SCOTUS Decision Could Wrongfully Expand Union Membership and Political Clout
13 June 2014
Paul Kersey, director of labor policy at the Illinois Policy Institute, discusses the Supreme Court case of Harris v. Quinn, which potentially could force countless Medicaid recipients who care for sick or disabled family members to be forced to join the SEIU, and why such a ruling would be wrong and violative of First Amendment freedom of speech and association.
0:00 0:00

Related Podcasts

Upcoming SCOTUS Decisions: Resolving Disputes at the Core of Constitutional Governance
03 June 2026
Michael O’Neill, Senior Vice President and Assistant General Counsel at Landmark Legal Foundation, discusses three upcoming decisions in some of the biggest cases before the U.S. Supreme Court this term and his predictions on how they may be decided.
SCOTUS Begins October 2025 Term
10 October 2025
Hans von Spakovsky, Manager of the Election Law Reform Initiative and a Senior Legal Fellow in the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation, discusses some of the more significant cases among the 39 already on the U.S. Supreme Court’s current term docket, the volume of emergency appeals before the Court this summer, and why this term is shaping up as one of the most momentous in the Court’s history.
SCOTUS and 'The Miseducation of America's Elites'
05 December 2024
Ilya Shapiro, Senior Fellow and Director of Constitutional Studies at the Manhattan Institute, discusses the unprecedented but not unconstitutional idea of President-elect Trump nominating Supreme Court justices prior to a vacancy, the likelihood of an upcoming retirement of a current justice, the current caseload of the Court, and his new book, "Lawless: The Miseducation of America's Elites."
Clock Ticking Down on SCOTUS' Decision On ObamaCare Subsidies
22 May 2015
Ashton Ellis, CFIF Contributing Editor, discusses what Congress should do if the Supreme Court strikes down ObamaCare subsidies for health insurance purchased on exchanges set up by the federal government, why some Americans had to pay back the IRS for ObamaCare subsidies, and the negative implications of ObamaCare across the nation.
SCOTUS, Congress and On-going Efforts to Regulate Political Spending and Activities
06 June 2014
Erin Murphy, partner at Bancroft PLLC, discusses her successful legal argument before the U.S. Supreme Court in McCutcheon v. FEC, in which the Court held the federal aggregate limits on campaign contributions unconstitutional, and her work on Bond v. United States, a case recently decided by the Court involving a poisoned mailbox.
An Update on SCOTUS's Pro-2nd Amendment Decision and Obama's Cozy Relationship with BP
29 July 2010
Interview with CFIF's Timothy Lee on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in McDonald v. Chicago, as well as the Obama Administration's cozy relationship with BP.