, so predictably, are swooning over Iran’s newly elected 'pragmatic moderate' president Hassan Rouhani, who is actually a Khomeini disciple and supporter of the current, despicable Khameini regime — and who (a) would not have been permitted to run without the regime’s blessing, (b) enthusiastically supports Iran’s nuclear program, (c) called for the execution of 'green revolution' activists in 2009, and (d) ardently backs the Assad regime in Syria because it, like Rouhani himself, is an implacable enemy of Israel."

 
 
— Andrew C. McCarthy, Legal Commentator, Terrorism Expert and Former Federal Prosecutor
— Andrew C. McCarthy, Legal Commentator, Terrorism Expert and Former Federal Prosecutor
Posted June 17, 2013 • 07:51 AM
 
 
On Accountability and Responsibility in the Obama Administration:
 
 

"The Obama administration's handling of its multiple scandals paints a picture of those who believe they are above the law. There's a pattern of arrogance, dismissiveness, denial, scapegoating, stonewalling, lying, false professions of ignorance, assurances of accountability and punishing whistle-blowers. ... 

"Congress must not be deterred by the administration's evasions. It must turn up the heat and be just as persistent in demanding accountability as the administration is in dodging it."

 
 
— David Limbaugh, Syndicated Columnist
— David Limbaugh, Syndicated Columnist
Posted June 14, 2013 • 07:20 AM
 
 
On Bureaucratic Bullies and Government Trust:
 
 

"The case against the NSA is: Lois Lerner and others of her ilk. 

"Government requires trust. Government by progressives, however, demands such inordinate amounts of trust that the demand itself should provoke distrust. Progressivism can be distilled into two words: 'Trust us.' The antecedent of the pronoun is: The wise, disinterested experts through whom the vast powers of the regulatory state’s executive branch will deliver progress for our own good, as the executive branch understands this, whether we understand it or not. Lois Lerner is the scowling face of this state, which has earned Americans’ distrust."

 
 
— George F. Will, Nationally Syndicated Columnist
— George F. Will, Nationally Syndicated Columnist
Posted June 13, 2013 • 08:11 AM
 
 
On the Gang of Eight's Immigration Bill:
 
 

"Suicidal Republicans have supported illegal alien amnesties dating back to the Reagan era. They have paid a steep, lasting price. ... The progs' plan has always been to exploit the massive population of illegal aliens to redraw the political map and secure a permanent ruling majority. 

"Now, in the wake of nonstop D.C. corruption eruptions, SchMcGRubio and Company want us to trust them with a thousand new pages of phony triggers, left-wing slush-fund spending and make-believe assimilation gestures. Trust them? Hell, no. There's only one course for citizens who believe in upholding the Constitution and protecting the American dream: Stop them."

 
 
— Michelle Malkin, Syndicated Columnist
— Michelle Malkin, Syndicated Columnist
Posted June 12, 2013 • 07:55 AM
 
 
On Striking a Balance Between Security and Freedom:
 
 

"Obama asks us to trust that he's using power judiciously. Under President Bush, liberals were never given reason to fear that government power was being used to persecute them. Enough said. 

"The president assures us that 'no one is listening to our phone calls,' and that may be true. But this administration also assured us that no sweeping data collection on American citizens was going on, that the IRS was not unfairly singling out conservatives, that the Justice Department had not attempted to prosecute journalists, and that the Benghazi attack was the response to a video. 

"It would be nice to trust the president, but it wouldn't be wise."

 
 
— Mona Charen, Nationally Syndicated Columnist
— Mona Charen, Nationally Syndicated Columnist
Posted June 11, 2013 • 07:42 AM
 
 
On the Senate's Immigration Reform Package:
 
 

"The most sweeping overhaul of the nation's immigration system in nearly three decades finally arrives on the Senate floor this week. 

"Leaders in the upper chamber are aiming for passage by July 4 of a measure that would open up a road to citizenship for millions of undocumented immigrants living in the United States. A bipartisan group of four Democrats and four Republicans spent several months crafting the bill, and the Senate Judiciary Committee put the finishing touches on it last month.  

"But with zero hour at hand, the fate of reform legislation is uncertain."

 
 
— Caitlin Huey-Burns, RealClearPolitics
— Caitlin Huey-Burns, RealClearPolitics
Posted June 10, 2013 • 08:41 AM
 
 
On the Administration's Phone Records Seizures:
 
 

"How ironic that the Obama phone-record grab should be revealed 64 years to the day after publication of Orwell's '1984.' As it happens, it also comes 225 years to the day after James Madison warned the Virginia Ratifying Convention that 'there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power, than by violent and sudden usurpations.'

"The great Founding Father was arguing for adoption of his Constitution of limited government.

"It is questionable, however, whether he would recognize where exactly the limits are anymore."

 
 
— The Editors, Investor's Business Daily
— The Editors, Investor's Business Daily
Posted June 07, 2013 • 07:39 AM
 
 
On the Appointment of Susan Rice as National Security Advisor:
 
 

"There are three big losers from President Obama’s cynical appointment of Susan Rice as his new national security adviser: Secretary of State John Kerry, Congress and the American people. ... 

"Rice has the weakest credentials of any national security adviser in the history of the office, but she has the president’s ear as his old pal. And she’ll work in the White House: Proximity to POTUS is trumps in DC. Kerry’s desk in Foggy Bottom might as well be a hundred miles from the Oval Office. 

"However incompetent, Rice may become the most influential national security adviser since Henry Kissinger eclipsed the entire State Department. Which means that Obama’s foreign policy, already disastrous, is now going to get worse."

 
 
— Ralph Peters, New York Post
— Ralph Peters, New York Post
Posted June 06, 2013 • 07:54 AM
 
Notable Quote   
 
"The U.S. Supreme Court will kick off its 2026 term next week with what will be one of its biggest cases of the year. And according to several legal specialists, there's much more to the dispute than meets the eye.The case in question is Suncor v. Boulder, which deals with the lawfare that Boulder, Colorado, launched against Suncor Energy companies and the Exxon Mobil Corporation. The city is seeking…[more]
 
 
— Shawn Fleetwood, Teh Federalist
 
Liberty Poll   

Based on the meteoric development of AI, do you believe that your job is going to be threatened or enhanced?