|
|
|
29 March 2013
Luca Gattoni-Celli, editorial intern and reporter at The American Spectator, discusses how the White House's gun control agenda misses the mark.
0:00
0:00
Related Podcasts
06 August 2026
Timothy Lee, CFIF’s Senior Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs, discusses the public policy ramifications of ignoring Dr. Anthony Fauci’s COVID-era diary, whether his diary entries contradict what he told the public, and why he is facing a contempt charge from Congress.
21 March 2025
Jaimie Cavanaugh, Legal Policy Counsel at the Pacific Legal Foundation, discusses what states can do to create more competition and drive down the rising cost of healthcare, how Certificate of Need (CON) laws impede access to care and block competition while limiting consumer choice and stifling innovation, and what state legislators can and should do to reform and repeal these antiquated laws.
24 October 2024
Phil Kerpen, President of American Commitment, discusses a recently filed lawsuit seeking emails on why the American Academy of Pediatrics backtracked in 2020 on supporting schools reopening in the fall of 2020, the role of the teachers unions, and the potential political motivation behind the reversal.
11 August 2023
Jaimie Cavanaugh, Attorney for the Institute for Justice, discusses the recently released report titled, “Striving for Better Care: A Review of Kentucky’s Certificate of Need Laws,” how the key takeaways apply in other states, and why doctors and patients (not government officials) should decide when and where care is needed.
19 January 2023
Ron Shultis, Director of Policy and Research for the Beacon Center of Tennessee and Beacon Impact, discusses the history of Certificate of Need (CON) laws, the chilling effect they have on healthcare access and expansion, and the positive impact eliminating CON laws would have in Tennessee and other states that still have CON laws on their books.
26 August 2022
Scott Blackburn, Research Director at the Institute for Free Speech, discusses a first-of-its-kind report that grades the freedom of citizens and advocacy groups in each state to speak about candidates, government and issues of public policy, which states performed poorly, and which states earned a respectable score.
