America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
So-Called "Railway Safety Act" Constitutes a Political Handout to Big Labor That Does Nothing to Improve Safety At All

America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains a pillar of our economy.

Unfortunately, a destructive proposal before Congress misleadingly named the "Railway Safety Act" (RSA), part of broader surface transportation reauthorization, threatens great harm to our railroads.

Simply put, the bill has nothing to do with improving safety, but has a lot to do with advancing the political agenda of Big Labor.  At a moment when inflation burdens American families and fragile supply chains remain vulnerable to disruption, the last thing our economy or rail sector need is another costly federal mandate imposed upon one of the nation’s most important transportation sectors.

As an initial matter, as noted by The Wall Street Journal, the…[more]

May 20, 2026 • 04:28 PM
Home Press Room CFIF Reiterates Support for Federal NO FAKES Act
CFIF Reiterates Support for Federal NO FAKES Act Print
Tuesday, May 20 2025

WASHINGTON, DC – The Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) today reiterates strong support for the “Nurture Originals, Foster Art, and Keep Entertainment Safe” (NO FAKES) Act.  

The bipartisan legislation, sponsored by U.S. Senators Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Thom Tillis (R-NC), Chris Coons (D-CT) and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), and joined by Representatives Maria Salazar (R-FL) and Madeline Dean (D-PA) in the U.S. House, would protect the voice and visual likenesses of artists across the music, film, television and other industries, as well as other individuals, from “deepfakes” and other unauthorized digital replicas. 

With the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee scheduled to hold a hearing on the NO FAKES Act this week, CFIF President Jeffrey Mazzella issued the following statement further explaining the importance of the legislation:  

“Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is quickly becoming an increasingly prevalent part of society and our economy, which presents the possibility of both significant benefits and extreme peril.  Whatever one’s opinion of the competing costs and benefits of AI, however, all can agree that it must not become a method to steal from artists and other individuals by appropriating their images, voices or other likenesses for improper gain.  

“Artists of every discipline invest enormous amounts of time, talent and financial resources to create their works.  Accordingly, it’s unfair to have those works violated and appropriated by AI for others’ exploitative purposes without approval and fair compensation.  

“Unauthorized AI deepfakes and other digital replicas threaten small, emerging and struggling artists and other individuals most, because they don’t possess the revenue or power to overcome their losses or vindicate their rights via the legal process.  

“The NO FAKES Act is carefully crafted legislation that will both protect against deepfakes and other digital replicas while at the same time providing important First Amendment safeguards for categories of storytelling such as biopics, docudramas, parodies and satires.

“The bipartisan NO FAKES Act has attracted the support of a broad range of stakeholders as it appropriately addresses an emerging threat. Congress should move without delay to pass it.”

###

Related Articles :
Notable Quote   
 
"As home values skyrocket, taxpayers grow increasingly frustrated with 'dinner table issues' such as confidence in a secure financial future and anxiety over 'affordability.' Republican-led states enjoy budget surpluses, as a new trend of eliminating property taxes is emerging in red states.On Tuesday, the Florida State Legislature approved a November ballot measure that would abolish property taxes…[more]
 
 
— Amanda Head, Just the News
 
Liberty Poll   

In a time of growing national economic stress, should the Artemis moon missions, expected to ultimately cost taxpayers more than $100 billion, be continued or postponed?