America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
So-Called "Railway Safety Act" Constitutes a Political Handout to Big Labor That Does Nothing to Improve Safety At All

America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains a pillar of our economy.

Unfortunately, a destructive proposal before Congress misleadingly named the "Railway Safety Act" (RSA), part of broader surface transportation reauthorization, threatens great harm to our railroads.

Simply put, the bill has nothing to do with improving safety, but has a lot to do with advancing the political agenda of Big Labor.  At a moment when inflation burdens American families and fragile supply chains remain vulnerable to disruption, the last thing our economy or rail sector need is another costly federal mandate imposed upon one of the nation’s most important transportation sectors.

As an initial matter, as noted by The Wall Street Journal, the…[more]

May 20, 2026 • 04:28 PM
Press Releases
New Poll: Red State Voters Oppose Eliminating Vaccine Requirements By Wide Margins Print E-mail
Wednesday, October 15 2025

WASHINGTON, DC – Voters in four red states spanning different geographic regions of the United States oppose eliminating vaccine mandates in their respective states by wide margins, according to a new poll commissioned by the Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) and conducted by the polling firm Cygnal.

The poll was conducted as the public debate over vaccines has intensified nationwide, and on the heels of Florida moving toward becoming the only state in the nation to eliminate all vaccine requirements. 

According to the poll, roughly two-thirds of voters in Arkansas (63%), Louisiana (64%), Kansas (71%) and Oklahoma (67%) oppose their states adopting a policy to eliminate all vaccine requirements, including a significant majority of well over 50% of voters in each state who strongly oppose such a policy.  Just 21% of voters support eliminating vaccine mandates in all of those states except Louisiana, where 24% of voters support such a policy.  

Similarly, roughly two-thirds of voters in Arkansas, Louisiana and Oklahoma believe childhood vaccines provide significant benefits and are essential – more than double the number who believe vaccines may offer some benefits but are concerned about potential risks and side effects (24%, 29% and 27%, respectively).  In Kansas, 72% of voters believe childhood vaccines provide significant benefits and are essential, compared to only 22% who believe vaccines may offer some benefits but are concerned about potential risks and side effects

Also by wide margins, voters in all four states would be less likely to support their state legislator if he or she supported plans to end all vaccine requirements statewide – Arkansas (67%, including 58% who would be much less likely); Louisiana (68%, including 58% who would be much less likely); Kansas (70%, including 62% who would be much less likely); Oklahoma (70%, including 61% who would be much less likely).

Also of note, voters in each state overwhelmingly support widespread access to vaccines. More than 80% of voters support policies that ensure vaccines are easily available at local pharmacies and fully covered by insurance – Arkansas (86%), Louisiana (83%), Kansas (87%), Oklahoma (89%).  Voters are equally as supportive of efforts to increase access and insurance coverage for vaccines so that all children can meet school vaccination requirements – Arkansas (82%), Louisiana (80%), Kansas (83%), Oklahoma (86%).

There is near-universal agreement that the process for approving vaccines should be grounded in scientific evidence and designed to support innovation that protects individuals and families (Arkansas - 83%, Louisiana – 80%, Kansas – 85%, Oklahoma – 86%) and that vaccine recommendations should be guided by physicians, scientists, and public health experts trained to evaluate vaccine risks and benefits (Arkansas – 79%, Louisiana – 76%, Kansas – 80%, Oklahoma – 80%).

The survey in Arkansas was conducted September 25 – 27, 2025. The survey in Kansas was conducted September 25 – 28, 2025.  The survey in Oklahoma was conducted September 26 – 27, 2025.  500 likely general election voters were surveyed in each of those three states, and each of the surveys has a margin of error of ±4.37%.  The survey for Louisiana was conducted September 25 – 27, 2025, with 515 likely general election voters and has a margin of error of ±4.30%.  Known registered voters in all four states were interviewed via online panel and SMS. The surveys were weighted to a likely general election voter universe.

Read the combined state polling memo here.

Read the polling memo for Arkansas here and see the slide deck for Arkansas here.

Read the polling memo for Louisiana here and see the slide deck for Louisiana here.

Read the polling memo for Kansas here and see the slide deck for Kansas here.

Read the polling memo for Oklahoma here and see the slide deck for Oklahoma here.

###

 


Page 13 of 303
Notable Quote   
 
"As home values skyrocket, taxpayers grow increasingly frustrated with 'dinner table issues' such as confidence in a secure financial future and anxiety over 'affordability.' Republican-led states enjoy budget surpluses, as a new trend of eliminating property taxes is emerging in red states.On Tuesday, the Florida State Legislature approved a November ballot measure that would abolish property taxes…[more]
 
 
— Amanda Head, Just the News
 
Liberty Poll   

In a time of growing national economic stress, should the Artemis moon missions, expected to ultimately cost taxpayers more than $100 billion, be continued or postponed?