| |
On Administration Involvement in the Benghazi Talking Points: |
|
| |
"The White House on Wednesday released 94 pages of emails between top administration and intelligence officials who helped shape the talking points about the attacks in Benghazi, Libya, that the CIA would provide to policymakers in both the legislative and executive branches.
"The documents, first reported by THE WEEKLY STANDARD ... directly contradict claims by White House press secretary Jay Carney and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that the revisions of those talking points were driven by the intelligence community and show heavy input from top Obama administration officials, particularly those at the State Department." |
|
| |
— Stephen F. Hayes, The Weekly Standard
|
|
|
— Stephen F. Hayes, The Weekly Standard
|
|
Posted May 16, 2013 • 08:00 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the IRS's Widening Net of Conservative Targets: |
|
| |
"The IRS came after Billy Graham, too, his son charged Tuesday in a letter to President Barack Obama.
"Franklin Graham, the president of the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association and the family’s international humanitarian organization Samaritan’s Purse, said that the IRS notified the organizations in September that it was conducting a 'review' of their activities for tax year 2010.
"With the IRS admitting it gave extra scrutiny to conservative political organizations, Graham says he now believes that the review was part of an Obama administration effort of 'targeting and attempting to intimidate us.'" |
|
| |
|
|
Posted May 15, 2013 • 07:52 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Obama Administration and Political Targeting By the IRS: |
|
| |
"Jay Carney, whose unenviable job is not to explain but to explain away what his employers say, calls the IRS’s behavior 'inappropriate.' No, using the salad fork for the entree is inappropriate. Using the Internal Revenue Service for political purposes is a criminal offense.
"It remains to be discovered whether the chief executive is guilty of more than an amazingly convenient failure to superintend the excesses of some executive-branch employees beyond the Allegheny Mountains. Meanwhile, file this under 'What a tangled web we weave'...
"If Republicans had controlled both houses of Congress in 1973, Nixon would have completed his term. If Democrats controlled both today, the Obama administration’s lawlessness would go uninvestigated. Not even divided government is safe government, but it beats the alternative." |
|
| |
— George F. Will, Nationally Syndicated Columnist
|
|
|
— George F. Will, Nationally Syndicated Columnist
|
|
Posted May 14, 2013 • 08:00 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the IRS Targeting Conservative Non-Profit Organizations: |
|
| |
"The organizations that were improperly targeted were subject to inquisitorial questioning in violation of IRS policies and practices. The IRS improperly demanded that conservative groups disclose lists of donors — 501(c)(4) donors can remain anonymous under the law — as well as political literature, contacts with political figures and activists, even activities of friends and family members not related to the organizations in question. Jewish groups were quizzed about their theological beliefs and their opinions on Israel.
"There are at least three separate categories of wrongdoing here. The first is the targeting of groups that were believed to be critical of the Obama administration or the federal government in general. The second is the demanding of information that was irrelevant to the tax-status questions at hand, which would have been wrong even if the practice had been applied evenhandedly across the political spectrum. The third is the misleading of Congress and the public about these practices." |
|
| |
— The Editors, National Review Online
|
|
|
— The Editors, National Review Online
|
|
Posted May 13, 2013 • 08:11 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Administration Revisions to the Benghazi Talking Points: |
|
| |
"When it became clear last fall that the CIA’s now discredited Benghazi talking points were flawed, the White House said repeatedly the documents were put together almost entirely by the intelligence community, but White House documents reviewed by Congress suggest a different story. ...
"White House emails reviewed by ABC News suggest the edits were made with extensive input from the State Department. The edits included requests from the State Department that references to the Al Qaeda-affiliated group Ansar al-Sharia be deleted as well references to CIA warnings about terrorist threats in Benghazi in the months preceding the attack.
"That would appear to directly contradict what White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said about the talking points in November." |
|
| |
— Jonathan Karl, ABC News Chief White House Correspondent
|
|
|
— Jonathan Karl, ABC News Chief White House Correspondent
|
|
Posted May 10, 2013 • 07:28 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Administration's Handling of the Benghazi Terror Attacks: |
|
| |
"Benghazi is not going away.
"On Wednesday, U.S. diplomat Gregory Hicks came to Congress with headline-worthy testimony. ...
"Hicks raises big questions – serious ones about what the Obama administration (especially Hillary Clinton) knew and did in response. ...
"Benghazi has already cost the president his first choice for secretary of State. What could stonewalling cost the White House this time?" |
|
| |
— Kristin Roberts, National Journal News Editor
|
|
|
— Kristin Roberts, National Journal News Editor
|
|
Posted May 09, 2013 • 07:43 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Obama Administration's Discrediting of the Benghazi Whistleblowers: |
|
| |
"It’s on. As the White House grapples with a growing backlash over its Libya lies and lapses, President Obama’s apologists are gearing up for battle. Put on your hip waders. Grab those tar buckets. Get ready for Operation Smear Benghazi Whistleblowers. ...
"If you thought Chicago-on-the-Potomac was dirty, you ain’t seen nothing yet. No stone will be left unturned in the effort to slime, sully, and squelch the Benghazi truth tellers. Mark my words: This is how Obama’s thugs roll." |
|
| |
— Michelle Malkin, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
|
— Michelle Malkin, Syndicated Columnist
|
|
Posted May 08, 2013 • 08:00 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Financial Cost of Granting Amnesty to Illegal Immigrants: |
|
| |
"An exhaustive study by the Heritage Foundation has found that after amnesty, current unlawful immigrants would receive $9.4 trillion in government benefits and services and pay more than $3 trillion in taxes over their lifetimes. That leaves a net fiscal deficit (benefits minus taxes) of $6.3 trillion. That deficit would have to be financed by increasing the government debt or raising taxes on U.S. citizens.
"For centuries immigration has been vital to our nation’s health, and it will be essential to our future success. Yet immigrants should come to our nation lawfully and should not impose additional fiscal costs on our overburdened taxpayers. An efficient and merit-based system would help our economy and lessen the burden on taxpayers, strengthening our nation. ...
"In addition to costing taxpayers, amnesty is unfair to those who came to this country lawfully. More than 4 million people are waiting to come to the United States lawfully, but our dysfunctional bureaucracy makes it easier to break the law than to follow it." |
|
| |
— Jim DeMint and Robert Rector, The Heritage Foundation
|
|
|
— Jim DeMint and Robert Rector, The Heritage Foundation
|
|
Posted May 07, 2013 • 07:59 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the State Department's Response to the Terror Attacks in Benghazi: |
|
| |
"On the night of Sept. 11, as the Obama administration scrambled to respond to the Benghazi terror attacks, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and a key aide effectively tried to cut the department's own counterterrorism bureau out of the chain of reporting and decision-making, according to a 'whistle-blower' witness from that bureau who will soon testify to the charge before Congress, Fox News has learned.
"That witness is Mark I. Thompson, a former Marine and now the deputy coordinator for operations in the agency’s counterterrorism bureau. Sources tell Fox News Thompson will level the allegation against Clinton during testimony on Wednesday before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, chaired by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif." |
|
| |
— James Rosen, Fox News Channel Chief Washington Correspondent
|
|
|
— James Rosen, Fox News Channel Chief Washington Correspondent
|
|
Posted May 06, 2013 • 07:45 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Getting Answers on Benghazi: |
|
| |
"Next week, the House Oversight Committee, chaired by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), will open new hearings on Benghazi — and they could be explosive. He promises to expose new information the administration 'has tried to suppress.' ...
"The administration plainly wishes the whole subject would go away. The attack happened 'a long time ago,' President Obama’s spokesman, Jay Carney, said this week, complaining about being questioned on the matter. Earlier, Secretary of State John Kerry, testifying before Congress, whined, 'We got a lot more important things to move on to and get done.'
"But they won’t 'get done' — not until the administration finally comes clean about Benghazi."
|
|
| |
— Michael A. Walsh, New York Post
|
|
|
— Michael A. Walsh, New York Post
|
|
Posted May 03, 2013 • 07:56 AM
|
|
|
|