|
|
|
23 April 2021
William J. Conti, a partner in the Washington, DC, office of Baker & Hostetler, discusses National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston, a case before the U.S. Supreme Court to determine whether the NCAA's limits on compensation for student athletes violate the nation's antitrust laws, and why abolishing the Senate filibuster would be shortsighted.
0:00
0:00
Related Podcasts
13 September 2024
In an interview with CFIF, William Conti, an attorney in Washington, D.C., discusses the first debate between former President Trump and Vice President Harris, the impact of endorsements, the status of the fight for the Senate in 2024, and the Republican bench looking forward to 2028.
02 April 2020
Mario Loyola, Senior Fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, discusses rapid testing options, "finger-prick" immunoassay tests, "herd immunity," the effectiveness of social-distancing measures, whether the government can require people to undergo a medical test, and privacy implications of test kits linked to smartphone apps.
16 August 2019
Mary Clare Amselem, Policy Analyst in Education Policy at The Heritage Foundation, discusses proposed legislation to expand access to career and technical education and a second proposal requiring colleges to pay 50% of the student loan balance for loans that enter default, giving colleges "skin in the game."
07 June 2019
Phil Kerpen, President of American Commitment, discusses the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's proposal to relax the Obama-era rules that would severely restrict the availability of small-dollar loans and why Director Kathleen Kraninger should stay the course on reversal.
15 March 2019
Timothy Lee, CFIF's Senior Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs, discusses 5G and what it means for consumers and businesses, and the federal appeals court's rejection of the government's bid to block AT&T's acquisition of Time Warner.
11 January 2019
Adam Michel, Policy Analyst with the Roe Institute for Economic Policy at The Heritage Foundation, discusses notable changes in the House Democratic rules package that could mean more spending and higher taxes and how universal savings accounts could help Americans save for their own priorities.
