From our friends at Unleash Prosperity, another fantastic visual aid to rebut the predictable default…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: Climate Change Causing Wildfires? No.

From our friends at Unleash Prosperity, another fantastic visual aid to rebut the predictable default rationalization that climate change, rather than incompetent leadership, underlies wildfires in California or elsewhere:

 

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="874"] Climate Change? No.[/caption]

 …[more]

January 17, 2025 • 07:50 AM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Home Press Room CFIF Urges Nebraska Lawmakers to Reject New Taxes on Delivery Services
CFIF Urges Nebraska Lawmakers to Reject New Taxes on Delivery Services Print
Wednesday, August 07 2024

August 7, 2024

The Honorable John Arch
Speaker of the Legislature
Room 2103
P.O. Box 94604
Lincoln, NE 68509
 
The Honorable Lou Ann Linehan 
Chair, Revenue Committee 
Nebraska State Legislature  
Room 1116, State Capitol 
1445 K Street 
Lincoln, NE 68508 

Dear Speaker Arch and Chair Aguilar: 

The Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) writes in opposition to LB 19, LB 26, and LB 48, which threaten considerable harm to hardworking taxpayers, disadvantaged communities and small businesses.  Although the taxes proposed in these bills may appear superficially small, they will add up quickly for Nebraskans who depend on the delivery marketplace the most.  

It is beyond dispute that delivery services are an increasingly central part of our economy on which consumers increasingly rely.  Over half of U.S. adults used a delivery service between 2021 to 2022, and that number continues to grow rapidly.  Nebraska should welcome the increased commerce that this new market has created for communities and small businesses, not penalize the innovators who have utilized it to bring new sources of revenue for the state.  

We’re particularly concerned about the disparate impact the proposed tax will have on Nebraska’s small businesses.  According to the Nebraska Business Development Center, 47% of Nebraska’s private workforce is employed by its membership of over 160,000 small businesses.  Many of those businesses – from local florists to neighborhood restaurants – have organizational structures inextricably tied to and reliant upon delivery services.  Tight budgets of local businesses can also increase revenue volatility from even the slightest tax increase.  That means that even marginal delivery taxes could force small businesses to cut back delivery services, forcing them to either increase prices of their goods or absorb the taxes completely.  

Additionally, LB 19, LB 26, and LB 48 will compound the economic challenges facing vulnerable, low-income families in need.  A 2018 study found that nearly 13% of Nebraskans are food insecure, and that number has continued to rise since the COVID pandemic.  Delivery options expand food access to these households – especially those in more remote areas in the state – but the proposed taxes would threaten those options.  

Other populations such as seniors, those with disabilities and others unable to easily travel will also feel the sting of these bills.  Beyond limiting their access to food and household goods, senior citizens and countless Nebraskans working part-time as caregivers to loved ones and neighbors in need often rely on flexible gig economy jobs as an additional source of income.  Delivery services can provide that flexibility, which offers an additional reason for Nebraska lawmakers to champion this growing market rather than punish those embracing it.  

For these reasons, we urge you to oppose LB 19, LB 26, LB 48, and any other proposed legislation seeking to undermine Nebraska’s economy and vulnerable populations reliant on delivery services. 

Sincerely, 
/s/ 
Jeffrey Mazzella
President
Center for Individual Freedom  
 
Related Articles :
Notable Quote   
 
"On Jan. 1, California's new anti-election integrity law went into effect, prohibiting local governments in the Golden State from requiring voters to show identification to cast ballots in elections. Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the restrictive legislation into law a little more than a month before November's historic presidential election.It's certainly not the first time the far-left governor with higher…[more]
 
 
— Matt Kittle, The Federalist
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you support or oppose Elon Musk's DOGE work, including his unconventional and controversial methods?